• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

n 型 vs. u 型锯齿状是直接免疫荧光锯齿状分析中鉴别大疱性类天疱疮和获得性大疱性表皮松解症的一个可学习的标准。

The n- vs. u-serration is a learnable criterion to differentiate pemphigoid from epidermolysis bullosa acquisita in direct immunofluorescence serration pattern analysis.

机构信息

Center for Skin Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jul;169(1):100-5. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12308.

DOI:10.1111/bjd.12308
PMID:23489262
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serration pattern analysis of direct immunofluorescence (DIF) allows the differentiation of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita from other subtypes of pemphigoid. In daily practice its use is limited due to lack of experience and unfamiliarity.

OBJECTIVES

To test the learnability of DIF serrated-pattern recognition in groups with various a priori levels of competence.

METHODS

An online nversusu-test (www.nversusu.umcg.nl) was created, which contained 26 DIF images of the epidermal basement membrane zone, IgG stained and photographed with a magnification of × 40 and × 63. All images represented patients with a form of subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease. Thirteen DIF images were presented before and 13 DIF images after an instruction video about n- and u-serrated patterns. There were three options to choose from: n-serrated, u-serrated or undetermined. The test was completed by three groups of professionals: dermatology residents in training at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), international experts on bullous diseases, and dermatologists and pathologists who had participated in the Groningen blistering course during the past 10 years.

RESULTS

The overall number of correct answers of serration patterns was significantly higher after instruction than before instruction (median 9.0 correct answers vs. 11.0 correct answers, P < 0.001). Participants showed a mean improvement after instruction of 15.4% in the UMCG group (66.7% vs. 82.1%), 16.2% in the international expert group (67.2% vs. 83.4%) and 12.1% in the blistering course group (60.7% vs. 72.8%). The u-serrated pattern was better recognized than the n-serrated pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Serration pattern analysis by DIF can be learned irrespective of background of expertise.

摘要

背景

直接免疫荧光(DIF)的锯齿状模式分析可将获得性大疱性表皮松解症与其他类别的天疱疮区分开来。但在日常实践中,由于缺乏经验和不熟悉,其应用受到限制。

目的

测试不同专业背景的人群对 DIF 锯齿模式识别的可学习性。

方法

创建了一个在线 nversusu 测试(www.nversusu.umcg.nl),其中包含 26 张表皮基底膜区 IgG 染色的 DIF 图像,放大倍数为×40 和×63。所有图像均代表患有亚表皮自身免疫性大疱性疾病的患者。在观看有关 n-和 u-锯齿模式的教学视频之前,展示了 13 张 DIF 图像,之后又展示了 13 张。有 n-锯齿、u-锯齿和不确定三种选择。该测试由三组专业人员完成:格罗宁根大学医学中心(UMCG)的皮肤科住院医师、天疱疮国际专家,以及过去 10 年参加过格罗宁根水疱病课程的皮肤科医生和病理学家。

结果

指导后锯齿模式的总正确答案数明显高于指导前(中位数 9.0 个正确答案 vs. 11.0 个正确答案,P<0.001)。UMCG 组的指导后平均提高了 15.4%(66.7% vs. 82.1%),国际专家组提高了 16.2%(67.2% vs. 83.4%),水疱病课程组提高了 12.1%(60.7% vs. 72.8%)。u-锯齿模式比 n-锯齿模式更容易识别。

