• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新定义胰腺导管腺癌的 R1 切除术:肿瘤淋巴结负担和淋巴结比率是与生存相关的唯一预后因素。

Redefining the R1 resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: tumour lymph nodal burden and lymph node ratio are the only prognostic factors associated with survival.

机构信息

Centre for HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2013 Sep;15(9):674-80. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12019. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1111/hpb.12019
PMID:23458477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3948534/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The presence of positive nodal disease (LND) and the number of lymph nodes involved (LNB) are known to be significant prognostic markers for resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. In addition, the ratio of the number of involved nodes to the number of nodes resected known as the lymph node ratio (LNR) is emerging as an important prognostic marker. The role of the resection margin (RM) as presently defined (R1 ≤ 1 mm) is unclear as results differ based on the dataset. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nodal disease and a redefined RM on outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of pancreatic head resections for adenocarcinomas from 2003-2009. The RM was re-analysed based on tumour clearance and categorized into: histopathological evidence of a tumour; ≤ 0.5 mm, ≤ 1 mm, ≤ 1.5 mm, or ≤ 2.0 mm of the actual surgical resection margin. The impact of histopathological variables on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analysed.

RESULTS

LND, LNB and LNR were independent prognostic markers for CSS (P = 0.048, 0.003, 0.016) but, did not influence DFS. A LNR < 0.143 was associated with a higher CSS [38.16 ± 4.69 versus 20.59 ± 2.20 months, P = 0.0042, hazard ratio (HR) 3.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-9.23)]. An R1 RM was not associated with CSS or DFS on multivariate analysis, irrespective of the distance. LNB and LNR maintained independent significance irrespective of the size of the RM.

CONCLUSION

LNB and LNR are the only prognostic factors for CSS in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, but do not predict recurrence. Microscopic RMs does not seem to influence the outcome even when redefined. Further prospective studies are indicated to substantiate these findings.

摘要

介绍

阳性淋巴结疾病(LND)的存在和受累淋巴结数量(LNB)被认为是切除胰腺腺癌的重要预后标志物。此外,受累淋巴结与切除淋巴结的比例,即淋巴结比值(LNR),作为一个重要的预后标志物正在出现。目前定义的切缘(RM)的作用(R1≤1mm)尚不清楚,因为结果因数据集而异。本研究旨在评估淋巴结疾病和重新定义的 RM 对预后的影响。

材料和方法

对 2003 年至 2009 年期间胰腺头部腺癌切除术进行回顾性分析。根据肿瘤清除情况重新分析 RM,并分为:肿瘤组织学证据;≤0.5mm、≤1mm、≤1.5mm 或实际手术切缘≤2.0mm。分析组织病理学变量对癌症特异性生存(CSS)和无病生存(DFS)的影响。

结果

LND、LNB 和 LNR 是 CSS 的独立预后标志物(P=0.048、0.003、0.016),但不影响 DFS。LNR<0.143 与较高的 CSS 相关[38.16±4.69 与 20.59±2.20 个月,P=0.0042,危险比(HR)3.74(95%置信区间(CI)1.52-9.23)]。多变量分析显示,无论 RM 的距离如何,R1 RM 与 CSS 或 DFS 均无关。LNB 和 LNR 独立于 RM 的大小具有重要意义。

