Andresen Josefine Bernhard, Graugaard Christian, Andersson Mikael, Frisch Morten
Project SEXUS Group, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Center for Sexology Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03211-5.
Homophobia is considered a central driver of minority stress, mental health problems and suicidality among non-heterosexual people. We used baseline questionnaire data from 31,808 participants aged 15-89 years in the nationally representative Danish cohort study Project SEXUS to identify factors associated with moral disapproval of same-sex sexual behavior, an assumed proxy for homophobia. Respondents who answered that they did "not at all" or only "to a low extent" find same-sex sexual activity morally acceptable were operationally defined as expressing moral disapproval of same-sex sexual behavior, whereas respondents who considered same-sex sexual activity morally acceptable "to a high extent" or "to a very high extent" were considered not to hold such moral reservations. Demographically weighted prevalence estimates of sociodemographic, health-related, sexual, moral, and religious characteristics among individuals with and without moral reservations concerning same-sex sexual behavior were calculated and compared in polytomous logistic regression analyses. Overall, 21.7% (women: 14.4%; men: 29.2%) expressed moral disapproval of same-sex sexual behavior. Upon adjustment for potential confounding variables, such moral reservations were significantly positively associated with late sexual debut, low lifetime number of sex partners, lacking sex education in school, missing communication with parents about sex and, among men, a poor or non-existent sex life within the last year. Individuals expressing moral disapproval of same-sex sexual behavior also expressed significantly more restrictive moral attitudes toward other sexual matters. Religiousness was strongly positively associated with moral reservations concerning same-sex sexual behavior, most notably among followers of Islam, Jehovah's Witnesses, Danish Inner Mission, or a composite category of minor Christian denominations. In conclusion, even in a sexually liberal country such as Denmark, which decriminalized homosexuality in 1933 and legalized registered same-sex partnerships in 1989, moral disapproval of same-sex sexual behavior remains widespread. To reduce the negative mental health ramifications of homophobia and ensure the health and rights of all citizens, school-based sex education should stimulate social inclusion and destigmatization of sexual minorities, and religious communities should be encouraged to counter homophobia within and outside their circles.
恐同被认为是导致非异性恋者产生少数群体压力、心理健康问题和自杀倾向的主要因素。我们使用了丹麦具有全国代表性的队列研究“性研究项目”(Project SEXUS)中31808名年龄在15至89岁参与者的基线问卷调查数据,以确定与对同性性行为的道德不赞同相关的因素,这被视为恐同的一个假定替代指标。那些回答自己“完全不”或仅“在很低程度上”认为同性性行为在道德上可接受的受访者,在操作上被定义为表达了对同性性行为的道德不赞同,而那些认为同性性行为在道德上“在很大程度上”或“在非常大程度上”可接受的受访者则被认为没有这种道德保留。在多分类逻辑回归分析中,计算并比较了对同性性行为有或没有道德保留的个体在社会人口学、健康相关、性、道德和宗教特征方面的人口加权患病率估计值。总体而言,21.7%(女性:14.4%;男性:29.2%)表达了对同性性行为的道德不赞同。在对潜在混杂变量进行调整后,这种道德保留与初次性行为较晚、一生性伴侣数量较少、学校缺乏性教育、与父母缺乏关于性的沟通以及在男性中,过去一年性生活质量差或没有性生活显著正相关。对同性性行为表达道德不赞同的个体对其他性问题也表现出明显更具限制性的道德态度。宗教信仰与对同性性行为的道德保留呈强烈正相关,在伊斯兰教、耶和华见证人、丹麦内部传教团或基督教小教派的综合类别信徒中最为明显。总之,即使在丹麦这样一个性观念开放的国家,该国在1933年将同性恋非罪化,并于1989年将注册同性伴侣关系合法化,对同性性行为的道德不赞同仍然普遍存在。为了减少恐同对心理健康的负面影响并确保所有公民的健康和权利,以学校为基础的性教育应促进对性少数群体的社会包容和消除污名化,并且应鼓励宗教团体在其圈子内外反对恐同现象。