• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镫骨手术后的骨导:CO2 激光与手动穿孔的比较。

Bone conduction after stapes surgery: comparison of CO2 laser and manual perforation.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Medical School, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jul;34(5):821-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318280dc78.

DOI:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318280dc78
PMID:23503104
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare bone conduction after 2 different ways of perforating the stapes footplate during stapedotomy in patients with otosclerosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

SETTING

Tertiary reference center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study evaluated data from 302 patients (61.2% women) who had undergone primary surgery for stapedial ankylosis between 2000 and 2010. Bone conduction thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz were determined on the first and fourth postoperative days in all patients; 280 patients were followed up after 1 month and 125 after 1 year. Audiograms were compared with preoperative bone conduction.A laser was used to open the stapes footplate in 180 patients; manual perforation was performed in 122.

RESULTS

Immediately postoperatively the bone conduction threshold was significantly worse at almost all frequencies. At lower frequencies (0.5 and 1 kHz), it improved to baseline within the first 4 days. At 2 kHz, the threshold on Day 4 remained significantly worse than baseline and improved only after 1 month, then exceeding the preoperative value. Bone conduction at 4 kHz still tended to be worse than baseline 1 month after surgery, but the difference was no longer statistically significant 1 year later. A direct comparison with classic stapedotomy showed a trend in favor of the laser technique, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Both laser and classic techniques can be used successfully in stapes surgery without causing long-term damage to the inner ear. Direct comparison shows a trend in favor of laser stapedotomy.

摘要

目的

比较耳硬化症患者镫骨底板切开术中两种不同的镫骨底板穿孔方式对骨导听力的影响。

研究设计

回顾性临床研究。

设置

三级参考中心。

材料和方法

本研究评估了 2000 年至 2010 年间因镫骨固定行初次手术的 302 例患者(61.2%为女性)的数据。所有患者均于术后第 1 天和第 4 天测量 0.5、1、2 和 4 kHz 的骨导听阈;280 例患者在术后 1 个月和 125 例患者在术后 1 年进行随访。将听力图与术前骨导听阈进行比较。180 例患者采用激光切开镫骨底板,122 例患者采用手动穿孔。

结果

术后即刻,几乎所有频率的骨导听阈均明显恶化。在低频(0.5 和 1 kHz),术后 4 天内恢复至基线水平。在 2 kHz,术后第 4 天的阈值仍明显低于基线水平,仅在 1 个月后改善,然后超过术前值。术后 1 个月时,4 kHz 的骨导仍较基线差,但差异在术后 1 年时无统计学意义。与经典镫骨切开术的直接比较显示激光技术有一定优势,但差异无统计学意义。

结论

激光和经典技术均可成功应用于镫骨手术,且不会对内耳造成长期损害。直接比较显示激光镫骨切开术有一定优势。

相似文献

1
Bone conduction after stapes surgery: comparison of CO2 laser and manual perforation.镫骨手术后的骨导:CO2 激光与手动穿孔的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jul;34(5):821-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318280dc78.
2
First experience with the fiber-enabled CO2 laser in stapes surgery and a comparison with the "one-shot" technique.纤维激光在镫骨手术中的首次应用及与“单次击发”技术的比较
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Dec;34(9):1581-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000213.
3
Clinical results after stapedotomy: a comparison between the erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and the conventional technique.镫骨切除术的临床结果:铒钇铝石榴石激光与传统技术的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2006 Jun;27(4):458-65. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000217355.96334.ba.
4
Variations in the "Carhart notch" and overclosure after laser-assisted stapedotomy in otosclerosis.耳硬化症激光镫骨足板成形术后“Carhart 切迹”和过闭现象的变化。
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec;30(8):1033-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818edf00.
5
Effect of the stapedotomy technique on early post-operative hearing results--Preliminary results.镫骨切除术技术对术后早期听力结果的影响——初步结果
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012 Aug;39(4):383-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
6
Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database.3050例原发性耳硬化镫骨切除术的手术发现及长期听力结果:一项基于耳科学-神经耳科学数据库的前瞻性研究
Otol Neurotol. 2006 Dec;27(8 Suppl 2):S25-47. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000235311.80066.df.
7
CO2 laser-assisted stapedotomy combined with àWengen titanium clip stapes prosthesis: superior short-term results.CO2 激光辅助镫骨切开术联合 àWengen 钛夹镫骨假体:优越的短期疗效。
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec;30(8):1071-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181a52ab4.
8
KTP versus CO2 laser fiber stapedotomy for primary otosclerosis: results of a new comparative series with the otology-neurotology database.KTP 激光与 CO2 激光纤维鼓膜切开术治疗原发性耳硬化症的比较:一项新的基于耳科学-神经耳科学数据库的系列研究结果。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Aug;33(6):928-33. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825f24ff.
9
Microdrill, CO2-laser, and piezoelectric stapedotomy: a comparative study.微钻、二氧化碳激光和压电鼓膜切开术:比较研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec;30(8):1111-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b76b08.
10
Comparison between 2 laser systems, Er-Yag and CO2, in stapes surgery.铒激光与二氧化碳激光在镫骨手术中的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827853c3.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic stapedotomy: A comparison between the conventional approach versus CO laser-assisted surgery.内镜下镫骨手术:传统方法与二氧化碳激光辅助手术的比较。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 20;9(4):308-313. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.109. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
"Hot" vs "Cold" endoscopic stapes surgery: a matched case-control study.“热”与“冷”内镜镫骨手术:一项配对病例对照研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 May;280(5):2257-2263. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07739-3. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
3
Impact of surgeons' experience and the single-shot perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on outcome in stapedotomy.
外科医生经验和单次围手术期抗生素预防对镫骨切开术结果的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 23;16(2):e0247451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247451. eCollection 2021.
4
Mid-term evaluation of perioperative i.v. corticosteroid treatment efficacy on overall and audiological outcome following CO laser stapedotomy: a retrospective study of 84 cases.CO 激光镫骨切开术围手术期静脉皮质类固醇治疗对总体和听力学结局的中期评估:84 例回顾性研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;277(4):1031-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05816-z. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
5
Is one of these two techniques: CO laser versus microdrill assisted stapedotomy results in better post-operative hearing outcome?这两种技术中的一种:CO 激光与微钻辅助镫骨切开术,哪一种术后听力效果更好?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jul;276(7):1907-1913. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05415-7. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
6
CO laser stapedotomy safety: influence of laser energy and time on bone-conduction hearing levels.CO2激光镫骨切除术的安全性:激光能量和时间对骨导听力水平的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Dec;274(12):4131-4139. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4769-3. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
7
Long-term follow-up after "one-shot" CO laser stapedotomy: is the functional outcome stable during the years?“单次”CO2激光镫骨切除术的长期随访:多年来功能结果是否稳定?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;273(11):3623-3629. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3976-7. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
8
A comparison of hearing results following stapedotomy under local versus general anesthesia.局部麻醉与全身麻醉下镫骨切除术听力结果的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Sep;272(9):2121-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3014-6. Epub 2014 Apr 12.