Suppr超能文献

种族偏见与米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)

Racial bias and the MCMI.

作者信息

Choca J P, Shanley L A, Peterson C A, Van Denburg E

机构信息

Psychology Service, VA Lakeside Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60611.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1990 Summer;54(3-4):479-90. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674013.

Abstract

We studied the scores obtained on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) by Black and White male psychiatric inpatients to determine the presence or absence of racial bias. In predicting psychopathology for the two races, comparisons of MCMI performance indicated significant differences for all diagnoses except the personality disorders. The subjects were then matched into two groups of 209 patients each, according to DSM-III psychiatric diagnoses. The data were analyzed at the item, scale, and structural levels. At the item level, application of the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure revealed that 45 of the 175 items of the inventory were answered significantly different by the two racial groups. Because this number was higher than what could be expected by chance, the finding suggested possible deficiencies in terms of the culture-fairness of the items used in the test. At the scale level, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that the scores obtained by the Black and White groups were significantly different in 9 of the 20 scales (Histrionic, Narcissistic, Antisocial, Paraphrenia, Hypomania, Dysthymia, Alcohol Abuse, Drug Abuse, and Psychotic Delusion). With the exception of the Dysthymic scale, all of the differences were in the direction of the Blacks obtaining a higher score than the Whites. At the structural level, however, a principal components factor analysis performed on each group resulted in factor structures that looked identical.

摘要

我们研究了黑人和白人男性精神科住院患者在米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)上的得分,以确定种族偏见的存在与否。在预测两个种族的精神病理学情况时,MCMI表现的比较表明,除人格障碍外,所有诊断的得分均存在显著差异。然后根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)的精神科诊断,将受试者匹配成两组,每组209名患者。对数据在项目、量表和结构层面进行了分析。在项目层面,应用曼特尔-亨泽尔程序(Mantel-Haenszel Procedure)发现,该问卷175个项目中的45个项目,两个种族群体的回答存在显著差异。由于这个数字高于偶然预期的数字,这一发现表明该测试所使用项目在文化公平性方面可能存在缺陷。在量表层面,方差分析(ANOVA)表明,黑人组和白人组在20个量表中的9个量表(表演型、自恋型、反社会型、类偏执狂型、轻躁狂型、恶劣心境、酒精滥用、药物滥用和精神病性妄想)上获得的分数存在显著差异。除恶劣心境量表外,所有差异均表现为黑人得分高于白人。然而,在结构层面,对每组进行的主成分因子分析得出的因子结构看起来是相同的。

相似文献

1
Racial bias and the MCMI.种族偏见与米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)
J Pers Assess. 1990 Summer;54(3-4):479-90. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674013.
3
Accuracy of MCMI classification of angry and psychotic black and white patients.
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Jan;48(1):59-63. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199201)48:1<59::aid-jclp2270480108>3.0.co;2-z.
5
Test of MCMI black norms for five scales.MCMI黑色常模五个量表的测试。
J Clin Psychol. 1990 Mar;46(2):175-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199003)46:2<175::aid-jclp2270460208>3.0.co;2-q.
6
Validity of the MCMI Drug Abuse Scale varies as a function of drug choice, race, and axis II subtypes.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1991 Jun;17(2):153-9. doi: 10.3109/00952999108992818.
7
Age differences among psychiatric inpatients on the MCMI.住院精神科患者在明尼苏达多项人格调查表(MCMI)上的年龄差异。
J Clin Psychol. 1990 Nov;46(6):770-4. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199011)46:6<770::aid-jclp2270460611>3.0.co;2-i.
10
MCMI-II personality disorders in recent-onset bipolar disorders.近期起病的双相情感障碍中的米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)人格障碍
J Clin Psychol. 1992 May;48(3):320-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199205)48:3<320::aid-jclp2270480309>3.0.co;2-f.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验