Suppr超能文献

重新定义胰腺导管腺癌的 R1 切除术:肿瘤淋巴结负担和淋巴结比率是与生存相关的唯一预后因素。

Redefining the R1 resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: tumour lymph nodal burden and lymph node ratio are the only prognostic factors associated with survival.

机构信息

Centre for HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2013 Sep;15(9):674-80. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12019. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The presence of positive nodal disease (LND) and the number of lymph nodes involved (LNB) are known to be significant prognostic markers for resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. In addition, the ratio of the number of involved nodes to the number of nodes resected known as the lymph node ratio (LNR) is emerging as an important prognostic marker. The role of the resection margin (RM) as presently defined (R1 ≤ 1 mm) is unclear as results differ based on the dataset. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nodal disease and a redefined RM on outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of pancreatic head resections for adenocarcinomas from 2003-2009. The RM was re-analysed based on tumour clearance and categorized into: histopathological evidence of a tumour; ≤ 0.5 mm, ≤ 1 mm, ≤ 1.5 mm, or ≤ 2.0 mm of the actual surgical resection margin. The impact of histopathological variables on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analysed.

RESULTS

LND, LNB and LNR were independent prognostic markers for CSS (P = 0.048, 0.003, 0.016) but, did not influence DFS. A LNR < 0.143 was associated with a higher CSS [38.16 ± 4.69 versus 20.59 ± 2.20 months, P = 0.0042, hazard ratio (HR) 3.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-9.23)]. An R1 RM was not associated with CSS or DFS on multivariate analysis, irrespective of the distance. LNB and LNR maintained independent significance irrespective of the size of the RM.

CONCLUSION

LNB and LNR are the only prognostic factors for CSS in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, but do not predict recurrence. Microscopic RMs does not seem to influence the outcome even when redefined. Further prospective studies are indicated to substantiate these findings.

摘要

介绍

阳性淋巴结疾病(LND)的存在和受累淋巴结数量(LNB)被认为是切除胰腺腺癌的重要预后标志物。此外,受累淋巴结与切除淋巴结的比例,即淋巴结比值(LNR),作为一个重要的预后标志物正在出现。目前定义的切缘(RM)的作用(R1≤1mm)尚不清楚,因为结果因数据集而异。本研究旨在评估淋巴结疾病和重新定义的 RM 对预后的影响。

材料和方法

对 2003 年至 2009 年期间胰腺头部腺癌切除术进行回顾性分析。根据肿瘤清除情况重新分析 RM,并分为:肿瘤组织学证据;≤0.5mm、≤1mm、≤1.5mm 或实际手术切缘≤2.0mm。分析组织病理学变量对癌症特异性生存(CSS)和无病生存(DFS)的影响。

结果

LND、LNB 和 LNR 是 CSS 的独立预后标志物(P=0.048、0.003、0.016),但不影响 DFS。LNR<0.143 与较高的 CSS 相关[38.16±4.69 与 20.59±2.20 个月,P=0.0042,危险比(HR)3.74(95%置信区间(CI)1.52-9.23)]。多变量分析显示,无论 RM 的距离如何,R1 RM 与 CSS 或 DFS 均无关。LNB 和 LNR 独立于 RM 的大小具有重要意义。

结论

LNB 和 LNR 是胰腺头部腺癌患者 CSS 的唯一预后因素,但不能预测复发。即使重新定义,微观 RM 似乎也不会影响结果。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

7
Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas.胰周癌切除术后淋巴结比率的预后价值。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jun;16(6):582-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00614.x. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections.大多数胰腺癌切除术属于R1切除。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun;15(6):1651-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9839-8. Epub 2008 Mar 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验