结论

DIF 的锯齿状模式分析可在不考虑专业背景的情况下进行学习。

相似文献

1
The n- vs. u-serration is a learnable criterion to differentiate pemphigoid from epidermolysis bullosa acquisita in direct immunofluorescence serration pattern analysis.n 型 vs. u 型锯齿状是直接免疫荧光锯齿状分析中鉴别大疱性类天疱疮和获得性大疱性表皮松解症的一个可学习的标准。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jul;169(1):100-5. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12308.
2
Serration pattern analysis for differentiating epidermolysis bullosa acquisita from other pemphigoid diseases.锯齿状模式分析在鉴别获得性大疱性表皮松解症与其他类天疱疮疾病中的作用。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Apr;78(4):754-759.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.029. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
3
Detection of u-serrated patterns in direct immunofluorescence images of autoimmune bullous diseases by inhibition-augmented COSFIRE filters.利用抑制增强型 COSFIRE 滤波器在自身免疫性大疱性疾病的直接免疫荧光图像中检测 u 锯齿状模式。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Feb;122:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
4
Accuracy of serration pattern analysis by direct immunofluorescence in subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases.直接免疫荧光法分析表皮下自身免疫性大疱病中锯齿状模式的准确性。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023 Aug 10:1-6. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_20_2023.
5
U-serrated immunodeposition pattern differentiates type VII collagen targeting bullous diseases from other subepidermal bullous autoimmune diseases.U 形锯齿状免疫沉积模式可将靶向 VII 型胶原蛋白的大疱性疾病与其他表皮下大疱性自身免疫性疾病区分开来。
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Jul;151(1):112-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06006.x.
6
A practical technique for differentiation of subepidermal bullous diseases: localization of in vivo-bound IgG by laser scanning confocal microscopy.一种鉴别表皮下大疱性疾病的实用技术:通过激光扫描共聚焦显微镜对体内结合的IgG进行定位
Arch Dermatol. 2003 Aug;139(8):1007-11. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.8.1007.
7
Distinguishing Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita From Bullous Pemphigoid Without Direct Immunofluorescence.在无直接免疫荧光情况下鉴别获得性大疱性表皮松解症与大疱性类天疱疮
J Cutan Med Surg. 2018 Jan/Feb;22(1):22-24. doi: 10.1177/1203475417722734. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
Use of Convolutional Neural Networks for the Detection of u-Serrated Patterns in Direct Immunofluorescence Images to Facilitate the Diagnosis of Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita.利用卷积神经网络检测直接免疫荧光图像中的 u 型锯齿状模式,以辅助获得性大疱性表皮松解症的诊断。
Am J Pathol. 2021 Sep;191(9):1520-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.05.024. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
9
Immunofluorescence serration pattern analysis as a diagnostic criterion in antilaminin-332 mucous membrane pemphigoid: immunopathological findings and clinical experience in 10 Dutch patients.免疫荧光锯齿状模式分析作为抗层粘连蛋白-332 黏膜性类天疱疮的诊断标准:10 例荷兰患者的免疫病理学发现和临床经验。
Br J Dermatol. 2011 Oct;165(4):815-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10474.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
10
Diagnostic Value and Practicability of Serration Pattern Analysis by Direct Immunofluorescence Microscopy in Pemphigoid Diseases.直接免疫荧光显微镜下锯齿状模式分析在类天疱疮疾病中的诊断价值及实用性
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Mar 9;101(3):adv00410. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3748.

引用本文的文献

1
State-of-the-art diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases.自身免疫性水疱病的最新诊断方法。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 6;15:1363032. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1363032. eCollection 2024.
2
Diagnostic Techniques in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases.自身免疫性疱病的诊断技术。
Br J Biomed Sci. 2023 Nov 24;80:11809. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2023.11809. eCollection 2023.
3
[Rare variants of pemphigoid diseases].[类天疱疮疾病的罕见变体]
Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;74(12):937-947. doi: 10.1007/s00105-023-05242-2. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita-Current and Emerging Treatments.获得性大疱性表皮松解症——当前及新出现的治疗方法
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 1;12(3):1139. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031139.
5
Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam.越南自身免疫性大疱性皮肤病患者临床、组织学及直接免疫荧光检查结果的一致性
Dermatopathology (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;10(1):30-40. doi: 10.3390/dermatopathology10010004.
6
Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Presentations, Diagnosis, and Patients' Assessment.改善大疱性类天疱疮预后的策略:临床表现、诊断及患者评估的全面综述
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Apr 14;15:661-673. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S267573. eCollection 2022.
7
Bullous Autoimmune Dermatoses–Clinical Features, Diagnostic Evaluation, and Treatment Options.大疱性自身免疫性皮肤病——临床特征、诊断评估和治疗选择。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Jun 18;118(24):413-420. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0136.
8
European guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part I.欧洲皮肤病学会和性病学会发起的黏膜类天疱疮诊断和治疗欧洲指南(S3)- 第一部分。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Sep;35(9):1750-1764. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17397. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
9
Diagnosis of Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita: Multicentre Comparison of Different Assays for Serum Anti-type VII Collagen Reactivity.获得性大疱性表皮松解症的诊断:血清抗VII型胶原蛋白反应性不同检测方法的多中心比较
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Mar 23;101(3):adv00420. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3774.
10
Milestones in Personalized Medicine in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid.天疱疮和类天疱疮的个体化医学里程碑。
Front Immunol. 2021 Jan 11;11:591971. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.591971. eCollection 2020.