Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
Int J Public Health. 2014 Apr;59(2):341-50. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0507-9. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
Although the contribution of health care to survival from cancer has been studied extensively, much less is known about its contribution to population health. We examine how medical innovations have influenced trends in cause-specific mortality at the national level.
Based on literature reviews, we selected six innovations with proven effectiveness against cervical cancer, Hodgkin's disease, breast cancer, testicular cancer, and leukaemia. With data on the timing of innovations and cause-specific mortality (1970-2005) from seven European countries we identified associations between innovations and favourable changes in mortality.
For none of the five specific cancers, sufficient evidence for an association between introduction of innovations and a positive change in mortality could be found. The highest association was found between the introduction of Tamoxifen and breast cancer mortality.
The lack of evidence of health care effectiveness may be due to gradual improvements in treatment, to effects limited to certain age groups or cancer subtypes, and to contemporaneous changes in cancer incidence. Research on the impact of health care innovations on population health is limited by unreliable data on their introduction.
尽管医疗保健对癌症患者存活率的影响已得到广泛研究,但对其对人群健康的影响却知之甚少。我们研究了医疗创新如何影响国家层面特定病因死亡率的趋势。
基于文献综述,我们选择了六种已被证实对宫颈癌、霍奇金病、乳腺癌、睾丸癌和白血病有效的创新方法。我们利用来自七个欧洲国家的关于创新时间和特定病因死亡率(1970-2005 年)的数据,确定了创新与死亡率有利变化之间的关联。
在五种特定癌症中,都没有发现创新引入与死亡率积极变化之间存在关联的充分证据。在他莫昔芬和乳腺癌死亡率之间发现了最高的关联。
医疗保健有效性缺乏证据可能是由于治疗的逐渐改善、仅限于某些年龄组或癌症亚型的影响,以及癌症发病率的同时变化。对医疗保健创新对人群健康影响的研究受到其引入的不可靠数据的限制。