结论

LNB 和 LNR 是胰腺头部腺癌患者 CSS 的唯一预后因素,但不能预测复发。即使重新定义,微观 RM 似乎也不会影响结果。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Redefining the R1 resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: tumour lymph nodal burden and lymph node ratio are the only prognostic factors associated with survival.重新定义胰腺导管腺癌的 R1 切除术:肿瘤淋巴结负担和淋巴结比率是与生存相关的唯一预后因素。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Sep;15(9):674-80. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12019. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
2
The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer.淋巴结比率是胰腺癌切除术后最强的预后因素。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jul;13(7):1337-44. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0919-2. Epub 2009 May 6.
3
Lymph node ratio versus number of affected lymph nodes as predictors of survival for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.淋巴结比率与受影响的淋巴结数量作为可切除胰腺腺癌生存的预测指标。
World J Surg. 2010 Apr;34(4):768-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0336-4.
4
Nodal counts and lymph node ratio impact survival after distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.淋巴结计数和淋巴结比率对胰腺癌远端胰腺切除术后的生存率有影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Nov;18(11):1929-35. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2566-5. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
5
Lymph node metastases in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predictors of disease recurrence and survival.切除的胰腺导管腺癌中的淋巴结转移:疾病复发和生存的预测因素
Br J Cancer. 2017 Dec 5;117(12):1874-1882. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.349. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Multi-institutional analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma demonstrating the effect of diabetes status on survival after resection.多机构胰腺腺癌分析表明糖尿病状态对切除术后生存的影响。
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Apr;14(4):228-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00432.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
7
Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas.胰周癌切除术后淋巴结比率的预后价值。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jun;16(6):582-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00614.x. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
8
Pancreatic cancer metastatic to a limited number of lymph nodes has no impact on outcome.胰腺癌转移至少数淋巴结对预后无影响。
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jun;18(6):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.02.004.
9
Prognostic impact of lymph node status in patients after total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A strobe-compliant study.胰腺导管腺癌全胰切除术后患者淋巴结状态的预后影响:一项符合STROBE标准的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19327. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019327.
10
Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer.淋巴结比率对胰腺和壶腹周围癌患者生存的影响。
Br J Surg. 2015 Feb;102(3):237-45. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9709. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Prognostic Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Pancreatobiliary Cancer.循环肿瘤细胞在胰胆肿瘤患者中的预后意义。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar;34(3):278-286. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22260.
2
Effects of the Largest Metastatic Lymph Node Size on the Outcomes of Patients who Underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.最大转移淋巴结大小对接受胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌患者预后的影响。
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022 Dec 19;56(4):497-502. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2022.33340. eCollection 2022.
3
CHRNB2 represses pancreatic cancer migration and invasion via inhibiting β-catenin pathway.CHRNB2通过抑制β-连环蛋白通路抑制胰腺癌的迁移和侵袭。
Cancer Cell Int. 2022 Nov 7;22(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12935-022-02768-8.
4
Predictive Model of Early Death of Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Curative Resection: A SEER-Based Study.可切除胰腺导管腺癌根治性切除术后早期死亡的预测模型:基于 SEER 的研究。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221084853. doi: 10.1177/10732748221084853.
5
Lymph node ratio predicts prognosis in patients with surgically resected invasive pancreatic cystic neoplasms.淋巴结比率可预测手术切除的浸润性胰腺囊性肿瘤患者的预后。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Oct;9(10):5843-5856. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-1355.
6
Antibiotic use influences outcomes in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.抗生素的使用影响晚期胰腺腺癌患者的预后。
Cancer Med. 2021 Aug;10(15):5041-5050. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3870. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
7
Pathomorphological features of metastatic lymph nodes as predictors of postoperative prognosis in pancreatic cancer.转移性淋巴结的病理形态学特征作为胰腺癌术后预后的预测指标
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(5):e14369. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014369.
8
Adjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation is associated with improved survival for resected stage I-II pancreatic cancer.辅助化疗后同步放化疗可改善可切除 I-II 期胰腺癌患者的生存。
Cancer Med. 2019 Mar;8(3):939-952. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1967. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
9
Nomograms predict long-term survival for patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy.列线图预测胰十二指肠切除术后壶腹周围腺癌患者的长期生存。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4240-x.
10
A Comprehensive Assessment of Accurate Lymph Node Staging and Preoperative Detection in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.对切除胰腺癌中准确的淋巴结分期和术前检测的全面评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Feb;22(2):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3607-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Number of metastatic lymph nodes, but not lymph node ratio, is an independent prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic carcinoma.淋巴结转移数目而非淋巴结比率是胰腺癌切除术后的独立预后因素。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Aug;211(2):196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
2
Predicting patient survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy: histopathological criteria based on perineural infiltration and lymphovascular invasion.预测恶性胰十二指肠切除术后患者的生存情况:基于神经周围浸润和血管淋巴管侵犯的组织病理学标准。
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Mar;12(2):101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00140.x.
3
Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.单纯阳性切缘并不影响胰头十二指肠切除术治疗胰导管腺癌的生存。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):1003-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d77369.
4
Lymph node ratio versus number of affected lymph nodes as predictors of survival for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.淋巴结比率与受影响的淋巴结数量作为可切除胰腺腺癌生存的预测指标。
World J Surg. 2010 Apr;34(4):768-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0336-4.
5
Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin.胰腺癌R1切除的分类:切缘1毫米内肿瘤累及的预后相关性。
Histopathology. 2009 Sep;55(3):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03376.x.
6
Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP).胰十二指肠切除术治疗癌症时切缘状态对生存的影响:利兹病理方案(LEEPP)。
HPB (Oxford). 2009 Feb;11(1):18-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2008.00013.x.
7
The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer.淋巴结比率是胰腺癌切除术后最强的预后因素。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jul;13(7):1337-44. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0919-2. Epub 2009 May 6.
8
Surgical treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement.可切除及交界可切除胰腺癌的外科治疗:专家共识声明
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1736-44. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0416-6. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
9
Long-term survival after multidisciplinary management of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.切除性胰腺癌多学科管理后的长期生存
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Apr;16(4):836-47. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0295-2. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
10
Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections.大多数胰腺癌切除术属于R1切除。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun;15(6):1651-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9839-8. Epub 2008 Mar 20.