Suppr超能文献

术后恶心呕吐的预防:雷莫司琼与帕洛诺司琼用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的比较研究——一项前瞻性随机试验

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis: A Comparative Study of Ramosetron and Palonosetron in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - A Prospective Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Reddy G Sowmya, Manjusruthi B, Jyothsna G

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, RIMS, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):68-72. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_192_18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In spite of the availability of several antiemetic drugs, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is very common following laparoscopic surgery. Selective 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists are considered first-line agents for prophylaxis for PONV.

AIMS

In this study, we investigated and compared the efficacy of ramosetron and palonosetron in preventing PONV following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The data were analyzed with Student's -test and Chi-square test.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was a randomized, prospective, double-blinded, observational clinical study.

METHODS

A total number of 80 patients, undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgeries under general anesthesia, were randomly assigned to one of the two equal groups to receive either of the following: Group R - received injection ramosetron 0.3 mg and Group - received injection palonosetron 0.075 mg intravenous bolus immediately before the induction of anesthesia. The incidence of PONV, adverse effects of the study drugs, and need for rescue antiemetics were recorded over the next 48 h. Primary outcome was the incidence of PONV. Secondary outcomes were adverse effects of the study drugs and need for rescue.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The data were analyzed with Student's -test and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

The incidence of a complete response (no PONV and no rescue medication) during 0-3 h in the postoperative period was 82.5% with ramosetron and 90% with palonosetron; the incidence during 3-24 h postoperatively was 80% with ramosetron and 87.5% with palonosetron. During 24-48 h, the incidence was 65% and 90%, respectively ( < 0.05). The incidences of adverse effects were statistically insignificant between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic therapy with palonosetron is more effective than ramosetron for long-term prevention of PONV following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

背景

尽管有多种止吐药物可用,但腹腔镜手术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)仍非常常见。选择性5-羟色胺3型受体拮抗剂被认为是预防PONV的一线药物。

目的

在本研究中,我们调查并比较了雷莫司琼和帕洛诺司琼预防腹腔镜胆囊切除术后PONV的疗效。

统计分析

数据采用学生t检验和卡方检验进行分析。

设置与设计

这是一项随机、前瞻性、双盲观察性临床研究。

方法

总共80例在全身麻醉下接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者被随机分为两个相等的组之一,接受以下治疗:R组——在麻醉诱导前立即静脉推注0.3mg雷莫司琼注射液;P组——在麻醉诱导前立即静脉推注0.075mg帕洛诺司琼注射液。在接下来的48小时内记录PONV的发生率、研究药物的不良反应以及使用抢救性止吐药的需求。主要结局是PONV的发生率。次要结局是研究药物的不良反应和抢救需求。

统计分析

数据采用学生t检验和卡方检验进行分析。

结果

术后0 - 3小时完全缓解(无PONV且无需抢救药物)的发生率,雷莫司琼组为82.5%,帕洛诺司琼组为90%;术后3 - 24小时,雷莫司琼组为80%,帕洛诺司琼组为87.5%。在24 - 48小时期间,发生率分别为65%和90%(P<0.05)。两组间不良反应的发生率无统计学意义。

结论

对于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后PONV的长期预防,帕洛诺司琼预防性治疗比雷莫司琼更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddbd/6444952/4d01e82b2997/AER-13-68-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验