• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Predicting test of memory malingering and medical symptom validity test failure within a Veterans Affairs Medical Center: use of the Response Bias Scale and the Henry-Heilbronner Index.

作者信息

Whitney Kriscinda A

机构信息

Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 May;28(3):222-35. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act012. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/act012
PMID:23493404
Abstract

The ability of the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and the Henry-Heilbronner Index (HHI), along with several other MMPI-2 validity scales, to predict performance on two separate stand-alone symptom validity tests, the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT), was examined. Findings from this retrospective data analysis of outpatients seen within a Veterans Affairs medical center (N = 194) showed that group differences between those passing and failing the TOMM were largest for the RBS (d = 0.79), HHI (d = 0.75), and Infrequency (F; d = 0.72). The largest group differences for those passing versus failing the MSVT were greatest on the HHI (d = 0.83), RBS (d = 0.80), and F (d = 0.78). Regression analyses showed that the RBS accounted for the most variance in TOMM scores (20%), whereas the HHI accounted for the most variance in MSVT scores (26%). Nonetheless, due to unacceptably low positive and negative predictive values, caution is warranted in using either one of these indices in isolation to predict performance invalidity.

摘要

相似文献

1
Predicting test of memory malingering and medical symptom validity test failure within a Veterans Affairs Medical Center: use of the Response Bias Scale and the Henry-Heilbronner Index.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 May;28(3):222-35. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act012. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
2
Utility of the response bias scale (RBS) and other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting TOMM performance.反应偏差量表(RBS)及其他明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)效度量表在预测本顿视觉保持测验(TOMM)表现方面的效用。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(7-8):777-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
3
Validation of the MMPI-2 Response Bias Scale and Henry-Heilbronner Index in a U.S. veteran population.验证 MMPI-2 反应偏差量表和亨利-海尔布伦纳指数在美国退伍军人人群中的应用。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;26(3):194-204. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr015. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
4
WAIS-IV Digit Span variables: are they valuable for use in predicting TOMM and MSVT failure?韦氏成人智力量表第四版数字广度变量:它们在预测雷伊听觉词语学习测验和明尼苏达失语症甄别测验失败方面有价值吗?
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2013;20(2):83-94. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2012.670167. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
5
Comparison between the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT) in adults with disability claims.残疾索赔成年人群中记忆伪装测验(TOMM)与非言语医学症状效度测验(NV-MSVT)的比较。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2011 Jan;18(1):18-26. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2010.523365.
6
Comparison of MMPI-2 validity scale scores of personal injury litigants and disability claimants.人身伤害诉讼者和残疾索赔者的 MMPI-2 效度量表评分比较。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;25(8):1403-14. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.613854. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
7
Combining the test of memory malingering trial 1 with behavioral responses improves the detection of effort test failure.将记忆伪装测试试验1的测试与行为反应相结合,可提高对努力测试失败的检测能力。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2014;21(4):269-77. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2013.811076. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
8
Derivation and clinical validation of consistency indices on the test of memory malingering.记忆伪装测验中一致性指数的推导和临床验证。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Nov;27(7):706-15. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs078. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
9
A known-groups evaluation of the response bias scale in a neuropsychological setting.在神经心理学环境中对反应偏差量表进行已知群组评估。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2013;20(1):20-32. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2012.670149. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
10
Sensitivity of the test of memory malingering and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test: a replication study.记忆伪装测试与非言语医学症状效度测试的敏感性:一项重复研究。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;18(4):284-90. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2011.595455.