Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, TN, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;26(3):194-204. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr015. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
The Response Bias Scale (RBS) and the Henry-Heilbronner Index (HHI) are two recently developed Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) validity scales empirically derived for the purpose of detecting feigned symptom report. Utilizing a veteran sample, the present study examined the utility of these and other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting Word Memory Test (WMT) failure and presence of recent, current, or upcoming compensation evaluation. Although a significant predictor of WMT performance, RBS did not show incremental validity over Infrequency scale of the MMPI-2 in prediction of WMT failure and was not significantly associated with membership in the "Compensation-Context" (CC) group. In contrast, HHI best predicted CC group membership, but only trended toward significance in predicting WMT failure. In predicting CC group membership, HHI showed incremental validity above the established MMPI-2 validity scales, but its specificity was low. In the context of current literature on RBS and HHI, results support continued use of RBS and HHI but suggest that these scales may perform differently in samples other than the compensation-seeking samples on which they were developed.
反应偏差量表(RBS)和亨利-海尔布伦纳指数(HHI)是两种最近开发的明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)效度量表,旨在检测伪装的症状报告。本研究利用退伍军人样本,考察了这些和其他 MMPI-2 效度量表在预测单词记忆测验(WMT)失败和近期、当前或即将进行的赔偿评估中的效用。尽管 RBS 是 WMT 表现的显著预测因素,但在预测 WMT 失败和与“赔偿环境”(CC)组的成员身份方面,RBS 并未显示出比 MMPI-2 的不频繁量表更高的增量有效性,也与 CC 组的成员身份没有显著关联。相比之下,HHI 最能预测 CC 组的成员身份,但在预测 WMT 失败方面仅呈趋势显著。在预测 CC 组的成员身份时,HHI 在预测 WMT 失败方面表现出比既定的 MMPI-2 效度量表更高的增量有效性,但特异性较低。在 RBS 和 HHI 的当前文献背景下,研究结果支持继续使用 RBS 和 HHI,但表明这些量表在开发它们的赔偿寻求样本之外的其他样本中可能表现不同。