Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Neurol. 2013 May;73(5):584-93. doi: 10.1002/ana.23845. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are a neuroimaging marker of small vessel disease (SVD) with relevance for understanding disease mechanisms in cerebrovascular disease, cognitive impairment, and normal aging. It is hypothesized that lobar CMBs are due to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and deep CMBs are due to subcortical ischemic SVD. We tested this hypothesis using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers of subcortical SVD and in vivo imaging of amyloid in patients with cognitive impairment.
We included 226 patients: 89 with Alzheimer disease-related cognitive impairment (ADCI) and 137 with subcortical vascular cognitive impairment (SVCI). All subjects underwent amyloid imaging with [(11) C] Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography, and MRI to detect CMBs and markers of subcortical SVD, including the volume of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and the number of lacunes.
Parietal and occipital lobar CMBs counts were higher in PiB(+) ADCI with moderate WMH than PiB(+) ADCI with minimal WMH, whereas PiB(-) patients with SVCI (ie, "pure" SVCI) showed both lobar and deep CMBs. In multivariate analyses of the whole cohort, WMH volume and lacuna counts were positively associated with both lobar and deep CMBs, whereas amyloid burden (PiB) was only associated with lobar CMBs. There was an interaction between lacuna burden and PiB retention on lobar (but not deep) CMBs (p<0.001).
Our findings suggest that although deep CMBs are mainly linked to subcortical SVD, both subcortical SVD and amyloid-related pathologies (eg, CAA) contribute to the pathogenesis of lobar CMBs, at least in subjects with mixed lobar and deep CMBs. Furthermore, subcortical SVD and amyloid-related pathologies interact to increase the risk of lobar CMBs.
脑微出血(CMBs)是小血管疾病(SVD)的神经影像学标志物,对理解脑血管疾病、认知障碍和正常衰老中的疾病机制具有重要意义。人们假设,脑叶 CMBs 是由于脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)引起的,而深部 CMBs 是由于皮质下缺血性 SVD 引起的。我们使用皮质下 SVD 的结构磁共振成像(MRI)标志物和认知障碍患者的淀粉样蛋白体内成像来测试这一假设。
我们纳入了 226 名患者:89 名患有与阿尔茨海默病相关的认知障碍(ADCI),137 名患有皮质下血管性认知障碍(SVCI)。所有患者均接受了 [(11)C]匹兹堡复合物 B(PiB)正电子发射断层扫描和 MRI 以检测 CMBs 和皮质下 SVD 的标志物,包括脑白质高信号(WMH)体积和腔隙数量。
与 WMH 最小的 PiB(+)ADCI 相比,WMH 中度的 PiB(+)ADCI 患者的顶叶和枕叶脑叶 CMBs 计数更高,而 SVCI(即“纯”SVCI)的 PiB(-)患者则显示出脑叶和深部 CMBs。在整个队列的多变量分析中,WMH 体积和腔隙计数与脑叶和深部 CMBs 均呈正相关,而淀粉样蛋白负荷(PiB)仅与脑叶 CMBs 相关。腔隙负荷和 PiB 保留之间存在脑叶 CMBs 的相互作用(但不是深部 CMBs)(p<0.001)。
我们的研究结果表明,尽管深部 CMBs 主要与皮质下 SVD 相关,但皮质下 SVD 和淀粉样蛋白相关病理学(如 CAA)至少在混合脑叶和深部 CMBs 的患者中,均有助于脑叶 CMBs 的发病机制。此外,皮质下 SVD 和淀粉样蛋白相关病理学相互作用会增加脑叶 CMBs 的风险。