Suppr超能文献

基于单克隆抗体的试纸条检测法:一种使用人血清和尿液样本诊断曼氏血吸虫感染的可靠的现场适用技术。

Monoclonal antibody-based dipstick assay: a reliable field applicable technique for diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni infection using human serum and urine samples.

作者信息

Demerdash Zeinab, Mohamed Salwa, Hendawy Mohamed, Rabia Ibrahim, Attia Mohy, Shaker Zeinab, Diab Tarek M

机构信息

Immunology Department, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, 12411 Giza, Egypt.

出版信息

Korean J Parasitol. 2013 Feb;51(1):93-8. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.1.93. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

Abstract

A field applicable diagnostic technique, the dipstick assay, was evaluated for its sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing human Schistosoma mansoni infection. A monoclonal antibody (mAb) against S. mansoni adult worm tegumental antigen (AWTA) was employed in dipstick and sandwich ELISA for detection of circulating schistosome antigen (CSA) in both serum and urine samples. Based on clinical and parasitological examinations, 60 S. mansoni-infected patients, 30 patients infected with parasites other than schistosomiasis, and 30 uninfected healthy individuals were selected. The sensitivity and specificity of dipstick assay in urine samples were 86.7% and 90.0%, respectively, compared to 90.0% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity of sandwich ELISA. In serum samples, the sensitivity and specificity were 88.3% and 91.7% for dipstick assay vs. 91.7% and 95.0% for sandwich ELISA, respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of dipstick assay in urine and serum samples was 88.3% and 90.0%, while it was 90.8% and 93.3% for sandwich ELISA, respectively. The diagnostic indices of dipstick assay and ELISA either in serum or in urine were statistically comparable (P>0.05). In conclusion, the dipstick assay offers an alternative simple, rapid, non-invasive technique in detecting CSA or complement to stool examinations especially in field studies.

摘要

对一种可现场应用的诊断技术——试纸条检测法,评估了其在诊断曼氏血吸虫感染中的敏感性和特异性。一种针对曼氏血吸虫成虫体表抗原(AWTA)的单克隆抗体(mAb)被用于试纸条检测法和夹心酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)中,以检测血清和尿液样本中的循环血吸虫抗原(CSA)。根据临床和寄生虫学检查,选取了60名曼氏血吸虫感染患者、30名感染了除血吸虫病之外其他寄生虫的患者以及30名未感染的健康个体。与夹心ELISA的敏感性90.0%和特异性91.7%相比,试纸条检测法在尿液样本中的敏感性和特异性分别为86.7%和90.0%。在血清样本中,试纸条检测法的敏感性和特异性分别为88.3%和91.7%,而夹心ELISA的敏感性和特异性分别为91.7%和95.0%。试纸条检测法在尿液和血清样本中的诊断效能分别为88.3%和90.0%,而夹心ELISA在尿液和血清样本中的诊断效能分别为90.8%和93.3%。试纸条检测法和ELISA在血清或尿液中的诊断指标在统计学上具有可比性(P>0.05)。总之,试纸条检测法提供了一种简单、快速、非侵入性的检测CSA的替代技术,或可作为粪便检查的补充,尤其是在现场研究中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d3b/3587756/89d58cc0506c/kjp-51-93-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验