Hodges J R, Patterson K
University Neurology Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996 Nov;2(6):511-24. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700001685.
Two patients with nonfluent progressive aphasia, who have been studied longitudinally, are contrasted with a group of 5 patients with fluent progressive aphasia or semantic dementia. The most prominent feature of the nonfluent syndrome is the severe distortion of speech output with phonological errors and agrammatic sentence structure. This contrasts with the fluent, well articulated and syntactically correct, but empty, anomic speech found in semantic dementia. Performance on tests of comprehension separates the patient groups: The nonfluent patients show normal single-word comprehension, but marked impairment on tests of syntactic comprehension, while those with semantic dementia demonstrate the opposite pattern. Category fluency is severely defective in semantic dementia, but initial letter-based fluency is more impaired in the nonfluent syndrome. Performance on nonverbally mediated tests of semantic knowledge is impaired in semantic dementia only. The 2 forms of progressive aphasia have in common the sparing of perceptual and visuospatial skills, nonverbal problem solving abilities, and day-to-day (episodic) memory. Neuroradiological investigations have shown marked selective and striking inferolateral left temporal lobe atrophy in all 5 patients with semantic dementia. The changes in nonfluent progressive aphasia appear to be less focal and involve left perisylvian structures more diffusely. These 2 forms of progressive aphasia are, we argue, distinct in their manifestations.
两名患有非流畅性进行性失语症的患者,已接受纵向研究,与一组5名患有流畅性进行性失语症或语义性痴呆的患者进行对比。非流畅性综合征最突出的特征是言语输出严重扭曲,伴有语音错误和语法性句子结构。这与语义性痴呆中发现的流畅、发音清晰、句法正确但空洞、命名性失语的言语形成对比。理解测试的表现将患者群体区分开来:非流畅性患者单字理解正常,但句法理解测试有明显损伤,而语义性痴呆患者则表现出相反的模式。语义性痴呆中类别流畅性严重受损,但基于首字母的流畅性在非流畅性综合征中受损更严重。仅在语义性痴呆中,非言语介导的语义知识测试表现受损。这两种进行性失语症的形式在感知和视觉空间技能、非言语问题解决能力以及日常(情景)记忆方面均未受损。神经放射学研究显示,所有5名语义性痴呆患者均有明显的选择性和显著的左颞叶下外侧萎缩。非流畅性进行性失语症的变化似乎不那么局限,更广泛地累及左侧岛周结构。我们认为,这两种进行性失语症的形式在表现上是不同的。