Porcino Antony J, Boon Heather S, Page Stacey A, Verhoef Marja J
School of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2013;6(1):15-24. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v6i1.168. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
Research on therapeutic massage bodywork (TMB) continues to expand, but few studies consider how research or knowledge translation may be affected by the lack of uniformly standardized competencies for most TMB therapies, by practitioner variability from training in different forms of TMB, or from the effects of experience on practice.
This study explores and describes how TMB practitioners practice, for the purpose of improving TMB training, practice, and research. PARTICIPANTS SETTING: 19 TMB practitioners trained in multiple TMB therapies, in Alberta, Canada.
Qualitative descriptive sub-analysis of interviews from a comprehensive project on the training and practice of TMB, focused on the delivery of TMB therapies in practice.
TWO BROAD THEMES EMERGED FROM THE DATA: (1) every treatment is individualized, and (2) each practitioner's practice of TMB therapies evolves. Individualization involves adapting treatment to the needs of the patient in the moment, based on deliberate and unconscious responses to verbal and nonverbal cues. Individualization starts with initial assessment and continues throughout the treatment encounter. Expertise is depicted as more nuanced and skilful individualization and treatment, evolved through experience, ongoing training, and spontaneous technique exploration. Practitioners consider such individualization and development of experience desirable. Furthermore, ongoing training and experience result in therapy application unique to each practitioner. Most practitioners believed they could not apply a TMB therapy without influence from other TMB therapies they had learned.
There are ramifications for research design, knowledge translation, and education. Few practitioners are likely able to administer treatments in the same way, and most would not like to practice without being able to individualize treatment. TMB clinical studies need to employ research methods that accommodate the complexity of clinical practice. TMB education should facilitate the maturation of practice skills and self-reflection, including the mindful integration of multiple TMB therapies.
治疗性按摩疗法(TMB)的研究在持续扩展,但很少有研究考虑到大多数TMB疗法缺乏统一标准化的能力、不同形式TMB培训导致的从业者差异,或经验对实践的影响可能如何影响研究或知识转化。
本研究旨在探索和描述TMB从业者的实践方式,以改进TMB培训、实践和研究。参与者及背景:19名在加拿大艾伯塔省接受过多种TMB疗法培训的TMB从业者。
对一项关于TMB培训与实践的综合项目中的访谈进行定性描述性子分析,重点关注TMB疗法在实践中的应用。
数据中出现了两个广泛的主题:(1)每次治疗都是个性化的,(2)每位TMB从业者对TMB疗法的实践都在演变。个性化包括根据对言语和非言语线索的有意和无意识反应,随时根据患者的需求调整治疗。个性化始于初始评估,并贯穿整个治疗过程。专业技能被描述为更细致入微和熟练的个性化及治疗方式,是通过经验、持续培训和自发的技术探索而演变而来的。从业者认为这种个性化和经验发展是可取的。此外,持续培训和经验导致每位从业者的治疗应用方式独特。大多数从业者认为,如果没有他们所学的其他TMB疗法的影响,他们就无法应用一种TMB疗法。
这对研究设计、知识转化和教育都有影响。很少有从业者能够以相同的方式进行治疗,而且大多数人不愿意在无法个性化治疗的情况下进行实践。TMB临床研究需要采用能够适应临床实践复杂性的研究方法。TMB教育应促进实践技能的成熟和自我反思,包括对多种TMB疗法的有意识整合。