文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

创伤剖腹术后开放性腹部的处理:动态筋膜牵引与负压伤口治疗系统的比较分析。

Management of Open Abdomen After Trauma Laparotomy: A Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Fascial Traction and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems.

机构信息

Division of Trauma Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L9-411, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.

Centre for Global Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2019 Dec;43(12):3044-3050. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05166-w.


DOI:10.1007/s00268-019-05166-w
PMID:31506714
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of the post-traumatic open abdomen (OA) using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) alone is associated with low rates of primary fascial closure. The abdominal reapproximation anchor (ABRA) system exerts dynamic medial fascial traction and may work synergistically with NPWT to facilitate primary fascial closure. METHODS: Patients with an OA following trauma laparotomy between 2009 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients treated with ABRA in conjunction with NPWT (ABRA) versus NPWT alone (NPWT) were compared in terms of primary fascial closure rate, number of surgeries to closure, tracheostomy duration, length of stay and incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify predictors of tracheostomy duration. RESULTS: We identified 48 patients [ABRA, 12 and NPWT, 36]. The ABRA group was significantly younger (25 vs. 37 years, p = 0.027) and included a lower proportion of males (58% vs. 89%, p = 0.032). Groups were similar with respect to the incidence of hollow viscus injury, injury severity score and abdominal abbreviated injury score. Compared to the NPWT group, the ABRA group had a significantly higher rate of primary fascial closure (100% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), fewer surgeries to abdominal closure (2 vs. 2.5, p = 0.023) and shorter duration of tracheostomy (15.5 vs. 36 days, p = 0.008). There were no differences in length of stay or incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. On multivariable linear regression, ABRA placement was an independent predictor of shorter tracheostomy duration, after adjusting for covariates (β = - 0.294, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: For the post-traumatic OA, ABRA coupled with NPWT achieves a higher rate of primary fascial closure compared to NPWT alone, while requiring fewer surgeries and a shorter duration of tracheostomy.

摘要

背景:单独使用负压伤口治疗(NPWT)治疗创伤后开放性腹部(OA),初次筋膜闭合率较低。腹侧复位锚(ABRA)系统可施加动态内侧筋膜牵引,与 NPWT 协同作用,促进初次筋膜闭合。

方法:从一个前瞻性维护的机构数据库中确定了 2009 年至 2018 年间创伤剖腹术后出现 OA 的患者。比较了 ABRA 联合 NPWT(ABRA 组)与 NPWT 单独治疗(NPWT 组)的初次筋膜闭合率、闭合手术次数、气管造口术持续时间、住院时间和肠-大气瘘发生率。进行多变量线性回归分析以确定气管造口术持续时间的预测因素。

结果:共纳入 48 例患者[ABRA 组 12 例,NPWT 组 36 例]。ABRA 组患者年龄明显较小(25 岁 vs. 37 岁,p=0.027),男性比例较低(58% vs. 89%,p=0.032)。两组在空腔脏器损伤、损伤严重程度评分和腹部损伤严重程度评分方面无显著差异。与 NPWT 组相比,ABRA 组初次筋膜闭合率显著更高(100% vs. 28%,p<0.001),闭合腹部手术次数更少(2 次 vs. 2.5 次,p=0.023),气管造口术持续时间更短(15.5 天 vs. 36 天,p=0.008)。两组的住院时间和肠-大气瘘发生率无显著差异。多变量线性回归分析显示,在调整了协变量后,ABRA 放置是气管造口术持续时间缩短的独立预测因素(β=-0.294,p=0.036)。

结论:对于创伤后 OA,ABRA 联合 NPWT 与单独使用 NPWT 相比,初次筋膜闭合率更高,手术次数更少,气管造口术持续时间更短。

相似文献

[1]
Management of Open Abdomen After Trauma Laparotomy: A Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Fascial Traction and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems.

World J Surg. 2019-12

[2]
Management of the open abdomen with the Abdominal Reapproximation Anchor dynamic fascial closure system.

Am J Surg. 2013-5

[3]
Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture.

Surg Endosc. 2014-3

[4]
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus modified Barker Vacuum Pack as temporary abdominal closure technique for Open Abdomen management: a four-year experience.

BMC Surg. 2017-7-21

[5]
Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure with Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Better Outcomes than Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure Alone: A Comparative Study.

World J Surg. 2018-6

[6]
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.

World J Surg. 2015-4

[7]
Dynamic closure techniques for treatment of an open abdomen: an update.

Hernia. 2020-4

[8]
Management of the open abdomen using combination therapy with ABRA and ABThera systems.

Can J Surg. 2014-10

[9]
Management and closure of the open abdomen after damage control laparotomy for trauma. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Injury. 2016-2

[10]
What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Early placement of a non-invasive, pressure-regulated, fascial reapproximation device improves reduction of the fascial gap in open abdomens: a retrospective cohort study.

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024-10-12

[2]
Case Report: Tissue Expanders-Another Tool in the Armamentarium for the Treatment of Complex Ventral Hernia.

J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024-9-20

[3]
Evaluating a novel vertical traction device for early closure in open abdomen management: a consecutive case series.

Front Surg. 2024-8-13

[4]
The temporary abdominal closure techniques used for trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023-4

[5]
Two surgeons' collaboration to close an extreme open abdomen with loss of domain utilizing the abdominal dynamic tissue system and porcine urinary bladder matrix.

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022-7-11

[6]
Early Initiation of a Standardized Open Abdomen Treatment With Vacuum Assisted Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Best Results.

Front Surg. 2021-2-9

[7]
Factors influencing the fascial closure rate after open abdomen treatment: Results from the European Hernia Society (EuraHS) Registry : Surgical technique matters.

Hernia. 2022-2

[8]
A modified negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of refractory wounds: A preliminary study.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020-7-10

[9]
Dynamic closure techniques for treatment of an open abdomen: an update.

Hernia. 2020-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Open abdomen and entero-atmospheric fistulae: An interim analysis from the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA).

Injury. 2019-1

[2]
Incidence and factors associated with development of heterotopic ossification after damage control laparotomy.

Injury. 2018-1

[3]
IROA: International Register of Open Abdomen, preliminary results.

World J Emerg Surg. 2017-2-21

[4]
Open abdomen in gastrointestinal surgery: Which technique is the best for temporary closure during damage control?

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016-8-27

[5]
What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016-9

[6]
Open repair of large abdominal wall hernias with and without components separation; an analysis from the ACS-NSQIP database.

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016-3-2

[7]
Management of the open abdomen using combination therapy with ABRA and ABThera systems.

Can J Surg. 2014-10

[8]
Comparative study of open abdomen treatment: ABThera™ vs. abdominal dressing™.

Hernia. 2015-4

[9]
Negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of the open abdomen and incidence of enteral fistulas: a retrospective bicentre analysis.

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013-10-28

[10]
Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: results from the prospective AAST Open Abdomen registry.

JAMA Surg. 2013-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索