Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg S-412 96, Sweden.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
New trends in research on traffic accidents include Naturalistic Driving Studies (NDS). NDS are based on large scale data collection of driver, vehicle, and environment information in real world. NDS data sets have proven to be extremely valuable for the analysis of safety critical events such as crashes and near crashes. However, finding safety critical events in NDS data is often difficult and time consuming. Safety critical events are currently identified using kinematic triggers, for instance searching for deceleration below a certain threshold signifying harsh braking. Due to the low sensitivity and specificity of this filtering procedure, manual review of video data is currently necessary to decide whether the events identified by the triggers are actually safety critical. Such reviewing procedure is based on subjective decisions, is expensive and time consuming, and often tedious for the analysts. Furthermore, since NDS data is exponentially growing over time, this reviewing procedure may not be viable anymore in the very near future. This study tested the hypothesis that automatic processing of driver video information could increase the correct classification of safety critical events from kinematic triggers in naturalistic driving data. Review of about 400 video sequences recorded from the events, collected by 100 Volvo cars in the euroFOT project, suggested that drivers' individual reaction may be the key to recognize safety critical events. In fact, whether an event is safety critical or not often depends on the individual driver. A few algorithms, able to automatically classify driver reaction from video data, have been compared. The results presented in this paper show that the state of the art subjective review procedures to identify safety critical events from NDS can benefit from automated objective video processing. In addition, this paper discusses the major challenges in making such video analysis viable for future NDS and new potential applications for NDS video processing. As new NDS such as SHRP2 are now providing the equivalent of five years of one vehicle data each day, the development of new methods, such as the one proposed in this paper, seems necessary to guarantee that these data can actually be analysed.
交通事故研究的新趋势包括自然驾驶研究(NDS)。NDS 基于在现实世界中对驾驶员、车辆和环境信息的大规模数据收集。NDS 数据集已被证明对于分析安全关键事件(如碰撞和接近碰撞)非常有价值。然而,在 NDS 数据中找到安全关键事件通常是困难且耗时的。目前,使用运动触发来识别安全关键事件,例如搜索低于一定阈值的减速,表示急刹车。由于此过滤过程的灵敏度和特异性较低,因此目前需要手动审查视频数据,以确定触发识别的事件是否确实是安全关键事件。这种审查程序基于主观决策,既昂贵又耗时,并且对分析人员来说通常很乏味。此外,由于 NDS 数据随时间呈指数增长,因此在不久的将来,此审查过程可能不再可行。本研究测试了以下假设:即自动处理驾驶员视频信息可以提高从自然驾驶数据中的运动触发正确分类安全关键事件的能力。对大约 400 个视频序列进行了审查,这些序列是由 100 辆沃尔沃汽车在 euroFOT 项目中记录的事件中收集的,研究表明驾驶员的个体反应可能是识别安全关键事件的关键。实际上,事件是否安全关键通常取决于驾驶员个体。已经比较了几种能够从视频数据中自动分类驾驶员反应的算法。本文提出的结果表明,从 NDS 中识别安全关键事件的最新主观审查程序可以受益于自动化客观视频处理。此外,本文讨论了使此类视频分析在未来的 NDS 中可行的主要挑战,以及 NDS 视频处理的新潜在应用。由于新的 NDS (如 SHRP2)每天提供相当于一辆车五年的数据,因此需要开发新的方法,如本文中提出的方法,以确保可以实际分析这些数据。