Department of Physical Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;53(22):1397-1404. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099825. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
To synthesise randomised controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effects of chronic exercise interventions on different domain-specific executive functions (EFs) among children and adolescents.
Systematic review with meta-analysis.
PsycINFO, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Academic Search Premier, Embase and Web of Science were searched.
RCTs or cluster RCT design, which employ chronic exercise interventions and target healthy children (age 6-12 years) and adolescents (age 13-17 years). We defined chronic exercise as physical activity (PA) which consists of multiple exercise sessions per week and lasts for an extended period of time (typically over 6 weeks).
We included 19 studies, with a total of 5038 participants. The results showed that chronic exercise interventions improved overall EFs (standardised mean difference (SMD)=0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.30, p<0.05) and inhibitory control (SMD=0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.45, P<0.05). In meta regression, higher body mass index was associated with greater improvements in overall EFs performance (β=0.03, 95% CI 0.0002 to 0.06, p<0.05), whereas age and exercise duration were not. In subgroup analysis by intervention modality, sports and PA programme (SMD=0.21, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.31, p<0.05) and curricular PA (SMD=0.39, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.69, p<0.05) improved overall EFs performance, but integrated PA did not (SMD=0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.09, p>0.05). Interventions with a session length < 90 minutes improved overall EFs performance (SMD=0.24, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.39, p=0.02), but session length ≥ 90 minutes did not (SMD=0.05, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.14). No other moderator was found to have an effect.
Despite small effect sizes, chronic exercise interventions, implemented in curricular or sports and PA programme settings, might be a promising way to promote multiple aspects of executive functions, especially inhibitory control.
综合随机对照试验(RCT),以了解慢性运动干预对儿童和青少年不同特定领域执行功能(EF)的影响。
系统评价与荟萃分析。
PsycINFO、PubMed、SPORTDiscus、Academic Search Premier、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行了检索。
RCT 或聚类 RCT 设计,采用慢性运动干预,针对健康儿童(6-12 岁)和青少年(13-17 岁)。我们将慢性运动定义为每周进行多次运动且持续较长时间(通常超过 6 周)的身体活动(PA)。
我们纳入了 19 项研究,共计 5038 名参与者。结果表明,慢性运动干预可改善整体执行功能(标准化均数差(SMD)=0.20,95%置信区间[CI]0.09 至 0.30,p<0.05)和抑制控制(SMD=0.26,95%CI 0.08 至 0.45,P<0.05)。在荟萃回归分析中,较高的体重指数与整体执行功能表现的更大改善相关(β=0.03,95%CI 0.0002 至 0.06,p<0.05),而年龄和运动持续时间则无此关联。按干预方式进行亚组分析,运动和 PA 计划(SMD=0.21,95%CI 0.12 至 0.31,p<0.05)和课程 PA(SMD=0.39,95%CI 0.08 至 0.69,p<0.05)可改善整体执行功能表现,但综合 PA 则不能(SMD=0.02,95%CI -0.05 至 0.09,p>0.05)。时长<90 分钟的干预可改善整体执行功能表现(SMD=0.24,95%CI 0.10 至 0.39,p=0.02),而时长≥90 分钟的干预则不能(SMD=0.05,95%CI -0.03 至 0.14)。未发现其他调节因素有影响。
尽管效应量较小,但在课程或运动和 PA 计划环境中实施的慢性运动干预可能是促进执行功能多个方面,特别是抑制控制的一种有前途的方法。