Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Ste. 708, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):764-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
The senior author (JAG) recently published an article questioning the utility of routine postoperative radiographs after lumbar spine fusion. That study concluded that routine postoperative radiographs in the presence of a normal physical examination rarely change the clinician's management of these patients. Our aim was to repeat this protocol in patients after cervical spine fusion. We hypothesized that routine postoperative radiographs are unnecessary in most cases after cervical spine fusion.
The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of routine postoperative cervical spine radiographs after cervical spine fusion as to whether they help to guide clinical decision making within the first postoperative year.
This is a retrospective chart review of 383 patients who underwent a cervical spine fusion over a 5-year period. Seven different surgeons performed the cervical spine fusions. Our review assessed a total of 1,155 postoperative clinic visits.
Each clinical postoperative visit was reviewed. The history and exam were graded as either normal or abnormal, and any plain radiographs obtained were graded similarly as either normal or abnormal. Each patient's notes were followed up to 1 year postoperatively. Each patient had to have at least two postoperative visits with X-rays to be included in the study. We then noted any further action taken by the clinician based on the appearance of the radiograph in conjunction with the history and exam.
In patients with normal history and exam presentations, further action was taken only 5/879 (0.57%) of the time, sometimes even in the presence of abnormal radiographs. The actions included two surgical revisions, two prolongations of cervical collar immobilization, and one patient who underwent a flexion/extension radiographic evaluation and subsequent prolonged cervical collar immobilization. There were 276 visits with abnormal history and exam; of these, 34/276 (12.3%) had abnormal X-rays. Of the clinic visits with abnormal history and exam and abnormal X-rays, 15/34 (44%) went on to revision.
Routine postoperative radiographs after cervical spine fusion rarely appear to be of value when patients present with a normal history and exam and may expose patients to unnecessary diagnostic studies and expenses. Patients exhibiting a normal postoperative history and exam are likely to have no further additional action taken in the presence of either normal or abnormal radiographs.
资深作者(JAG)最近发表了一篇质疑腰椎融合术后常规术后 X 光片的实用性的文章。该研究得出的结论是,在体格检查正常的情况下,常规术后 X 光片很少改变医生对这些患者的治疗方案。我们的目的是在颈椎融合术后患者中重复这一方案。我们假设,在大多数情况下,颈椎融合术后常规术后 X 光片是不必要的。
本研究旨在确定颈椎融合术后常规颈椎 X 光片的有用性,以确定其是否有助于指导术后第一年的临床决策。
这是一项回顾性图表研究,共纳入 5 年内接受颈椎融合术的 383 例患者。7 位不同的外科医生进行了颈椎融合术。我们的研究共评估了 1155 次术后就诊。
回顾每个临床术后就诊的情况。病史和体格检查结果分为正常或异常,获得的任何平片也分为正常或异常。随访每位患者术后 1 年。每位患者必须至少有 2 次术后 X 光检查才能纳入研究。然后,我们根据 X 光片的外观以及病史和体格检查结果,记录医生采取的任何进一步措施。
在病史和体格检查表现正常的患者中,只有 5/879(0.57%)的情况下会进一步采取行动,有时即使 X 光片异常也是如此。这些行动包括 2 次手术修正、2 次延长颈椎固定、1 次患者进行屈伸位 X 光评估和随后延长颈椎固定。有 276 次就诊表现为病史和体格检查异常;其中,34/276(12.3%)的 X 光片异常。在病史和体格检查异常且 X 光片异常的就诊中,15/34(44%)进行了修正。
当患者的病史和体格检查正常时,颈椎融合术后的常规术后 X 光片似乎很少有价值,并且可能使患者暴露于不必要的诊断性研究和费用中。表现出正常术后病史和体格检查的患者在存在正常或异常 X 光片的情况下,可能不会采取进一步的行动。