Center on Health Disparities, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Med Educ Online. 2013 Mar 6;18:1-5. doi: 10.3402/meo.v18i0.20438.
The purpose of this study is to describe an approach for evaluating assessments used in the first 2 years of medical school and report the results of applying this method to current first and second year medical student examinations.
Three faculty members coded all exam questions administered during the first 2 years of medical school. The reviewers discussed and compared the coded exam questions. During the bi-monthly meetings, all differences in coding were resolved with consensus as the final criterion. We applied Moore's framework to assist the review process and to align it with National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) standards.
The first and second year medical school examinations had 0% of competence level questions. The majority, more than 50% of test questions, were at the NBME recall level.
It is essential that multiple-choice questions (MCQs) test the attitudes, skills, knowledge, and competency in medical school. Based on our findings, it is evident that our exams need to be improved to better prepare our medical students for successful completion of NBME step exams.
本研究旨在描述一种评估医学专业前 2 年使用的评估方法,并报告将该方法应用于当前第一和第二年医学生考试的结果。
三位教师对医学院前 2 年所授课程的所有考试问题进行编码。审查员对编码后的考试问题进行讨论和比较。在双月会议期间,通过达成共识作为最终标准来解决所有编码差异。我们应用摩尔的框架来协助审查过程,并使其与美国医师执照考试委员会(NBME)的标准保持一致。
第一年和第二年的医学院考试没有达到能力水平的问题,占 0%。大多数(超过 50%)测试问题都属于 NBME 回忆水平。
多项选择题(MCQ)必须检验医学院的态度、技能、知识和能力。根据我们的发现,很明显,我们的考试需要改进,以更好地帮助我们的医学生成功完成 NBME 步骤考试。