• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Service user and family participation in mental health policy making in Timor-Leste: a qualitative study with multiple stakeholders.服务使用者和家属参与东帝汶精神卫生政策制定:多利益攸关方的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02521-3.
2
Are people-centred mental health services acceptable and feasible in Timor-Leste? A qualitative study.以人为中心的精神卫生服务在东帝汶是否可行和可接受?一项定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Nov 1;34(Supplement_2):ii93-ii103. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz108.
3
Social inclusion and exclusion of people with mental illness in Timor-Leste: a qualitative investigation with multiple stakeholders.东帝汶精神疾病患者的社会包容与排斥:多利益攸关方的定性调查。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7042-4.
4
Intersectoral collaboration for people-centred mental health care in Timor-Leste: a mixed-methods study using qualitative and social network analysis.东帝汶以人民为中心的精神卫生保健跨部门合作:一项采用定性和社会网络分析的混合方法研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Nov 16;13:72. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0328-1. eCollection 2019.
5
The decision to seek care antenatally and during labour and birth - Who and what influences this in Timor-Leste? A qualitative project exploring the perceptions of Timorese women and men.关于在东帝汶产前、分娩期间寻求护理的决定——谁以及什么因素对此产生影响?一项探索东帝汶女性和男性看法的定性研究项目。
Midwifery. 2018 Oct;65:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
6
Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: a cross-country qualitative study.服务使用者和照护者参与中低收入国家精神卫生系统强化:一项跨国定性研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):29-39. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000634. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
"I go I die, I stay I die, better to stay and die in my house": understanding the barriers to accessing health care in Timor-Leste.“我走我死,我留我死,不如留在家里等死”:理解东帝汶获得医疗保健的障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 30;16(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1762-2.
8
Healthcare Responses to Gender-Based Violence in Timor-Leste: Women Want Empathy, Information and Safety From an Integrated Support System.东帝汶的基于性别的暴力的医疗保健对策:妇女希望从综合支持系统中获得同理心、信息和安全。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22175-NP22198. doi: 10.1177/08862605211072156. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
9
What influences a woman's decision to access contraception in Timor-Leste? Perceptions from Timorese women and men.在东帝汶,是什么影响了女性选择使用避孕措施?来自东帝汶男性和女性的看法。
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Dec;20(12):1317-1332. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1433330. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
Key factors deterring women's engagement with skilled birth attendants in three districts of Timor-Leste. A qualitative descriptive study.阻碍东帝汶三个地区妇女与熟练接生员合作的关键因素。一项定性描述性研究。
Midwifery. 2019 Dec;79:102555. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102555. Epub 2019 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Masculine norms and mental health of African men: what can psychology do?非洲男性的男性气质规范与心理健康:心理学能做些什么?
Heliyon. 2020 Dec 10;6(12):e05650. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05650. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Intersectoral collaboration for people-centred mental health care in Timor-Leste: a mixed-methods study using qualitative and social network analysis.东帝汶以人民为中心的精神卫生保健跨部门合作:一项采用定性和社会网络分析的混合方法研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Nov 16;13:72. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0328-1. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Are people-centred mental health services acceptable and feasible in Timor-Leste? A qualitative study.以人为中心的精神卫生服务在东帝汶是否可行和可接受?一项定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Nov 1;34(Supplement_2):ii93-ii103. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz108.
2
Social inclusion and exclusion of people with mental illness in Timor-Leste: a qualitative investigation with multiple stakeholders.东帝汶精神疾病患者的社会包容与排斥:多利益攸关方的定性调查。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7042-4.
3
Beyond positive a priori bias: reframing community engagement in LMICs.超越积极先验偏见:重新构建在 LMICs 中的社区参与。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Jun 1;35(3):598-609. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz023.
4
The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development.柳叶刀全球精神卫生与可持续发展委员会
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1553-1598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Participation in mental healthcare: a qualitative meta-synthesis.参与精神卫生保健:一项定性元综合分析
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Nov 7;11:67. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0174-y. eCollection 2017.
6
Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: a cross-country qualitative study.服务使用者和照护者参与中低收入国家精神卫生系统强化:一项跨国定性研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):29-39. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000634. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
Service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a rural African setting: qualitative study.服务使用者参与非洲农村地区精神卫生系统强化工作的质性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 18;17(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1352-9.
8
Service user and care giver involvement in mental health system strengthening in Nepal: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors.服务使用者和照顾者参与尼泊尔精神卫生系统强化工作:关于障碍与促进因素的定性研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Apr 19;11:30. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0139-1. eCollection 2017.
9
Information, regulation and coordination: realist analysis of the efforts of community health committees to limit informal health care providers in Nigeria.信息、监管与协调:对尼日利亚社区卫生委员会限制非正规医疗服务提供者努力的现实主义分析
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0131-5. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
10
Service user involvement for mental health system strengthening in India: a qualitative study.印度加强精神卫生系统中的服务使用者参与:一项定性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 28;16:269. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0981-8.

