Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Nov 1;64(11):1095-102. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200408.
OBJECTIVE The study objective was to fill research gaps about inpatient psychiatric service utilization among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AA/PIs). METHODS Rates of psychiatric hospitalization, illness severity, and length of stay were compared among AA/PI adults overall and across diagnoses (schizophrenia, depression, bipolar, anxiety, and other psychiatric disorders identified by All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups) by using discharge data from all hospitalizations in Hawaii from December 2006 to 2010. Multivariable models adjusted for gender, age, payer, and residence. RESULTS In multivariable analyses of total psychiatric hospitalizations, Chinese (rate ratio [RR]=.22), Japanese (RR=.23), Filipinos (RR=.30), and Native Hawaiians (RR=.37) had significantly lower rates than whites. Native Hawaiians had significantly higher hospitalization rates compared with other AA/PI groups. Length of stay was significantly longer for Chinese (length of stay ratio [LOSR]=1.53), Filipinos (LOSR=1.20), and Japanese (LOSR=1.19) compared with whites, whereas severity of illness was significantly higher for Japanese (odds ratio [OR]=1.36) and Filipinos (OR=1.30). Within specific diagnoses, Native Hawaiians had higher hospitalization rates than other AA/PI groups for depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Chinese, Japanese, and Filipinos had significantly higher illness severity or longer stays than whites for at least one diagnostic category. CONCLUSIONS AA/PI subgroups had lower psychiatric hospitalization rates than whites, but rates varied across AA/PI subgroups. Native Hawaiians had higher hospitalization rates for many diagnoses. Chinese, Japanese, and Filipinos had greater illness severity or longer stays than whites overall and for some diagnoses, whereas Native Hawaiians did not. Disaggregating AA/PI groups provides important insight into mental health services utilization and need.
填补有关亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民(AA/PIs)住院精神科服务利用的研究空白。
利用 2006 年 12 月至 2010 年夏威夷所有住院患者的数据,比较 AA/PI 成年人总体和按诊断(精神分裂症、抑郁症、双相情感障碍、焦虑症和其他经全患者精细诊断相关组确定的精神障碍)划分的精神病住院率、疾病严重程度和住院时间。多变量模型调整了性别、年龄、支付者和居住地。
在总精神病住院的多变量分析中,中国人(比率比 [RR]=.22)、日本人(RR=.23)、菲律宾人(RR=.30)和夏威夷原住民(RR=.37)的住院率明显低于白人。与其他 AA/PI 群体相比,夏威夷原住民的住院率明显更高。与白人相比,中国人(住院时间比 [LOSR]=1.53)、菲律宾人(LOSR=1.20)和日本人(LOSR=1.19)的住院时间明显更长,而日本人(比值比 [OR]=1.36)和菲律宾人(OR=1.30)的疾病严重程度明显更高。在特定诊断中,与其他 AA/PI 群体相比,夏威夷原住民的抑郁症、双相情感障碍和焦虑障碍住院率更高。在许多诊断中,中国人、日本人、菲律宾人比白人的住院率更高,疾病严重程度或住院时间更长。
AA/PI 亚组的精神病住院率低于白人,但亚组之间存在差异。许多诊断的住院率较高的是夏威夷原住民。总体而言,中国人、日本人、菲律宾人比白人的疾病严重程度或住院时间更长,而夏威夷原住民则没有。分解 AA/PI 群体为了解精神卫生服务的利用和需求提供了重要的见解。