• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放性腹部技术治疗患者中使用标准方法与负压伤口治疗(NPWT)的治疗效果比较。

Comparison of the effectiveness of the treatment using standard methods and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique.

作者信息

Szmyt Krzysztof, Łukasz Krokowicz, Bobkiewicz Adam, Cybułka Bartosz, Ledwosiński Witold, Gordon Maciej, Alammari Ahmed, Banasiewicz Tomasz, Drews Michał

出版信息

Pol Przegl Chir. 2015 Mar 1;87(1):22-30. doi: 10.1515/pjs-2015-0013.

DOI:10.1515/pjs-2015-0013
PMID:25803065
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Open abdomen technique is a surgical treatment in which the fascia and skin are left open in order to reduce the value of the intra-abdominal pressure. According to the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) normal values of the intra-abdominal pressure are between 5 and 7 mm Hg. Intra-abdominal hypertension occurs when the pressure value is equal to or exceeds 12 mm Hg. The aim of the study was to compare the results of the open abdomen treatment using standard methods and negative pressure wound therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was in the form of a retrospective analysis of the documentation of the patients treated with open abdomen technique. The study included 37 patients treated in the Department of General and Endocrine Surgery and Gastroenterological Oncology and in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of the Medical Sciences since 2009-2012. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 20) was treated with standard surgical procedures (laparostomy, repeated peritoneal cavity lavage) and group 2 (n =17) was treated using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). The analysed clinical data included the period of hospitalization and clinical outcome (survival vs death), the occurrence of enteroatmospheric fistulae, cyclical determination of the quantitative C-reactive protein levels.

RESULTS

The number of deaths during hospitalization in the group treated with NPWT was lower than in the group treated with standard methods (3 vs 9). The number of fistulae during hospitalization in the group treated with NPWT dropped as compared to the group treated using standard procedures (18% vs 70%). The decrease in the CRP levels was recorded in the group treated with NPWT and its increase - in the group treated with standard methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NPWT in patients requiring open abdomen treatment is reasonable due to the positive results with respect to survival rates and the decrease in the number of gastrointestinal fistulae. It is necessary to train the physicians in using this type of therapy in the form of workshops and in the clinical setting.

摘要

未标注

开放腹腔技术是一种外科治疗方法,即让筋膜和皮肤保持开放状态,以降低腹腔内压力值。根据世界腹腔间隔室综合征协会(WSACS)的标准,腹腔内压力的正常值在5至7毫米汞柱之间。当压力值等于或超过12毫米汞柱时,就会发生腹腔高压。本研究的目的是比较使用标准方法和负压伤口治疗的开放腹腔治疗结果。

材料与方法

本研究采用回顾性分析的形式,分析接受开放腹腔技术治疗的患者的病历资料。研究纳入了2009年至2012年期间在普通与内分泌外科、胃肠肿瘤学以及医学科学麻醉与重症监护科接受治疗的37例患者。患者分为两组:第1组(n = 20)采用标准外科手术(剖腹造口术、反复腹腔灌洗)进行治疗,第2组(n = 17)采用负压伤口治疗(NPWT)。分析的临床数据包括住院时间和临床结局(存活与死亡)、肠气瘘的发生情况、定量C反应蛋白水平的周期性测定。

结果

接受NPWT治疗的组在住院期间的死亡人数低于采用标准方法治疗的组(3例对9例)。与采用标准程序治疗的组相比,接受NPWT治疗的组在住院期间的瘘管数量有所下降(18%对70%)。接受NPWT治疗的组记录到C反应蛋白水平下降,而采用标准方法治疗的组C反应蛋白水平升高。

结论

对于需要开放腹腔治疗的患者,使用NPWT是合理的,因为在生存率和胃肠瘘数量减少方面取得了积极成果。有必要通过举办研讨会和在临床环境中培训医生如何使用这种治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effectiveness of the treatment using standard methods and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique.开放性腹部技术治疗患者中使用标准方法与负压伤口治疗(NPWT)的治疗效果比较。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2015 Mar 1;87(1):22-30. doi: 10.1515/pjs-2015-0013.
2
What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis.负压伤口治疗(NPWT)在接受开放腹部技术治疗的患者中的有效性如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):575-84. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001126.
3
Management of the open abdomen: a national study of clinical outcome and safety of negative pressure wound therapy.开放式腹部管理:负压伤口疗法的临床结局和安全性的全国性研究。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828b8bc8.
4
Greater Success of Primary Fascial Closure of the Open Abdomen: A Retrospective Study Analyzing Applied Surgical Techniques, Success of Fascial Closure, and Variables Affecting the Results.开放性腹部初次筋膜关闭术的更高成功率:一项分析应用手术技术、筋膜关闭成功率及影响结果变量的回顾性研究
Scand J Surg. 2017 Jun;106(2):145-151. doi: 10.1177/1457496916665542. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
5
Management of enteroatmospheric fistula with negative pressure wound therapy in open abdomen treatment: a multicentre observational study.肠-气腔瘘在开放式腹部治疗中应用负压伤口治疗的管理:一项多中心观察性研究。
Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):255-264. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12597. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Does Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for the Open Abdomen Benefit the Patient? A Retrospective Cohort Study.开放性腹部负压伤口治疗对患者有益吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2017 Jun;30(6):256-261. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000516196.19330.6f.
7
[Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Infectious Complications in Grade III Open Fractures].[负压伤口治疗对Ⅲ级开放性骨折感染并发症的影响]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016;83(2):117-22.
8
NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY (NPWT) FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LAPAROSTOMY WOUNDS: CASE SERIES.负压伤口治疗(NPWT)用于处理剖腹术后伤口:病例系列
East Afr Med J. 2013 Dec;90(12):409-12.
9
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus modified Barker Vacuum Pack as temporary abdominal closure technique for Open Abdomen management: a four-year experience.负压伤口治疗与改良巴克真空包装作为开放性腹部处理的临时腹部闭合技术:四年经验
BMC Surg. 2017 Jul 21;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0281-3.
10
Management of Open Abdomen After Trauma Laparotomy: A Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Fascial Traction and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems.创伤剖腹术后开放性腹部的处理:动态筋膜牵引与负压伤口治疗系统的比较分析。
World J Surg. 2019 Dec;43(12):3044-3050. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05166-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy on incidence rate of surgical site infection after stoma reversal: a pilot study.闭合切口负压伤口治疗对造口回纳术后手术部位感染发生率的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Dec;16(4):686-696. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.106426. Epub 2021 May 25.
2
Comprehensive analysis of lncRNA and miRNA expression profiles and ceRNA network construction in negative pressure wound therapy.负压伤口治疗中lncRNA和miRNA表达谱的综合分析及ceRNA网络构建
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Sep;9(17):1383. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3626.
3
Comparison of negative-pressure incision management system in wound dehiscence: A prospective, randomized, observational study.
负压切口管理系统在伤口裂开中的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、观察性研究。
J Med Life. 2019 Jul-Sep;12(3):276-283. doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-0033.
4
Pilot Study to Assess Safety and Usability of the Kyron NPWT System.评估凯龙负压伤口治疗系统安全性和易用性的初步研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Aug 12;7(8):e2334. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002334. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
EHS clinical guidelines on the management of the abdominal wall in the context of the open or burst abdomen.EHS关于开放性或腹壁破裂情况下腹壁管理的临床指南。
Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):921-939. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1818-9. Epub 2018 Sep 3.