Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Feb;64(2):133-7. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.2.133. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication after anesthesia and surgery; 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists have been considered as a first-line therapy. Ramosetron and palonosetron are more recently developed drugs and have greater receptor affinity and a longer elimination half-life compared with older 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. The purpose of this study was to determine which drug is more effective for preventing PONV between ramosetron and palonosetron. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery into this study. The subjects were divided into ramosetron group and palonosetron group. The medications were provided immediately before the induction of anesthesia. The occurrence of nausea and vomiting, severity of nausea according to a visual analogue scale, and rescue anti-emetic drug use were monitored immediately after the end of surgery and at 0-6 h, 6-24 h, and 24-48 h post-surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of vomiting was significantly lower in the palonosetron group than in the ramosetron group during 0-6 h (6% vs 26%, P = 0.012) and 0-48 h (14% vs 34%, P = 0.034). The incidence of nausea and overall PONV, and the use of rescue antiemetic were not significantly different during all time intervals. The severity of nausea was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the incidence of PONV between the ramosetron and the palonosetron group have not shown the difference during 0-48 h, although palonosetron results in a lower incidence of vomiting during 0-6 h post-surgery.
背景:术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)是麻醉和手术后的常见并发症;5-羟色胺 3 型(5-HT3)受体拮抗剂已被认为是一线治疗药物。雷莫司琼和帕洛诺司琼是最近开发的药物,与较老的 5-HT3 受体拮抗剂相比,它们具有更高的受体亲和力和更长的消除半衰期。本研究旨在确定雷莫司琼和帕洛诺司琼中哪一种药物在预防 PONV 方面更有效。
方法:我们将 100 例接受妇科腹腔镜手术的患者纳入本研究。将受试者分为雷莫司琼组和帕洛诺司琼组。在麻醉诱导前立即给予药物。监测手术后即刻以及术后 0-6 h、6-24 h 和 24-48 h 时恶心和呕吐的发生、根据视觉模拟量表评估的恶心严重程度以及使用止吐补救药物的情况。
结果:在 0-6 h(6%比 26%,P=0.012)和 0-48 h(14%比 34%,P=0.034)时,帕洛诺司琼组的呕吐发生率明显低于雷莫司琼组。在所有时间间隔内,恶心的发生率和总体 PONV 以及使用止吐补救药物的情况无显著差异。两组的恶心严重程度无差异。
结论:总之,雷莫司琼组和帕洛诺司琼组在 0-48 h 期间 PONV 的发生率没有差异,尽管帕洛诺司琼在术后 0-6 h 时呕吐发生率较低。
J Clin Anesth. 2016-6-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2010-10
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010-7-12
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009-12
Eur J Pharmacol. 2009-10-15
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009-3-26
Anesth Analg. 2008-8