Weiss R J, Bent B
J Clin Hypertens. 1987 Jun;3(2):135-43.
The antihypertensive efficacy of timed-release diltiazem was compared with propranolol in a randomized, double-blind study of 40 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients (diltiazem = 17; propranolol = 9) had echocardiograms at baseline and after 6 months of therapy to determine left ventricular mass, end-systolic stress, total peripheral resistance, and cross-sectional area index. Diltiazem lowered the blood pressure (152/98 to 134/83), as propranolol did (155/98 to 150/85). Diltiazem caused a significant reduction in left ventricular mass (215.1 +/- 56.3 to 175.7 +/- 54.7 g; p less than 0.0007) and in cross-sectional area index (5.7 +/- 1.0 to 4.8 +/- 1.1 cm2; p less than 0.002). Propranolol caused no change in mass (227.5 +/- 45.6 to 227.4 +/- 54.0) and no change in cross-sectional area index (5.3 +/- 0.8 to 5.5 +/- 1.2). Comparisons between diltiazem and propranolol showed a significantly greater decrease in mass with diltiazem (p less than 0.03) and cross-sectional index (p less than 0.015). Diltiazem proved to be safe and equally efficacious in blood pressure control and significantly better in reducing indices of mass hypertrophy than propranolol.
在一项针对40例轻度至中度高血压患者的随机双盲研究中,对缓释地尔硫卓与普萘洛尔的降压疗效进行了比较。患者(地尔硫卓组 = 17例;普萘洛尔组 = 9例)在基线时及治疗6个月后进行了超声心动图检查,以测定左心室质量、收缩末期应力、总外周阻力和横截面积指数。地尔硫卓降低了血压(从152/98降至134/83),普萘洛尔也降低了血压(从155/98降至150/85)。地尔硫卓使左心室质量显著降低(从215.1±56.3克降至175.7±54.7克;p<0.0007),横截面积指数也显著降低(从5.7±1.0平方厘米降至4.8±1.1平方厘米;p<0.002)。普萘洛尔对左心室质量(从227.5±45.6克降至227.4±54.0克)和横截面积指数(从5.3±0.8平方厘米降至5.5±1.2平方厘米)均无影响。地尔硫卓与普萘洛尔的比较显示,地尔硫卓使左心室质量下降幅度更大(p<0.03),横截面积指数下降幅度也更大(p<0.015)。结果证明,地尔硫卓在控制血压方面安全且疗效相当,在降低质量肥大指数方面明显优于普萘洛尔。