• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人单部位子宫切除术治疗低危子宫内膜癌:一项初步研究。

Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study.

机构信息

Gynecologic Oncologic Unit, Department of Oncological Surgery, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2759-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2922-9. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-013-2922-9
PMID:23468046
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the feasibility and the safety of robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) in low risk early endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Patients with clinical low risk early endometrial cancer were enrolled onto a prospective cohort trial. All surgical procedures were performed through a single 2-2.5 cm umbilical incision, with a multichannel system consisting of a five-lumen port providing access for two single-site instruments (da Vinci Si Surgical System, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), the 8.5 mm 3D HD endoscope, a 5/10 mm accessory port, and an insufflation adaptor.

RESULTS

Between December 2011 and June 2012, a total of 17 patients were included in our pilot study. The median age of the patients was 64 years (range, 42-84 years), and median body mass index was 26.6 kg/m(2) (range, 18-52 kg/m(2)). One patient was excluded from the study as a result of pelvic metastasis during inspection of abdominal cavity, and another patient was converted to vaginal surgery as a result of problems of hypercapnia. The median docking time, console time, and total operative time was 8 min (range, 5-14 min), 48 min (range, 45-51 min), and 90 min (range, 70-147 min), respectively. The median blood loss was 75 mL (range, 50-150 mL). No laparoscopy/laparotomy conversion was registered. The median time to discharge was 2 days (range, 1-3 days). Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications occurred. At a median of 7.5 months' follow-up, all patients were disease-free.

CONCLUSIONS

RSSH is technically feasible in patients affected by low risk early endometrial cancer. Additional studies with gynecologic oncologic cases should be performed to explore the possible benefits of RSSH.

摘要

背景

评估机器人单部位子宫切除术(RSSH)在低危早期子宫内膜癌中的可行性和安全性。

方法

临床低危早期子宫内膜癌患者入组前瞻性队列研究。所有手术均通过单个 2-2.5cm 脐部切口进行,采用多通道系统,包括一个五腔端口,为两个单部位器械(达芬奇 Si 外科系统,直觉外科公司,加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔)、8.5mm 3D HD 内窥镜、5/10mm 辅助端口和一个充气适配器提供通道。

结果

2011 年 12 月至 2012 年 6 月,共有 17 例患者入组我们的初步研究。患者的中位年龄为 64 岁(范围,42-84 岁),中位体重指数为 26.6kg/m²(范围,18-52kg/m²)。1 例患者因腹部探查时发现盆腔转移而被排除在研究之外,另 1 例患者因高碳酸血症问题转为阴道手术。中位对接时间、控制台时间和总手术时间分别为 8 分钟(范围,5-14 分钟)、48 分钟(范围,45-51 分钟)和 90 分钟(范围,70-147 分钟)。中位出血量为 75ml(范围,50-150ml)。无腹腔镜/剖腹术中转。中位出院时间为 2 天(范围,1-3 天)。术中或术后均无并发症发生。中位随访 7.5 个月,所有患者均无疾病。

结论

RSSH 对低危早期子宫内膜癌患者具有技术可行性。应开展更多妇科肿瘤病例的研究,以探索 RSSH 的可能益处。

相似文献

1
Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study.机器人单部位子宫切除术治疗低危子宫内膜癌:一项初步研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2759-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2922-9. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
2
Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.机器人辅助后腹腔镜单孔入路肾上腺切除术:技术可行性及初步结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2741-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
3
Robotic single-site pelvic lymphadenectomy.机器人单部位盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Sep;134(3):631. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.027. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
4
Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.接受计算机辅助(“机器人”)和标准腹腔镜手术治疗新发子宫内膜癌患者的术后疼痛药物需求。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3561-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3064-9.
5
Robotic single site staging in endometrial cancer: A multi-institution study.子宫内膜癌的机器人单孔分期:一项多机构研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;42(10):1506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
6
Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.妇科机器人腹腔镜单孔手术:可行性、安全性和技术的前瞻性分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):179.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
7
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.经肛门入路机器人辅助吻合术联合或不联合经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:先经肛门入路,再行机器人手术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
8
Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSS-H) vs. laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESS-H) in early endometrial cancer: a double-institution case-control study.机器人单孔子宫切除术(RSS-H)与腹腔镜单孔子宫切除术(LESS-H)治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较:一项双中心病例对照研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jul;130(1):219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
9
Robotic single-port hysterectomy, adnexectomy, and lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌的机器人单孔子宫切除术、附件切除术及淋巴结清扫术
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):322. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
10
Robot-assisted Sistrunk's operation, total thyroidectomy, and neck dissection via a transaxillary and retroauricular (TARA) approach in papillary carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct cyst and thyroid gland.经腋后(TARA)入路机器人辅助施行 Sistrunk 手术、甲状腺全切除术和颈淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状舌管囊肿和甲状腺起源的乳头状癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4259-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2674-y. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Single-Port Versus Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Early Endometrial Cancer: A Case Control Study.早期子宫内膜癌的机器人单孔与机器人单部位子宫切除术:一项病例对照研究。
Int J Med Robot. 2025 Oct;21(5):e70107. doi: 10.1002/rcs.70107.
2
Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫内膜癌中机器人单孔与机器人多孔子宫切除术的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13968-6.
3
The efficacy and safety of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery conventional five-port laparoscopic surgery for duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection.
单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术与传统五孔腹腔镜手术用于保留十二指肠的胰头切除术的疗效及安全性比较
Gland Surg. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1448-1458. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-200. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
Comparison of efficacy of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic treatment for uterine leiomyoma: a latest meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效比较:一项最新的荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 2;13:1192582. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1192582. eCollection 2023.
5
Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人单孔与多孔子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌的手术结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 Feb 6;15(2):e34702. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34702. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
A Comparative Analysis of Robotic Single-Site Surgery and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery as Therapeutic Options for Stage IB1 Cervical Squamous Carcinoma.机器人单孔手术与腹腔镜单孔手术作为IB1期宫颈鳞癌治疗选择的比较分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Apr 21;13:3485-3492. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S299827. eCollection 2021.
7
The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.用于妇科手术的机器人单孔平台:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1155-1167. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00812-8. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Robotic Single-Port Platform in General, Urologic, and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis.机器人单孔平台在普通外科、泌尿科和妇科手术中的应用:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2019 Oct;43(10):2401-2419. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05049-0.
9
Robotic single-site staging operation for early-stage endometrial cancer: initial experience at a single institution.早期子宫内膜癌的机器人单孔分期手术:单机构的初步经验
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019 May;62(3):149-156. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.3.149. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
10
Robotic single-site surgery for mature cyst teratoma cystectomy: an initial case series study in a single medical center in China.机器人单孔手术用于成熟性囊性畸胎瘤囊肿切除术:中国某单一医疗中心的初步病例系列研究
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Jan 24;15:179-185. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S176852. eCollection 2019.