Milner M R, Gelman K M, Phillips R A, Fuster V, Davies T F, Goldman M E
Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Pharmacotherapy. 1990;10(2):100-6.
We compared the efficacy of diltiazem and propranolol in a randomized, prospective, double-blind, crossover study in six patients with untreated thyrotoxicosis (mean age 31 yrs). The patients received either diltiazem 60 mg orally four times a day or propranolol 40 mg orally four times a day, each for 1 week, separated by a 3-day drug-free period. Blood pressure, heart rate, thyroid hormone levels (free T4, T3), electrocardiogram, two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiograms, and Doppler studies were performed. In addition, 8 clinical signs and 18 symptoms of thyrotoxicosis were graded. All subjects felt better with drug therapy, with three preferring diltiazem to propranolol. No significant difference in clinical response or in hemodynamic effects was noted between the agents. These data suggest that diltiazem may serve as an alternative therapy for beta blockers in controlling thyrotoxic symptoms in patients in whom beta blockade may be contraindicated.
我们在一项随机、前瞻性、双盲、交叉研究中,比较了地尔硫䓬和普萘洛尔对6例未经治疗的甲状腺毒症患者(平均年龄31岁)的疗效。患者分别接受每日4次口服60毫克地尔硫䓬或每日4次口服40毫克普萘洛尔治疗,各治疗1周,中间有3天的停药期。进行了血压、心率、甲状腺激素水平(游离T4、T3)、心电图、二维和M型超声心动图以及多普勒研究。此外,对甲状腺毒症的8项临床体征和18项症状进行了分级。所有受试者药物治疗后感觉均有改善,3人更喜欢地尔硫䓬而非普萘洛尔。两种药物在临床反应或血流动力学效应方面无显著差异。这些数据表明,在β受体阻滞剂可能禁忌的患者中,地尔硫䓬可作为β受体阻滞剂的替代疗法来控制甲状腺毒症症状。