• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智障人士自我维权的概念框架。

A conceptual framework for self-advocacy by people with intellectual disabilities.

作者信息

Tyabashe-Phume Babalwa P, Kleintjes Sharon R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Afr J Disabil. 2025 May 29;14:1594. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1594. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1594
PMID:40469560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12135102/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with intellectual disabilities are generally not consulted in the development of public policies, which impact their lives, and little is known about how to best empower people with intellectual disabilities to enable them to participate in public policy processes.

OBJECTIVES

Our article reports on developing a conceptual framework to support self-advocacy by people with intellectual disabilities in social and health-related policy development in South Africa.

METHOD

Our qualitative study was conducted using empowerment theory and integrated the concept of Ubuntu as a guide and was underpinned by a phenomenological approach. Data were collected through a scoping review, semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review protocol. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were analysed using framework analysis. Data sources were triangulated to develop the conceptual framework, using a process adapted from three approaches used to develop similar conceptual frameworks.

RESULTS

Data triangulation identified three core elements for self-advocacy: (1) personal development; (2) creating a supportive environment to facilitate the empowerment of people with intellectual disability; and (3) improved policy participation opportunities.

CONCLUSION

Participation of people with intellectual disabilities in public policy decisions, which can improve their quality of life, can be supported by developing their capacity for participation and increasing policymakers' understanding as well as facilitation of what is needed to support their participation.

CONTRIBUTION

Our study offers a framework for a comprehensive approach to supporting people with intellectual disabilities in participating in and influencing public policy processes that impact their lives.

摘要

背景

在制定影响智障人士生活的公共政策时,通常不会征求他们的意见,而且对于如何最好地增强智障人士的权能以使他们能够参与公共政策制定过程,人们了解甚少。

目的

我们的文章报道了在南非制定一个概念框架,以支持智障人士在社会和健康相关政策制定中进行自我倡导。

方法

我们的定性研究采用赋权理论,将乌班图概念作为指导并以现象学方法为基础。数据通过范围综述、半结构化访谈和焦点小组收集。范围综述使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的范围综述方案进行。半结构化访谈和焦点小组使用框架分析进行分析。对数据来源进行三角互证以制定概念框架,采用了一种改编自用于制定类似概念框架的三种方法的过程。

结果

数据三角互证确定了自我倡导的三个核心要素:(1)个人发展;(2)营造支持性环境以促进智障人士的赋权;(3)改善政策参与机会。

结论

通过培养智障人士的参与能力、增进政策制定者的理解以及为支持他们的参与提供便利,可以支持智障人士参与公共政策决策,这有助于提高他们的生活质量。

贡献

我们的研究提供了一个全面的框架,以支持智障人士参与并影响那些影响他们生活的公共政策制定过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/417c/12135102/1e57e20c629f/AJOD-14-1594-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/417c/12135102/1e57e20c629f/AJOD-14-1594-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/417c/12135102/1e57e20c629f/AJOD-14-1594-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A conceptual framework for self-advocacy by people with intellectual disabilities.智障人士自我维权的概念框架。
Afr J Disabil. 2025 May 29;14:1594. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1594. eCollection 2025.
2
Using a Capability Approach to Explore How People With Intellectual Disabilities Can Lead Flourishing Lives.运用能力方法探究智力残疾人如何过上幸福生活。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 Nov;37(6):e13299. doi: 10.1111/jar.13299.
3
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
4
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
5
The All Together Group: Co-Designing a Toolkit of Approaches and Resources for End-of-Life Care Planning With People With Intellectual Disabilities in Social Care Settings.全体协作小组:与社会护理环境中的智障人士共同设计一套临终关怀规划方法与资源工具包。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14174. doi: 10.1111/hex.14174.
6
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.改善对有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭照顾者的支持与提前规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644.
7
Physical-activity support for people with intellectual disabilities: a theory-informed qualitative study exploring the direct support professionals' perspective.身体活动支持智障人士:一项理论导向的定性研究,探索直接支持专业人员的观点。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Dec;42(25):3614-3620. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1602851. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
8
Sexual Health Literacy Among Adults With Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review.成年智障者的性健康素养:一项范围综述
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 May;69(5):345-369. doi: 10.1111/jir.13217. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
9
Exploring technology use among older adults with intellectual disabilities: barriers, opportunities, and the role of advanced technologies.探索智障老年人的技术使用情况:障碍、机遇及先进技术的作用。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Apr 28:1-12. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2498566.
10
What are we planning, exactly? The perspectives of people with intellectual disabilities, their carers and professionals on end-of-life care planning: A focus group study.我们具体计划做什么?智障人士、他们的照顾者和专业人士对临终关怀规划的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Palliat Med. 2024 Jun;38(6):669-678. doi: 10.1177/02692163241250218.

本文引用的文献

1
A call to give a voice to people with intellectual disabilities in Africa through inclusive research.呼吁通过包容性研究,让非洲智障人士发出自己的声音。
Afr J Disabil. 2023 Apr 25;12:1127. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1127. eCollection 2023.
2
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
3
Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us?南非的智障者权利与包容性公民身份:范围综述能告诉我们什么?
Afr J Disabil. 2018 Apr 25;7:396. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v7i0.396. eCollection 2018.
4
'We Were More Radical back then': Victoria's First Self-Advocacy Organisation for People with Intellectual Disability.“那时我们更激进”:维多利亚州首个智障人士自我倡导组织
Health History. 2016;18(1):42-66. doi: 10.5401/healthhist.18.1.0042.
5
Self-Advocacy as a Means to Positive Identities for People with Intellectual Disability: 'We Just Help Them, Be Them Really'.自我倡导作为智障人士获得积极身份认同的一种方式:“我们只是帮助他们,让他们做自己”。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017 Jan;30(1):109-120. doi: 10.1111/jar.12223. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
6
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
7
Barriers to the participation of people with psychosocial disability in mental health policy development in South Africa: a qualitative study of perspectives of policy makers, professionals, religious leaders and academics.南非精神障碍患者参与精神卫生政策制定的障碍:政策制定者、专业人员、宗教领袖和学者观点的定性研究。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013 Mar 11;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-13-17.
8
Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.超越 PICO:用于定性证据综合的 SPIDER 工具。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43. doi: 10.1177/1049732312452938. Epub 2012 Jul 24.