• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using electronic health records to save money.利用电子健康记录省钱。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e17-20. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001504. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
2
The impact of electronic health records on ambulatory costs among Medicaid beneficiaries.电子健康记录对医疗补助受益人群门诊费用的影响。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Jun 18;3(2). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.02.a03. eCollection 2013.
3
Effect of electronic health records on health care costs: longitudinal comparative evidence from community practices.电子健康记录对医疗费用的影响:来自社区实践的纵向比较证据。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16;159(2):97-104. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00004.
4
Shared Care: Using an Electronic Consult Form to Facilitate Primary Care Provider-Specialty Care Coordination.共同照护:使用电子咨询表促进初级保健提供者与专科护理的协调。
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Sep-Oct;18(7):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
5
How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings.如何在小型门诊环境中成功选择和实施电子健康记录(EHR)。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Feb 23;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-15.
6
The Impact of Electronic Medical Record Implementation on Labor Cost and Productivity at an Outpatient Orthopaedic Clinic.电子病历系统实施对门诊骨科诊所劳动力成本和生产力的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 19;100(18):1549-1556. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01339.
7
Effect of an imaging-based streamlined electronic healthcare process on quality and costs.基于影像的简化电子医疗流程对质量和成本的影响。
Acad Radiol. 2004 Jan;11(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00570-1.
8
Costs and benefits of health information technology.健康信息技术的成本与效益
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Apr(132):1-71. doi: 10.23970/ahrqepcerta132.
9
Physician EHR Adoption and Potentially Preventable Hospital Admissions among Medicare Beneficiaries: Panel Data Evidence, 2010-2013.医疗保险受益人中医生对电子健康记录的采用情况与潜在可预防的住院情况:2010 - 2013年面板数据证据
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51(6):2056-2075. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12586. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Association between electronic health records and health care utilization.电子健康记录与医疗保健利用之间的关联。
Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Jan 28;6(1):42-55. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-10-RA-0089. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Care in Jordan: Multidisciplinary Solutions Needed for Complex Disparities.约旦的癌症护理:应对复杂差异需要多学科解决方案。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2025 Apr;11:e2400600. doi: 10.1200/GO-24-00600. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Electronic health record in military healthcare systems: A systematic review.军事医疗系统中的电子健康记录:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 12;20(2):e0313641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313641. eCollection 2025.
3
Methodological issues of the electronic health records' use in the context of epidemiological investigations, in light of missing data: a review of the recent literature.电子健康记录在流行病学调查中应用的方法学问题,鉴于数据缺失:对近期文献的综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02004-5.
4
Hypertension and Its Associations with Dental Status: Data from the Dental, Oral, Medical Epidemiological (DOME) Nationwide Records-Based Study.高血压及其与牙齿状况的关联:来自牙科、口腔、医学流行病学(DOME)全国基于记录的研究数据。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 6;10(2):176. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020176.
5
A Framework for Performance Comparison among Major Electronic Health Record Systems.主要电子健康记录系统之间性能比较的框架
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2019 Oct 1;16(Fall):1h. eCollection 2019 Fall.
6
The role of medical data in efficient patient care delivery: a review.医学数据在高效患者护理提供中的作用:综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019 Apr 24;12:67-73. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S179259. eCollection 2019.
7
Electronic Medical Records in Greece and Oman: A Professional's Evaluation of Structure and Value.希腊和阿曼的电子病历:专业人士对其结构和价值的评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 1;15(6):1137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061137.
8
Clinical and Para Clinical Information Needs of Infertility Electronic Health Records in Iran: A Delphi Study.伊朗不孕症电子健康记录的临床及准临床信息需求:一项德尔菲研究
Acta Inform Med. 2017 Sep;25(3):163-168. doi: 10.5455/aim.2017.25.163-168.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of EHR: Simulation of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Emergency Department.电子病历的成本效益评估:急诊科腹主动脉瘤模拟。
J Med Syst. 2016 Jun;40(6):141. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0502-9. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
10
Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care.在整合行为健康与初级保健的实践中观察到的电子健康记录挑战、变通方法及解决方案
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling return on investment for an electronic medical record system in Lilongwe, Malawi.在马拉维利隆圭建立电子病历系统投资回报模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):743-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001242. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
2
Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.美国医院中电子健康记录的使用情况。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1628-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0900592. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
3
Stimulating the adoption of health information technology.促进健康信息技术的采用。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1477-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0901592. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
4
Money and the changing culture of medicine.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):101-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0806369.
5
Options for slowing the growth of health care costs.减缓医疗保健成本增长的方法。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 3;358(14):1509-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb0707912.
6
Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.系统评价:健康信息技术对医疗质量、效率和成本的影响
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
7
Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program.美国医院的护理——医院质量联盟计划。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 21;353(3):265-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa051249.
8
Quality assessment program in primary care clinics: a tool for quality improvement.基层医疗诊所的质量评估项目:质量改进工具
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Apr;16(2):175-80. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh027.
9
A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care.基层医疗中电子病历的成本效益分析。
Am J Med. 2003 Apr 1;114(5):397-403. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00057-3.
10
Drivers in the electronic medical records market.
Health Manag Technol. 2001 May;22(5):14-6, 18.

