Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy, Erasmus MC, 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):347-50. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1112.
To assess the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the exercise self-efficacy scale (ESES) in persons with spinal cord injury. This is the first independent study of ESES psychometric properties, and the first report on ESES test-retest reliability.
SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: A total of 53 Dutch persons with spinal cord injury.
Subjects completed the Dutch ESES twice, with 2 weeks between (ESES_1 and ESES_2). Subjects also completed the General self-efficacy scale (GSE), and a questionnaire regarding demographic characteristics and lesion characteristics. Psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the ESES were assessed and compared with those of the original English-language version.
The Dutch ESES was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's α for ESES_1 = 0.90, ESES_2 = 0.88). Test-retest reliability was adequate (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.89). For validity, a moderate, statistically significant correlation was found between ESES and the GSE (Spearman's ρ ESES_1 = 0.52, ESES_2 = 0.66, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the Dutch ESES were found to be similar to those of the original English version.
The results of this study support the use of the ESES as a reliable and valid measure of exercise self-efficacy.
评估荷兰语版运动自我效能量表（ESES）在脊髓损伤患者中的信度和效度。这是对 ESES 心理测量特性的首次独立研究，也是首次报告 ESES 重测信度。
受试者/患者：共 53 名荷兰脊髓损伤患者。
受试者两次完成荷兰语版 ESES，两次之间间隔 2 周（ESES_1 和 ESES_2）。受试者还完成了一般自我效能感量表（GSE）和一份关于人口统计学特征和损伤特征的问卷。评估了荷兰语版 ESES 的心理测量特性，并与原版英语版本进行了比较。
荷兰语版 ESES 具有良好的内部一致性（ESES_1 的 Cronbach's α 为 0.90，ESES_2 的 Cronbach's α 为 0.88）。重测信度良好（组内相关系数为 0.81，95%置信区间为 0.70-0.89）。对于有效性，ESES 与 GSE 之间存在中度、统计学显著的相关性（Spearman 的 ρ ESES_1 为 0.52，ESES_2 为 0.66，p < 0.01）。此外，荷兰语版 ESES 的心理测量特性与原版英语版本相似。
本研究结果支持使用 ESES 作为运动自我效能的可靠有效测量工具。