服务使用者和家属参与东帝汶精神卫生政策制定:多利益攸关方的定性研究。

Service user and family participation in mental health policy making in Timor-Leste: a qualitative study with multiple stakeholders.

机构信息

Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Exhibition Street, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02521-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-02521-3
PMID:32164633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7069011/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participation in mental health system strengthening by people with mental health problems and their families is a cornerstone of people-centred mental health care, yet there is a dearth of research about participation from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly from the Asia Pacific region. Hence, this study aimed to assess the current situation, challenges, enabling factors and future actions for service user and family participation in mental health policy making in Timor-Leste.

METHODS

In-depth interviews were conducted with 85 adults (≥18 years) who were: (1) mental health service users (n = 20) and their families (n = 10); (2) government decision makers (n = 10); (3) mental health and social service providers (n = 23); (4) civil society (n = 9); and (5) other groups (n = 13). Interview data was analysed using framework analysis.

RESULTS

There was limited service user, family and community participation in mental health policy making in Timor-Leste. Perceptions that policy making is a technical exercise and that people with mental health problems lack cognitive capacity, and a lack of supportive mechanisms challenged participation. Enabling factors were a strong focus on human rights within the social sector, and existing mechanisms for advocacy and representation of people with disabilities in social policy making. Participants suggested bolstering civil society representation of people with mental health problems, and increasing mental health awareness and literacy, including government competencies to facilitate service user participation.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the need for theoretical and practical focus on the role of family within mental health system development in LMICs. Global mental health research and practice should adopt a critical approach to mental health service user and family participation to ensure that the concept and strategies to achieve this are embedded in LMIC knowledge.

摘要

背景

精神健康问题患者及其家属参与精神卫生系统强化是以人为本的精神卫生保健的基石,但来自中低收入国家(LMICs),尤其是亚太地区的关于参与情况的研究却很少。因此,本研究旨在评估东帝汶精神卫生政策制定中服务使用者和家属参与的现状、挑战、有利因素和未来行动。

方法

对 85 名成年人(≥18 岁)进行了深入访谈,包括:(1)精神卫生服务使用者(n=20)及其家属(n=10);(2)政府决策者(n=10);(3)精神卫生和社会服务提供者(n=23);(4)民间社会(n=9);和(5)其他群体(n=13)。使用框架分析对访谈数据进行了分析。

结果

东帝汶的精神卫生政策制定中服务使用者、家属和社区参与有限。人们认为政策制定是一项技术性的工作,而且精神健康问题患者缺乏认知能力,缺乏支持性机制,这些因素都对参与造成了挑战。有利因素包括社会部门对人权的高度重视,以及现有的残疾人社会政策倡导和代表机制。参与者建议加强民间社会对精神健康问题患者的代表性,提高精神卫生意识和素养,包括政府促进服务使用者参与的能力。

结论

研究结果强调需要从理论和实践上关注家庭在精神卫生系统发展中的作用,特别是在中低收入国家。全球精神卫生研究和实践应采取批判性方法来关注精神卫生服务使用者和家属的参与,以确保这一概念和实现这一目标的策略嵌入到中低收入国家的知识体系中。