Jefferies Elizabeth, Hoffman Paul, Jones Roy, Ralph Matthew A Lambon
University of Manchester, UK.
J Mem Lang. 2008 Jan;58(1):66-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.004.
This study presents the first direct comparison of immediate serial recall in semantic dementia (SD) and transcortical sensory aphasia (TSA). Previous studies of the effect of semantic impairment on verbal short-term memory (STM) have led to important theoretical advances. However, different conclusions have been drawn from these two groups. This research aimed to explain these inconsistencies. We observed (a) qualitative differences between SD and TSA in the nature of the verbal STM impairment and (b) considerable variation within the TSA group. The SD and TSA patients all had poor semantic processing and good phonology. Reflecting this, both groups remained sensitive to phonological similarity and showed a reduced effect of lexicality in immediate serial recall. The SD patients showed normal serial position effects; in contrast, the TSA patients had poor recall of the initial list items and exhibited large recency effects on longer lists. The error patterns of the two groups differed: the SD patients made numerous phoneme migration errors whereas the TSA group were more likely to produce entire words in the wrong order, often initiating recall with terminal list items. The SD cases also showed somewhat larger effects of word frequency and imageability. We propose that these contrasting performance patterns are explicable in terms of the nature of the underlying semantic impairment. SD is associated with anterior lobe atrophy and produces degradation of semantic knowledge - this is more striking for less frequent/imageable items, accentuating the effects of these lexical/semantic variables in STM. SD patients frequently recombine the phonemes of different list items due to the reduced semantic constraint upon phonology (semantic binding: Patterson et al., 1994). In contrast, the semantic impairment in TSA follows frontal or temporoparietal lesions and is associated with poor executive control of semantic processing (deregulated semantic cognition: Jefferies and Lambon Ralph, 2006), explaining why these patients are liable to recall entire words out of serial order.
本研究首次对语义性痴呆(SD)和经皮质感觉性失语(TSA)的即时系列回忆进行了直接比较。先前关于语义损伤对言语短期记忆(STM)影响的研究取得了重要的理论进展。然而,这两组研究得出了不同的结论。本研究旨在解释这些不一致之处。我们观察到:(a)SD和TSA在言语STM损伤性质上存在质的差异;(b)TSA组内存在相当大的变异性。SD和TSA患者的语义加工能力均较差,但语音能力良好。反映在这一点上,两组对语音相似性均保持敏感,并且在即时系列回忆中词汇性效应减弱。SD患者表现出正常的系列位置效应;相比之下,TSA患者对列表开头项目的回忆较差,并且在较长列表中表现出较大的近因效应。两组的错误模式不同:SD患者出现大量音素迁移错误,而TSA组更有可能将整个单词顺序记错,且常常从列表末尾项目开始回忆。SD病例在词频和形象性方面的效应也略大。我们认为,这些截然不同的表现模式可以根据潜在语义损伤的性质来解释。SD与前叶萎缩相关,会导致语义知识退化——对于低频/形象性较差的项目,这种退化更为明显,从而增强了这些词汇/语义变量在STM中的效应。由于语音受到的语义约束减少(语义绑定:帕特森等人,1994年),SD患者经常重新组合不同列表项目的音素。相比之下,TSA的语义损伤继发于额叶或颞顶叶病变,与语义加工的执行控制不佳有关(语义认知失调:杰弗里斯和兰伯恩·拉尔夫,2006年),这就解释了为什么这些患者容易将整个单词顺序记错。