• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版测量工具的米隆临床多轴问卷。

The MCMI as a measure of DSM-III.

作者信息

Widiger T A, Williams J B, Spitzer R L, Frances A

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1985 Aug;49(4):366-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4904_4.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa4904_4
PMID:4045683
Abstract

The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) has been interpreted as a measure of DSM-III disorders. However, the MCMI was constructed and validated primarily as a measure of Millon's (1969, 1981) taxonomy, not DSM-III. Comparison of the two taxonomies and examination of the MCMI's content validity for two of the MCMI scales indicate only a partial congruence between the Millon and DSM-III taxonomies. There has been no published empirical research concerning the relationship between the MCMI and DSM-III, and the derivation and cross-validation research for the MCMI scales employed Millon's taxonomy and not DSM-III. It is suggested that until such data have been presented one should be cautious in one's interpretation of the MCMI as a measure of DSM-III disorders.

摘要

米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)一直被视为对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)中各种障碍的一种测量工具。然而,MCMI主要是依据米隆(1969年、1981年)的分类法构建并验证的,而非DSM - III。对这两种分类法的比较以及对MCMI两个量表的内容效度的检验表明,米隆分类法与DSM - III分类法之间仅存在部分一致性。目前尚无关于MCMI与DSM - III之间关系的已发表实证研究,并且MCMI量表的推导和交叉验证研究采用的是米隆分类法而非DSM - III。建议在有此类数据呈现之前,人们在将MCMI解释为DSM - III障碍的测量工具时应谨慎行事。

相似文献

1
The MCMI as a measure of DSM-III.作为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版测量工具的米隆临床多轴问卷。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Aug;49(4):366-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4904_4.
2
The convergent and discriminant validity of the MCMI as a measure of the DSM-III personality disorders.作为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)人格障碍测量工具的米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)的收敛效度和区分效度。
J Pers Assess. 1987 Summer;51(2):228-42. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5102_7.
3
The MCMI provides a good assessment of DSM-III disorders: the MCMI-II will prove even better.米隆临床多轴量表(MCMI)对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)中的疾病提供了良好的评估:米隆临床多轴量表第二版(MCMI-II)将被证明甚至更好。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Aug;49(4):379-91. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4904_5.
4
Estimation of MCMI DSM-III axis II constructs from MMPI scales and subscales.从明尼苏达多项人格调查表(MMPI)量表及分量表估计米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)DSM-III轴II结构。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):195-201. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674058.
5
MCMI characteristics of DSM-III-R bulimics.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本中贪食症患者的米隆临床多轴问卷特征
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):477-83. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674085.
6
MCMI-II personality disorders in recent-onset bipolar disorders.近期起病的双相情感障碍中的米隆临床多轴问卷第二版(MCMI-II)人格障碍
J Clin Psychol. 1992 May;48(3):320-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199205)48:3<320::aid-jclp2270480309>3.0.co;2-f.
7
The relationship between the MCMI personality scales and DSM-III, axis II.米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)人格量表与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)轴II之间的关系。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):698-707. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674105.
8
MCMI-III diagnostic validity: bad test or bad validity study.米隆临床多轴问卷第三版(MCMI-III)的诊断效度:是测试不佳还是效度研究不佳。
J Pers Assess. 1996 Apr;66(2):431-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_19.
9
Evolution of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory.米隆临床多轴问卷的演变
J Pers Assess. 2015;97(6):541-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1055753. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
An update of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI).《米隆临床多轴问卷》(MCMI)的更新版。
J Clin Psychol. 1988 Sep;44(5):760-3. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198809)44:5<760::aid-jclp2270440516>3.0.co;2-c.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV (MCMI-IV).米隆临床多轴问卷第四版(MCMI-IV)波斯语版本的心理测量特性。
Iran J Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;16(1):43-51. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v16i1.5378.
2
Personality disorders and response to outpatient treatment of chronic pain.人格障碍与慢性疼痛门诊治疗的反应
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 1996 Sep;3(3):219-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01993908.