Hoffmann Rasmus, Plug Iris, McKee Martin, Khoshaba Bernadette, Westerling Ragnar, Looman Caspar, Rey Gregoire, Jougla Eric, Luis Alfonso Jose, Lang Katrin, Pärna Kersti, Mackenbach Johan P
1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Oct;23(5):852-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt026. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
Governments have identified innovation in pharmaceuticals and medical technology as a priority for health policy. Although the contribution of medical care to health has been studied extensively in clinical settings, much less is known about its contribution to population health. We examine how innovations in the management of four circulatory disorders have influenced trends in cause-specific mortality at the population level.
Based on literature reviews, we selected six medical innovations with proven effectiveness against hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure and cerebrovascular disease. We combined data on the timing of these innovations and cause-specific mortality trends (1970-2005) from seven European countries. We sought to identify associations between the introduction of innovations and favourable changes in mortality, using Joinpoint-models based on linear spline regression.
For both ischaemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, the timing of medical innovations was associated with improved mortality in four out of five countries and five out of seven countries, respectively, depending on the innovation. This suggests that innovation has impacted positively on mortality at the population level. For hypertension and heart failure, such associations could not be identified.
Although improvements in cause-specific mortality coincide with the introduction of some innovations, this is not invariably true. This is likely to reflect the incremental effects of many interventions, the time taken for them to be adopted fully and the presence of contemporaneous changes in disease incidence. Research on the impact of medical innovations on population health is limited by unreliable data on their introduction.
各国政府已将制药和医疗技术创新确定为卫生政策的重点。尽管医疗保健对健康的贡献已在临床环境中得到广泛研究,但对于其对人群健康的贡献却知之甚少。我们研究了四种循环系统疾病管理方面的创新如何影响人群层面特定病因死亡率的趋势。
基于文献综述,我们选择了六种已证实对高血压、缺血性心脏病、心力衰竭和脑血管疾病有效的医疗创新。我们将这些创新的时间数据与来自七个欧洲国家的特定病因死亡率趋势(1970 - 2005年)相结合。我们试图使用基于线性样条回归的Joinpoint模型来确定创新的引入与死亡率的有利变化之间的关联。
对于缺血性心脏病和脑血管疾病,根据创新的不同,医疗创新的时间分别与五分之四个国家和七分之五个国家的死亡率改善相关。这表明创新对人群层面的死亡率产生了积极影响。对于高血压和心力衰竭,无法确定这种关联。
尽管特定病因死亡率的改善与一些创新的引入同时出现,但情况并非总是如此。这可能反映了许多干预措施的累积效应、它们被充分采用所需的时间以及疾病发病率的同期变化。关于医疗创新对人群健康影响的研究受到其引入数据不可靠的限制。