利用电子健康记录省钱。

Using electronic health records to save money.

机构信息

Medical Corps, Israel Defense Forces, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e17-20. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001504. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001504
PMID:23462876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3715342/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Health information technology, especially electronic health records (EHRs), can be used to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare providers. This study assessed the cost-savings of incorporating a list of preferred specialty care providers into the EHRs used by all primary care physicians (PCPs), accompanied by a comprehensive implementation plan.

METHODS

On January 1, 2005, all specialty clinic providers at the Israeli Defense Forces were divided into one of four financial classes based on their charges, class 1, the least expensive, being the most preferred, followed by classes 2-4. This list was incorporated into the EHRs used by all PCPs in primary care clinics. PCPs received comprehensive training. Target referral goals were determined for each class and measured for 4 years, together with the total cost of all specialist visits in the first year compared to the following years. Quality assessment (QA) scores were used as a measure of the program's effect on the quality of patient care.

RESULTS

During 2005-2008, a marginally significant decline in referrals to class 1 was observed (r=-0.254, p=0.078), however a significant increase in referral rates to class 2 was observed (r=0.957, p=0.042), concurrent with a decrease in referral rates to classes 3 and 4 (r=-0.312, p=0.024). An inverse correlation was observed between year and total costs for all visits to specialists (2008 prices; r=-0.96, p=0.04), and between the mean cost of one specialist visit over the 4 years, indicating a significant reduction in real costs (2008 prices; r=-0.995, p=0.005). QA was not affected by these changes (r=0.94, p=0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

From a policy perspective, our data suggest that EHR can facilitate effective utilization of healthcare providers and decrease costs.

摘要

目的

医疗信息技术,尤其是电子健康记录(EHRs),可以用于提高医疗服务提供者的效率和效果。本研究评估了将首选专科医生列表纳入所有初级保健医生(PCPs)使用的 EHR 中所带来的成本节约,同时还制定了全面的实施计划。

方法

2005 年 1 月 1 日,根据收费情况,将以色列国防军的所有专科诊所提供者分为四类,其中 1 类费用最低,最受欢迎,其次是 2-4 类。该列表被纳入所有初级保健诊所中 PCP 使用的 EHR 中。PCPs 接受了全面的培训。确定了每个类别目标转诊目标,并在 4 年内进行了测量,同时还比较了第一年与随后几年的所有专科就诊总费用。质量评估(QA)分数被用作衡量该计划对患者护理质量影响的指标。

结果

在 2005-2008 年期间,观察到向第 1 类转诊的比例略有下降(r=-0.254,p=0.078),但向第 2 类转诊的比例显著增加(r=0.957,p=0.042),同时向第 3 类和第 4 类转诊的比例下降(r=-0.312,p=0.024)。所有专科就诊的总费用与年份之间存在负相关(2008 年价格;r=-0.96,p=0.04),4 年内每位专科医生就诊的平均费用也呈负相关,表明实际成本显著降低(2008 年价格;r=-0.995,p=0.005)。QA 不受这些变化的影响(r=0.94,p=0.016)。

结论

从政策角度来看,我们的数据表明 EHR 可以促进医疗服务提供者的有效利用并降低成本。