Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;48(12):973-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091441. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
The goal of this meta-analysis was to aggregate available empirical studies on the effects of physical exercise on executive functions in preadolescent children (6-12 years of age), adolescents (13-17 years of age) and young adults (18-35 years of age).
The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE and SPORTDiscus were searched for relevant studies reporting on the effects of physical exercise on executive functions. Nineteen studies were selected.
There was a significant overall effect of acute physical exercise on executive functions (d=0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.76, p<0.001). There were no significant differences between the three age groups (Q (2)=0.13, p=0.94). Furthermore, no significant overall effect of chronic physical exercise (d=0.14, 95%CI -0.04 to 0.32, p=0.19) on executive functions (Q (1)=5.08, p<0.05) was found. Meta-analytic effect sizes were calculated for the effects of acute physical exercise on the domain's inhibition/interference control (d=0.46, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.60, p<0.001) and working memory (d=0.05, 95% CI -0.51 to 0.61, p=0.86) as well as for the effects of chronic physical exercise on planning (d=0.16, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.89, p=0.18).
Results suggest that acute physical exercise enhances executive functioning. The number of studies on chronic physical exercise is limited and it should be investigated whether chronic physical exercise shows effects on executive functions comparable to acute physical exercise. This is highly relevant in preadolescent children and adolescents, given the importance of well-developed executive functions for daily life functioning and the current increase in sedentary behaviour in these age groups.
本荟萃分析的目的是综合现有关于体育锻炼对 6-12 岁、13-17 岁和 18-35 岁青少年前儿童执行功能影响的实证研究。
检索电子数据库 PubMed、EMBASE 和 SPORTDiscus,以查找报告体育锻炼对执行功能影响的相关研究。选择了 19 项研究。
急性体育锻炼对执行功能有显著的总体影响(d=0.52,95%CI 0.29-0.76,p<0.001)。三个年龄组之间没有显著差异(Q (2)=0.13,p=0.94)。此外,慢性体育锻炼(d=0.14,95%CI -0.04-0.32,p=0.19)对执行功能没有显著的总体影响(Q (1)=5.08,p<0.05)。计算了急性体育锻炼对抑制/干扰控制(d=0.46,95%CI 0.33-0.60,p<0.001)和工作记忆(d=0.05,95%CI -0.51-0.61,p=0.86)域以及慢性体育锻炼对计划(d=0.16,95%CI 0.18-0.89,p=0.18)的影响的荟萃分析效应大小。
结果表明,急性体育锻炼可增强执行功能。关于慢性体育锻炼的研究数量有限,应研究慢性体育锻炼对执行功能的影响是否与急性体育锻炼相当。鉴于执行功能对日常生活功能的重要性以及当前这些年龄组久坐行为的增加,这对于青少年前儿童和青少年来说尤为重要。