• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

穿透解离思维的迷雾:视觉显著性在持续注意力反应任务中的作用

Penetrating the fog of the decoupled mind: the effects of visual salience in the sustained attention to response task.

作者信息

Smallwood Jonathan

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):32-40. doi: 10.1037/a0030760.

DOI:10.1037/a0030760
PMID:23458549
Abstract

An absence of coupling between cognition and perception can mean that the mind neglects the careful processing of information relevant to the task at hand and errors can ensue. Given that highly salient perceptual events can automatically capture attention, the current study explored whether the same neglect of task-relevant information was possible for stimuli with high levels of perceptual saliency (e.g., identifiable by colour). In four experiments, participants performed a go/no-go task with a low frequency of no-go events. Across all experiments, response inhibition was more successful for coloured no-go targets than for stimuli that shared the same colour as the go targets. In addition, the response time (reaction time [RT]) for rare, coloured go targets was slower than when the same events were noncolored. Together, these results suggest that in relatively simple go/no-go tasks, highly salient perceptual events capture attention in an automatic fashion. Increased visual salience is argued to be beneficial when associated with no-go targets because it momentarily enforces coupling between attention and perception, disrupting ongoing behaviour at the precise moment when not responding is the correct action to take. These results suggest that although the mind may at times neglect events in the environment, salient perceptual events cannot be ignored in the same way.

摘要

认知与感知之间缺乏耦合可能意味着大脑忽视了对手头任务相关信息的仔细处理,进而可能产生错误。鉴于高度显著的感知事件能够自动吸引注意力,当前研究探讨了对于具有高感知显著性的刺激(例如,可通过颜色识别),是否同样会忽视与任务相关的信息。在四项实验中,参与者执行了一项“是/否”任务,其中“否”事件的出现频率较低。在所有实验中,对于彩色的“否”目标,反应抑制比对与“是”目标颜色相同的刺激更为成功。此外,对于罕见的彩色“是”目标,反应时间(反应时[RT])比相同事件为非彩色时更慢。综合来看,这些结果表明,在相对简单的“是/否”任务中,高度显著的感知事件会以自动的方式吸引注意力。当与“否”目标相关联时,视觉显著性的增加被认为是有益的,因为它会瞬间加强注意力与感知之间的耦合,在不做出反应才是正确行动的精确时刻干扰正在进行的行为。这些结果表明,尽管大脑有时可能会忽视环境中的事件,但显著的感知事件却不能以同样的方式被忽视。

相似文献

1
Penetrating the fog of the decoupled mind: the effects of visual salience in the sustained attention to response task.穿透解离思维的迷雾:视觉显著性在持续注意力反应任务中的作用
Can J Exp Psychol. 2013 Mar;67(1):32-40. doi: 10.1037/a0030760.
2
N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.在纯视觉搜索任务和混合视觉搜索任务中,N2pc以及颜色和方向单一特征对注意力的捕获
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Sep;73(3):279-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 4.
3
The effects of task and saliency on latencies for colour and motion processing.任务和显著性对颜色与运动处理潜伏期的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 22;271(1535):139-46. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2566.
4
Two types of action error: electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks.两种类型的动作错误:关于在执行/不执行任务中产生错误的可分离抑制性和持续性注意神经机制的电生理证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jan;21(1):93-104. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21008.
5
Age-related differences in selection by visual saliency.视觉显著性选择中的年龄相关差异。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Oct;75(7):1382-94. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0499-9.
6
Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task.刺激比例在持续注意力反应任务中影响反应策略。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):2989-98. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4701-x. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
7
Complementary roles of cortical oscillations in automatic and controlled processing during rapid serial tasks.快速序列任务中皮质振荡在自动和控制加工中的互补作用。
Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:268-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.081. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.在不同感知负荷下处理多维物体:自下而上感知显著性的优先级
Brain Res. 2006 Oct 9;1114(1):113-24. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.071. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
9
The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.试验的剩余部分:目标确定的选择性注意的试验间抑制
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:195-213. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17611-2.
10
An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors.针对特定颜色的有效注意集并不能防止被偶尔出现的运动干扰物捕获。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(7):1340-65. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1080738. Epub 2015 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping patterns of thought onto brain activity during movie-watching.在观影过程中,将思维模式映射到大脑活动上。
Elife. 2025 Jan 10;13:RP97731. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97731.
2
Perceptual decoupling in the sustained attention to response task is unlikely.持续注意反应任务中的知觉分离不太可能。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Aug;242(8):2033-2040. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06885-w. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
3
Perceptual decoupling or trigger happiness: the effect of response delays and shorter presentation times on a go-no-go task with a high go prevalence.
感知解耦或触发快乐:在高 Go 发生率的 Go/No-Go 任务中,反应延迟和较短呈现时间的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Apr;242(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06799-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
4
Dispositional mindfulness: Dissociable affective and cognitive processes.倾向正念:可分离的情感和认知过程。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1798-1808. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02462-y. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
5
Mindfulness training preserves sustained attention and resting state anticorrelation between default-mode network and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A randomized controlled trial.正念训练保持持续注意力和默认模式网络与背外侧前额叶皮质之间的静息状态去相关:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec 15;41(18):5356-5369. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25197. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
Electrophysiological correlates of spontaneous mind wandering in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍中自发性思维漫游的电生理相关性。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Aug 5;391:112632. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112632. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
7
Mind wandering perspective on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍的思维漫游视角。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Sep;92:464-476. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
8
You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.你正在衡量的是快速做出决策的能力,而非注意力不集中:持续注意力反应任务并不能测量持续注意力。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Aug;236(8):2255-2262. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5291-6. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Relationship of Event-Related Potentials to the Vigilance Decrement.事件相关电位与警觉性下降的关系。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 6;9:237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00237. eCollection 2018.
10
Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research.近期持续性注意力研究在理论、神经学及临床方面取得的进展。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 May;1396(1):70-91. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13318. Epub 2017 Mar 5.