Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, USA.
Ethn Dis. 2013 Winter;23(1):6-11.
A serious challenge to eliminating US health disparities stems from the inability to reliably measure outcomes, particularly for numerically small populations. Our study aimed to produce reliable estimates of health care quality among Native Hawaiian (NH), Other Pacific Islander (PI), and Asian American (AA) subgroups.
Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality were used to calculate 3 PQI composites and 8 individual chronic condition indicators. Data sources were the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases and the Hawaii Health Survey.
Risk-adjusted PQI rates for adults were computed for 2005 through 2007. Relative rates for 2007 were calculated for each racial/ethnic group and compared to Whites. Statistical significance was based on P < .05 from a two-sided t test.
The combined AANHPI group had higher overall and chronic PQI composite rates than Whites in 2007. When disaggregated into discrete racial/ethnic subgroups, Chinese and Japanese had lower rates than Whites for all 3 composites, whereas NH and Other PI subgroups typically had the worst health outcomes. Trends in PQI rates from 2005 through 2007 showed persistent gaps between groups, especially across chronic PQIs.
Despite recent efforts to reduce racial/ethnic health care disparities, significant gaps remain in potentially preventable hospitalization rates. Practical tools that measure inequities across diverse, numerically small populations may suggest ways to optimally funnel limited resources toward improving racial/ethnic differences in health outcomes.
消除美国健康差异的一个严重挑战源于无法可靠地衡量结果,尤其是对于数量较少的人群。我们的研究旨在为夏威夷原住民 (NH)、其他太平洋岛民 (PI) 和亚裔美国人 (AA) 亚群提供可靠的医疗质量估计。
使用医疗保健研究和质量机构的预防质量指标 (PQI) 来计算 3 个 PQI 综合指标和 8 个个体慢性病指标。数据来源是医疗保健成本和利用项目州住院数据库和夏威夷健康调查。
计算了 2005 年至 2007 年成年人的风险调整 PQI 率。为每个种族/族裔群体计算了 2007 年的相对比率,并与白人进行了比较。统计学意义基于双侧 t 检验的 P <.05。
在 2007 年,AANHPI 组合的整体和慢性 PQI 综合率均高于白人。当细分为离散的种族/族裔亚组时,与白人相比,中国和日本的所有 3 个综合指标的率都较低,而 NH 和其他 PI 亚组的健康结果通常最差。2005 年至 2007 年 PQI 率的趋势表明,各群体之间仍然存在持续的差距,尤其是在慢性 PQI 方面。
尽管最近努力减少种族/族裔医疗保健差异,但在可预防住院率方面仍存在显著差距。衡量不同、数量较少的人群之间不平等的实用工具可能会为如何优化将有限资源用于改善种族/族裔健康结果的差异提供建议。