Reilly Jamie, Troche Joshua, Chatel Alison, Park Hyejin, Kalinyak-Fliszar Michelene, Antonucci Sharon M, Martin Nadine
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Aphasiology. 2012 Jan 1;26(3-4):404-427. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.616926. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
Verbal working memory is an essential component of many language functions, including sentence comprehension and word learning. As such, working memory has emerged as a domain of intense research interest both in aphasiology and in the broader field of cognitive neuroscience. The integrity of verbal working memory encoding relies on a fluid interaction between semantic and phonological processes. That is, we encode verbal detail using many cues related to both the sound and meaning of words. Lesion models can provide an effective means of parsing the contributions of phonological or semantic impairment to recall performance.
We employed the lesion model approach here by contrasting the nature of lexicality errors incurred during recall of word and nonword sequences by 3individuals with progressive nonfluent aphasia (a phonological dominant impairment) compared to that of 2 individuals with semantic dementia (a semantic dominant impairment). We focused on psycholinguistic attributes of correctly recalled stimuli relative to those that elicited a lexicality error (i.e., nonword → word OR word → nonword).
Patients with semantic dementia showed greater sensitivity to phonological attributes (e.g., phoneme length, wordlikeness) of the target items relative to semantic attributes (e.g., familiarity). Patients with PNFA showed the opposite pattern, marked by sensitivity to word frequency, age of acquisition, familiarity, and imageability.
We interpret these results in favor of a processing strategy such that in the context of a focal phonological impairment patients revert to an over-reliance on preserved semantic processing abilities. In contrast, a focal semantic impairment forces both reliance upon and hypersensitivity to phonological attributes of target words. We relate this interpretation to previous hypotheses about the nature of verbal short-term memory in progressive aphasia.
言语工作记忆是许多语言功能的重要组成部分,包括句子理解和词汇学习。因此,工作记忆已成为失语症学和更广泛的认知神经科学领域中一个备受关注的研究领域。言语工作记忆编码的完整性依赖于语义和语音过程之间的灵活交互。也就是说,我们使用与单词的声音和意义相关的许多线索来编码言语细节。损伤模型可以提供一种有效的方法来剖析语音或语义损伤对回忆表现的影响。
我们采用损伤模型方法,对比了3名进行性非流利性失语症患者(一种以语音为主的损伤)和2名语义性痴呆患者(一种以语义为主的损伤)在回忆单词和非单词序列时产生的词汇错误的性质。我们关注正确回忆的刺激与引发词汇错误的刺激(即非单词→单词或单词→非单词)的心理语言学属性。
与语义属性(如熟悉度)相比,语义性痴呆患者对目标项目的语音属性(如音素长度、似词程度)更为敏感。进行性非流利性失语症患者表现出相反的模式,其特点是对词频、习得年龄、熟悉度和可想象性敏感。
我们对这些结果的解释支持一种加工策略,即在局灶性语音损伤的情况下,患者会过度依赖保留的语义加工能力。相比之下,局灶性语义损伤会导致对目标单词的语音属性既依赖又过度敏感。我们将这一解释与先前关于进行性失语症中言语短期记忆本质的假设联系起来。