Suppr超能文献

低分子量肝素或未分级肝素在静脉血栓栓塞症中的应用:肾功能的影响。

Low-molecular-weight or unfractionated heparin in venous thromboembolism: the influence of renal function.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2013 May;126(5):425-434.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.09.021. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute venous thromboembolism and renal insufficiency, initial therapy with unfractionated heparin may have some advantages over low-molecular-weight heparin.

METHODS

We used the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) Registry data to evaluate the 15-day outcome in 38,531 recruited patients. We used propensity score matching to compare patients treated with unfractionated heparin with those treated with low-molecular-weight heparin in 3 groups stratified by creatinine clearance levels at baseline: >60 mL/min, 30 to 60 mL/min, or <30 mL/min.

RESULTS

Patients initially receiving unfractionated heparin therapy (n = 2167) more likely had underlying diseases than those receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (n = 34,665). Propensity score-matched groups of patients with creatinine clearance levels >60 mL/min (n = 1598 matched pairs), 30 to 60 mL/min (n = 277 matched pairs), and <30 mL/min (n = 210 matched pairs) showed an increased 15-day mortality for unfractionated heparin compared with low-molecular-weight heparin (4.5% vs 2.4% [P = .001], 5.4% vs 5.8% [P = not significant], and 15% vs 8.1% [P = .02], respectively), an increased rate of fatal pulmonary embolism (2.8% vs 1.2% [P = .001], 3.2% vs 2.5% [P = not significant], and 5.7% vs 2.4% [P = .02], respectively), and a similar rate of fatal bleeding (0.3% vs 0.3%, 0.7% vs 0.7%, and 0.5% vs 0.0%, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients treated with unfractionated heparin were at increased risk for all-cause death (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.4) and fatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.6).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with low-molecular-weight heparin, initial therapy with unfractionated heparin was associated with a higher mortality and higher rate of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with creatinine clearance levels >60 mL/min or <30 mL/min, but not in those with levels between 30 and 60 mL/min.

摘要

背景

在患有急性静脉血栓栓塞和肾功能不全的患者中,与低分子肝素相比,初始使用普通肝素治疗可能具有一些优势。

方法

我们使用 Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbólica(RIETE)登记处的数据,评估了 38531 名入选患者的 15 天结局。我们使用倾向评分匹配,比较了在基线时肌酐清除率分别为 >60 mL/min、30 至 60 mL/min 和 <30 mL/min 的 3 组患者中,分别接受普通肝素和低分子肝素治疗的患者。

结果

与接受低分子肝素治疗的患者(n=34665)相比,初始接受普通肝素治疗的患者(n=2167)更有可能患有基础疾病。在肌酐清除率 >60 mL/min(n=1598 对匹配对)、30 至 60 mL/min(n=277 对匹配对)和 <30 mL/min(n=210 对匹配对)的匹配组中,与低分子肝素相比,普通肝素治疗的 15 天死亡率更高(4.5%对 2.4%[P=.001],5.4%对 5.8%[P=无显著性差异],15%对 8.1%[P=.02]),致命性肺栓塞发生率更高(2.8%对 1.2%[P=.001],3.2%对 2.5%[P=无显著性差异],5.7%对 2.4%[P=.02]),致命性出血发生率相似(0.3%对 0.3%,0.7%对 0.7%和 0.5%对 0.0%)。多变量分析证实,与接受低分子肝素治疗的患者相比,接受普通肝素治疗的患者全因死亡风险(比值比,1.8;95%置信区间,1.3-2.4)和致命性肺栓塞风险(比值比,2.3;95%置信区间,1.5-3.6)均升高。

结论

与低分子肝素相比,在肌酐清除率 >60 mL/min 或 <30 mL/min 的患者中,初始使用普通肝素治疗与死亡率和致命性肺栓塞发生率升高相关,但在肌酐清除率为 30 至 60 mL/min 的患者中则不然。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验