• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知解耦或触发快乐:在高 Go 发生率的 Go/No-Go 任务中,反应延迟和较短呈现时间的影响。

Perceptual decoupling or trigger happiness: the effect of response delays and shorter presentation times on a go-no-go task with a high go prevalence.

机构信息

University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, 3F5, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2024 Apr;242(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06799-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06799-7
PMID:38448673
Abstract

In the current investigation, we modified the high Go, low No-Go Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART). Some researchers argue a commission error, an inappropriate response to a No-Go stimulus, in the SART is due to the participant being inattentive, or perceptually decoupled, during stimulus onset. Response delays in the SART reduce commission errors. A response delay may therefore enable a participant who is initially inattentive to recouple their attention in time to appropriately perceive the stimulus and withhold a response to a No-Go stimulus. However, shortening stimulus display duration in the SART should limit the possibility of the participant identifying the stimulus later, if they are initially not attending the stimulus. A response delay should not reduce commission errors if stimulus duration is kept to the minimum duration enabling stimulus recognition. In two experiments, we shortened stimulus onset to offset duration and added response delays of varying lengths. In both experiments, even when stimulus duration was shortened, response delays notably reduced commission errors if the delay was greater than 250 ms. In addition, using the Signal Detection Theory perspective in which errors of commission in the SART are due to a lenient response bias-trigger happiness, we predicted that response delays would result in a shift to a more conservative response bias in both experiments. These predictions were verified. The errors of commission in the SART may not be a measures of conscious awareness per se, but instead indicative of the level of participant trigger happiness-a lenient response bias.

摘要

在当前的研究中,我们对高 Go、低 No-Go 持续注意反应任务(SART)进行了修改。一些研究人员认为,SART 中的错误反应(对 No-Go 刺激的不适当反应)是由于参与者在刺激开始时注意力不集中或感知上分离。SART 中的反应延迟减少了错误反应。因此,反应延迟可能使最初注意力不集中的参与者及时重新集中注意力,正确感知刺激,并对 No-Go 刺激不做出反应。然而,如果参与者最初不关注刺激,缩短 SART 中的刺激显示持续时间应限制他们稍后识别刺激的可能性。如果将刺激持续时间保持在能够识别刺激的最短持续时间,则反应延迟不应减少错误反应。在两项实验中,我们缩短了刺激开始到结束的时间,并增加了不同长度的反应延迟。在两项实验中,即使缩短了刺激持续时间,如果延迟大于 250ms,反应延迟也显著减少了错误反应。此外,根据 SART 中的错误反应是由于宽松的反应偏差触发快乐这一信号检测理论观点,我们预测在这两项实验中,反应延迟将导致更保守的反应偏差。这些预测得到了验证。SART 中的错误反应可能不是意识意识本身的衡量标准,而是参与者触发快乐的水平的指示——宽松的反应偏差。

相似文献

1
Perceptual decoupling or trigger happiness: the effect of response delays and shorter presentation times on a go-no-go task with a high go prevalence.感知解耦或触发快乐:在高 Go 发生率的 Go/No-Go 任务中,反应延迟和较短呈现时间的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Apr;242(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06799-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
2
Perceptual decoupling in the sustained attention to response task is unlikely.持续注意反应任务中的知觉分离不太可能。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Aug;242(8):2033-2040. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06885-w. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
3
Response uncertainty influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.反应不确定性影响持续反应任务中的反应偏差:信号检测理论视角。
Psychol Res. 2024 Feb;88(1):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01847-3. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.Go 刺激概率影响反应任务中的反应偏差:信号检测理论视角。
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):509-518. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01679-7. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task.在持续注意反应任务中可靠和不可靠的警告线索。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Mar;209(3):401-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2563-9. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
6
Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).持续性操作测试(SART)中的全局干扰和空间不确定性。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.01.006.
7
Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task.刺激比例在持续注意力反应任务中影响反应策略。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):2989-98. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4701-x. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
8
Prolonging the Response Movement Reduces Commission Errors in a High-Go, Low-No-Go Target Detection Task and Composite Metrics of Performance Miss This Effect.延长反应运动可减少高 Go、低 No-Go 目标检测任务中的决策错误,且表现失误的综合指标未捕捉到这一效应。
Hum Factors. 2024 Apr;66(4):1118-1131. doi: 10.1177/00187208221127945. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
9
The effects of real-time performance feedback and performance emphasis on the sustained attention to response task (SART).实时性能反馈和绩效强调对持续注意反应任务(SART)的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1972-1979. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01602-6. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
10
Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?感知解耦还是运动解耦?
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):913-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual decoupling in the sustained attention to response task is indeed unlikely: a reply to Shelat and Geisbrecht (in press).在持续注意反应任务中的知觉解耦确实不太可能:对谢拉特和盖斯布雷希特(即将出版)的回应。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Mar 12;243(4):88. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07033-8.
2
Perceptual decoupling in the sustained attention to response task is unlikely.持续注意反应任务中的知觉分离不太可能。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Aug;242(8):2033-2040. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06885-w. Epub 2024 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.Go 刺激概率影响反应任务中的反应偏差:信号检测理论视角。
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):509-518. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01679-7. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
A Closer Look at Warning Cues on the Sustained Attention to Response Task Performance.深入探究持续注意力对反应任务表现的警示线索
Hum Factors. 2023 Dec;65(8):1793-1803. doi: 10.1177/00187208211060708. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
3
Testing failure-to-identify hunting incidents using an immersive simulation: Is it viable?
利用沉浸式模拟测试无法识别狩猎事件:是否可行?
Appl Ergon. 2021 May;93:103358. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103358. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence.运用贝叶斯因子假设检验在神经科学中建立无证据的结论。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Jul;23(7):788-799. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
The quick and the dead: A paradigm for studying friendly fire.速战速决:研究友军火力的典范。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103032. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103032. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.你正在衡量的是快速做出决策的能力,而非注意力不集中:持续注意力反应任务并不能测量持续注意力。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Aug;236(8):2255-2262. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5291-6. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Prior Mental Fatigue Impairs Marksmanship Decision Performance.先前的精神疲劳会损害射击决策表现。
Front Physiol. 2017 Sep 8;8:680. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00680. eCollection 2017.
8
Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task.刺激比例在持续注意力反应任务中影响反应策略。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):2989-98. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4701-x. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
9
The Attention-Lapse and Motor Decoupling accounts of SART performance are not mutually exclusive.SART任务表现的注意力 lapse 理论和运动解耦理论并非相互排斥。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Apr;41:189-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
10
Friendly Fire and the Sustained Attention to Response Task.友军火力与持续注意力反应任务
Hum Factors. 2015 Nov;57(7):1219-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720815605703. Epub 2015 Sep 24.