Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis 55408, USA.
J Sex Res. 2013;50(3-4):329-52. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.746279.
Scientific interest in the measurement of homophobia and internalized homophobia has grown over the past 30 years, and new instruments and terms have emerged. To help researchers with the challenging task of identifying appropriate measures for studies in sexual-minority health, we reviewed measures of homophobia published in the academic literature from 1970 to 2012. Instruments that measured attitudes toward male homosexuals/homosexuality or measured homosexuals' internalized attitudes toward homosexuality were identified using measurement manuals and a systematic review. A total of 23 instruments met criteria for inclusion, and their features were summarized and compared. All 23 instruments met minimal criteria for adequate scale construction, including scale development, sampling, reliability, and evidence of validity. Validity evidence was diverse and was categorized as interaction with gay men, HIV/AIDS variables, mental health, and conservative religious or political beliefs. Homophobia was additionally correlated with authoritarianism and bias, gender ideology, gender differences, and reactions to homosexual stimuli. Internalized homophobia was validated by examining relationships with disclosing one's homosexuality and level of homosexual identity development. We hope this review will make the process of instrument selection more efficient by allowing researchers to easily locate, evaluate, and choose the proper measure based on their research question and population of interest.
过去 30 年来,科学界对恐同症和内化恐同症的测量越来越感兴趣,新的工具和术语也不断涌现。为了帮助研究人员在性少数群体健康研究中确定适当的测量方法,我们回顾了 1970 年至 2012 年发表的学术文献中关于恐同症的测量方法。我们使用测量手册和系统评价,确定了测量男性同性恋者/同性恋态度或测量同性恋者内化同性恋态度的工具。共有 23 种工具符合纳入标准,对其特征进行了总结和比较。所有 23 种工具都符合充分的量表构建的最低标准,包括量表编制、抽样、信度和效度证据。效度证据多种多样,可分为与男同性恋者的互动、艾滋病毒/艾滋病变量、心理健康、以及保守的宗教或政治信仰。此外,恐同症还与独裁主义和偏见、性别意识形态、性别差异以及对同性恋刺激的反应有关。通过考察与披露同性恋身份和同性恋认同发展水平的关系,验证了内化恐同症。我们希望通过这种方式,使研究人员能够根据自己的研究问题和感兴趣的人群,轻松地定位、评估和选择适当的测量方法,从而提高工具选择的效率。