Suppr超能文献

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后一天进行常规X光检查既无必要,也不具有成本效益。

Routine radiographs one day after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion are neither necessary nor cost-effective.

作者信息

Martin Sean C, Dabbous Bassam O, Ridgeon Elliott E, Magdum Shailendra A, Cadoux-Hudson Thomas A D, Pereira Erlick A C

机构信息

a Department of Neurological Surgery , Oxford University Hospitals , Oxford , UK.

b Academic Neurosurgery Unit, St. George's , University of London , London , UK.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;31(1):50-53. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2016.1233320. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common operative treatment of compressive pathology of the cervical spinal cord, when caused by one or more degenerated intervertebral discs or related osteophytes. In addition to intra-operative radiographs to confirm spinal level before discectomy and implant position after insertion, traditional practice is to obtain post-operative antero-posterior and lateral plain radiographs (XR) before hospital discharge, despite a paucity of evidence supporting their benefit to patient care. Minimising unnecessary radiation to radiosensitive neck structures is desirable, and furthermore, with increasing financial pressure on healthcare resources, routine investigations should be clinically justified and evidence-based. We aim to compare the utility of routine post-operative cervical spine X-rays following ACDF.

METHODS

We compare two groups of consecutive patients undergoing ACDF in a single UK neurosurgical centre. The first group (n = 109) received routine post-operative XR imaging, and the second group (n = 113) received radiographs only when clinically indicated.

RESULTS

There were no differences in post-operative complication rates (4.6% vs. 5.3%), or requirement for further imaging or of further operative intervention (1.8% vs. 0.9%). The group that did not have routine post-operative radiographs had a significantly shorter stay in hospital (median two days vs. three days). There were no patients in either group where post-operative XR changed clinical management and mandated revision surgery or further imaging. All cases requiring surgery or further imaging were identified by clinical deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that the practice of obtaining routine radiographs of the cervical spine following ACDF should be abandoned, unless there is a clear clinical indication.

摘要

目的

当颈椎脊髓受压病变由一个或多个退变椎间盘或相关骨赘引起时,颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是一种常见的手术治疗方法。除了术中X线片用于在椎间盘切除术前确认脊柱节段以及植入物插入后确认其位置外,传统做法是在出院前获取术后正位和侧位X线平片(XR),尽管缺乏证据支持其对患者护理有益。尽量减少对颈部放射敏感结构的不必要辐射是可取的,此外,随着医疗资源面临的经济压力不断增加,常规检查应有临床依据且基于证据。我们旨在比较ACDF术后常规颈椎X线检查的效用。

方法

我们比较了在英国一个神经外科中心连续接受ACDF的两组患者。第一组(n = 109)接受了术后常规XR成像,第二组(n = 113)仅在有临床指征时接受X线片检查。

结果

术后并发症发生率(4.6%对5.3%)、进一步影像学检查或进一步手术干预的需求(1.8%对0.9%)无差异。未进行术后常规X线检查的组住院时间明显更短(中位时间为2天对3天)。两组均没有患者因术后XR改变临床管理并要求进行翻修手术或进一步影像学检查。所有需要手术或进一步影像学检查的病例均通过临床病情恶化得以识别。

结论

我们建议,除非有明确的临床指征,否则应摒弃ACDF术后常规拍摄颈椎X线片的做法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验