Suppr超能文献

开放式腹部管理:负压伤口疗法的临床结局和安全性的全国性研究。

Management of the open abdomen: a national study of clinical outcome and safety of negative pressure wound therapy.

机构信息

National Intestinal Failure Centre, Department of Surgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828b8bc8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine clinical outcome of open abdomen therapy and assess the influence of negative pressure wound therapy on outcome.

BACKGROUND

Leaving the abdomen open (laparostomy) is an option following laparotomy for severe abdominal sepsis or trauma. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has become a popular means of managing laparostomy wounds. It may facilitate nursing care and delayed primary wound closure but the evidence to support its use is poor and concern has arisen about the risk of intestinal fistulation from exposed bowel, leading to an increased risk of death.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of 578 patients treated with an open abdomen in 105 hospitals in the United Kingdom between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2011. Propensity analysis was used to compare adverse outcomes (fistulation, death, intestinal failure, bleeding requiring intervention) and delayed primary closure rates in patients who did and did not receive NPWT.

FINDINGS

The most common indication for an open abdomen (n = 398, 68.9%) was abdominal sepsis. Overall hospital mortality was 28.2%. The majority of patients (n = 355, 61.4%) were treated with NPWT. Intestinal fistulation [relative risk (RR) = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-1.58], death (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.64-1.20), bleeding (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.45-1.23), and intestinal failure (RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.64-1.57) were no more common in patients receiving NPWT, but the rate of delayed primary closure was significantly lower (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60-0.90, P = 0.002) when NPWT was used.

CONCLUSIONS

The indications for an open abdomen in the United Kingdom appear to be significantly different to those described in N. America, where its use in the management of trauma predominates. NPWT in patients with an open abdomen is not associated with an increase in mortality or intestinal fistulation. It is, however, associated with a reduced rate of delayed primary closure. Although this may be related to patient selection, NPWT may leave patients with abdominal wall defects that require further treatment.

摘要

目的

确定剖腹术后开放腹部治疗的临床结果,并评估负压伤口治疗对结果的影响。

背景

在严重腹部感染或创伤后进行剖腹术时,可选择将腹部敞开(剖腹术)。负压伤口治疗(NPWT)已成为管理剖腹术伤口的一种流行手段。它可能便于护理和延迟初次伤口闭合,但支持其使用的证据不足,并且担心暴露的肠管会导致肠瘘,从而增加死亡风险。

方法

对 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 6 月 30 日期间在英国 105 家医院接受剖腹术后开放性腹部治疗的 578 例患者进行前瞻性观察性研究。采用倾向分析比较接受和不接受 NPWT 的患者不良结局(瘘管、死亡、肠衰竭、需要干预的出血)和延迟初次闭合率。

结果

开放性腹部治疗的最常见指征(n = 398,68.9%)是腹部感染。总体住院死亡率为 28.2%。大多数患者(n = 355,61.4%)接受了 NPWT 治疗。肠瘘[相对风险(RR)= 0.83,95%置信区间(CI):0.44-1.58]、死亡(RR = 0.87,95% CI:0.64-1.20)、出血(RR = 0.74,95% CI:0.45-1.23)和肠衰竭(RR = 1.00,95% CI:0.64-1.57)在接受 NPWT 的患者中并不更常见,但当使用 NPWT 时,延迟初次闭合的发生率显著降低(RR = 0.74,95% CI:0.60-0.90,P = 0.002)。

结论

英国开放性腹部治疗的适应证似乎与北美大不相同,北美开放性腹部治疗主要用于创伤的治疗。在开放性腹部患者中使用 NPWT 并不会增加死亡率或肠瘘。然而,它与延迟初次闭合的发生率降低有关。尽管这可能与患者选择有关,但 NPWT 可能会导致腹壁缺陷,需要进一步治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验