Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Valkenberg Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, 7935, South Africa.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013 Mar 11;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-13-17.
This paper outlines stakeholder views on environmental barriers that prevent people who live with psychosocial disability from participating in mental health policy development in South Africa.
Fifty-six semi-structured interviews with national, provincial and local South African mental health stakeholders were conducted between August 2006 and August 2009. Respondents included public sector policy makers, professional regulatory council representatives, and representatives from non-profit organisations (NPOs), disabled people's organisations (DPOs), mental health interest groups, religious organisations, professional associations, universities and research institutions.
Respondents identified three main environmental barriers to participation in policy development: (a) stigmatization and low priority of mental health, (b) poverty, and (c) ineffective recovery and community supports.
A number of attitudes, practices and structures undermine the equal participation of South Africans with psychosocial disability in society. A human rights paradigm and multi-system approach is required to enable full social engagement by people with psychosocial disability, including their involvement in policy development.
本文概述了利益相关者对环境障碍的看法,这些障碍阻止了生活在心理社会残疾中的人参与南非的精神卫生政策制定。
2006 年 8 月至 2009 年 8 月期间,对南非国家、省和地方的 56 名精神卫生利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。受访者包括公共部门政策制定者、专业监管委员会代表,以及非营利组织(NPO)、残疾人组织(DPO)、精神健康利益团体、宗教组织、专业协会、大学和研究机构的代表。
受访者确定了参与政策制定的三个主要环境障碍:(a)精神卫生的污名化和低优先级,(b)贫困,以及(c)无效的康复和社区支持。
许多态度、实践和结构破坏了南非心理社会残疾人士在社会中的平等参与。需要采取人权范式和多系统方法,使心理社会残疾人士能够充分参与社会,包括参与政策制定。