Suppr超能文献

南非精神障碍患者参与精神卫生政策制定的障碍:政策制定者、专业人员、宗教领袖和学者观点的定性研究。

Barriers to the participation of people with psychosocial disability in mental health policy development in South Africa: a qualitative study of perspectives of policy makers, professionals, religious leaders and academics.

机构信息

Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Valkenberg Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, 7935, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013 Mar 11;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-13-17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper outlines stakeholder views on environmental barriers that prevent people who live with psychosocial disability from participating in mental health policy development in South Africa.

METHOD

Fifty-six semi-structured interviews with national, provincial and local South African mental health stakeholders were conducted between August 2006 and August 2009. Respondents included public sector policy makers, professional regulatory council representatives, and representatives from non-profit organisations (NPOs), disabled people's organisations (DPOs), mental health interest groups, religious organisations, professional associations, universities and research institutions.

RESULTS

Respondents identified three main environmental barriers to participation in policy development: (a) stigmatization and low priority of mental health, (b) poverty, and (c) ineffective recovery and community supports.

CONCLUSION

A number of attitudes, practices and structures undermine the equal participation of South Africans with psychosocial disability in society. A human rights paradigm and multi-system approach is required to enable full social engagement by people with psychosocial disability, including their involvement in policy development.

摘要

背景

本文概述了利益相关者对环境障碍的看法,这些障碍阻止了生活在心理社会残疾中的人参与南非的精神卫生政策制定。

方法

2006 年 8 月至 2009 年 8 月期间,对南非国家、省和地方的 56 名精神卫生利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。受访者包括公共部门政策制定者、专业监管委员会代表,以及非营利组织(NPO)、残疾人组织(DPO)、精神健康利益团体、宗教组织、专业协会、大学和研究机构的代表。

结果

受访者确定了参与政策制定的三个主要环境障碍:(a)精神卫生的污名化和低优先级,(b)贫困,以及(c)无效的康复和社区支持。

结论

许多态度、实践和结构破坏了南非心理社会残疾人士在社会中的平等参与。需要采取人权范式和多系统方法,使心理社会残疾人士能够充分参与社会,包括参与政策制定。

相似文献

2
Mental health care user participation in mental health policy development and implementation in South Africa.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(6):568-77. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2010.536153.
6
Services for people with communication disability in Fiji: barriers and drivers of change.
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):2863. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
8
Knowledge and attitudes towards disability in Moldova: A qualitative study of young people's views.
Disabil Health J. 2017 Oct;10(4):632-635. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A conceptual framework for self-advocacy by people with intellectual disabilities.
Afr J Disabil. 2025 May 29;14:1594. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1594. eCollection 2025.
5
Do we react differently toward bionic devices vs. cochlear implants and wheelchairs? Possible links with personality traits.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jul 11;4:1159663. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1159663. eCollection 2023.
8
Factors associated with public attitudes towards persons with disabilities: a systematic review.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11139-3.
9
Adaptation of the WHO group interpersonal therapy for people living with HIV/AIDS in Northwest Ethiopia: A qualitative study.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0238321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238321. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental health services in South Africa: taking stock.
Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2012 Nov;15(6):402-5. doi: 10.4314/ajpsy.v15i6.48.
3
Understanding consumer participation in mental health: Issues of power and change.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2011 Jun;20(3):155-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00719.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
4
'Mental health is everybody's business': roles for an intersectoral approach in South Africa.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(6):611-23. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2010.535510.
5
Mental health care user participation in mental health policy development and implementation in South Africa.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(6):568-77. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2010.536153.
6
Increasing the priority of mental health in Africa: findings from qualitative research in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia.
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Sep;26(5):357-65. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq078. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
8
Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world.
Health Expect. 2009 Sep;12(3):275-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00564.x.
9
Shared decision making is an ethical imperative.
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Aug;60(8):1007. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.8.1007.
10
Mental health policy in South Africa: development process and content.
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Sep;24(5):342-56. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp027. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验