Centre for Psychology of Religion, Innlandet Hospital Trust (SIHF), Hamar, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 6;3(3):e002283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002283.
To investigate general practitioners' (GPs) experiences in managing patients with intellectual disabilities (ID) and mental and behavioural problems (MBP).
Qualitative study using in-depth interviews.
General practice in Hedmark county, Norway.
10 GPs were qualitatively interviewed about their professional experience regarding patients with ID and MBP. Data were analysed by all authors using systematic text condensation.
The participants' knowledge was primarily experience-based and collaboration with specialists seemed to be individual rather than systemic. The GPs provided divergent attitudes to referral, treatment, collaboration, regular health checks and home visits.
GPs are in a position to provide evidence-based and individual treatment for both psychological and somatic problems among patients with ID. However, they do not appear to be making use of evidence-based treatment decisions. The GPs feel that they are left alone in decision-making, and find it difficult to find trustworthy collaborative partners. The findings in this study provide useful information for further research in the field.
调查全科医生(GP)在管理智力残疾(ID)和精神及行为问题(MBP)患者方面的经验。
使用深度访谈的定性研究。
挪威海德马克郡的全科医疗。
10 名全科医生接受了关于他们在管理 ID 和 MBP 患者方面的专业经验的定性访谈。所有作者均使用系统文本凝结法对数据进行分析。
参与者的知识主要基于经验,与专家的合作似乎是个体的,而不是系统性的。全科医生对转诊、治疗、合作、定期健康检查和家访的态度存在分歧。
全科医生有能力为 ID 患者的心理和躯体问题提供基于证据的个体化治疗。然而,他们似乎没有利用基于证据的治疗决策。全科医生感到在决策方面孤立无援,难以找到值得信赖的合作伙伴。本研究的结果为该领域的进一步研究提供了有用的信息。