• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府与企业之间的自愿协议——文献范围综述,特别提及《公共卫生责任协议》。

Voluntary agreements between government and business - a scoping review of the literature with specific reference to the Public Health Responsibility Deal.

机构信息

Policy Research Unit in Policy Innovation Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2013 May;110(2-3):186-97. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.02.009
PMID:23506799
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A scoping review was conducted to synthesise the findings of evaluations of voluntary agreements between business and government. It aimed to summarise the types of agreements that exist, how they work in practice, the conditions for their success and how they had been evaluated.

METHODS

Voluntary agreements were included if they involved a transparent signing-up process and where businesses agreed to carry out specific actions or to achieve specific outcomes. Studies of any design published in English were included.

RESULTS

47 studies were identified. Voluntary agreements may help to improve relationships between government and business, and can help both parties agree on target-setting and data-sharing. Governments may also use the experience to help develop subsequent legislation. For voluntary agreements to be successful, targets should be ambitious and clearly defined, with robust independent monitoring. Public knowledge of agreements can help encourage participation and ensure compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

If properly implemented and monitored, voluntary agreements can be an effective policy approach, though there is little evidence on whether they are more effective than compulsory approaches. Some of the most effective voluntary agreements include substantial disincentives for non-participation and sanctions for non-compliance. Many countries are moving towards these more formal approaches to voluntary agreements.

摘要

目的

本研究通过范围综述,对企业与政府间自愿协议的评估结果进行综合分析。旨在总结现存协议的类型、实际运作方式、成功条件以及评估方法。

方法

纳入研究需满足以下条件:透明的签约流程;企业同意执行具体行动或实现具体成果。纳入所有设计类型的英文发表研究。

结果

共纳入 47 项研究。自愿协议有助于改善政府与企业间的关系,并帮助双方就目标设定和数据共享达成一致。政府也可以利用经验帮助制定后续立法。为了使自愿协议取得成功,目标应该具有野心且明确,并进行严格的独立监测。公众对协议的了解有助于鼓励参与并确保合规。

结论

如果实施和监测得当,自愿协议可能是一种有效的政策方法,但几乎没有证据表明其比强制性方法更有效。一些最有效的自愿协议包括对不参与的实质性惩罚和对不遵守的制裁。许多国家正在朝着更正式的自愿协议方法发展。

相似文献

1
Voluntary agreements between government and business - a scoping review of the literature with specific reference to the Public Health Responsibility Deal.政府与企业之间的自愿协议——文献范围综述,特别提及《公共卫生责任协议》。
Health Policy. 2013 May;110(2-3):186-97. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
2
The Public Health Responsibility Deal: brokering a deal for public health, but on whose terms?《公共卫生责任协议》:为公共卫生促成一项协议,但依据谁的条件?
Health Policy. 2014 Feb;114(2-3):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
3
The effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and policy processes of regulatory, voluntary and partnership policies to improve food environments: an evidence synthesis.监管政策、自愿政策和伙伴关系政策在改善食品环境方面的有效性、成本效益和政策过程:证据综合。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Sep;12(8):1-173. doi: 10.3310/JYWP4049.
4
Food industry body admits that voluntary agreements lack punch.食品行业机构承认自愿协议缺乏效力。
BMJ. 2016 Mar 14;352:i1508. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1508.
5
Comparative institutional analysis for public health: governing voluntary collaborative agreements for public health in England and the Netherlands.比较公共卫生制度分析:英国和荷兰公共卫生自愿合作协议的治理。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Nov 1;28(suppl_3):19-25. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky158.
6
Letter commenting on: Panjwani, C. and Caraher, M. (2014). The Public Health Responsibility Deal: brokering a deal for public health, but on whose terms? Health Policy, 114(2), pp. 163-173.对以下文章的评论信:潘吉瓦尼,C. 和卡拉赫,M.(2014年)。《公共卫生责任协议:促成公共卫生协议,但依据谁的条款?》,《卫生政策》,第114卷,第2期,第163 - 173页。
Health Policy. 2015 Jan;119(1):97. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
7
An evaluation of the Public Health Responsibility Deal: Informants' experiences and views of the development, implementation and achievements of a pledge-based, public-private partnership to improve population health in England.对公共卫生责任协议的评估:举报人对一项基于承诺的公私合作伙伴关系在英格兰改善民众健康方面的发展、实施情况及成果的经验和看法。
Health Policy. 2015 Nov;119(11):1506-14. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
8
Response to Petticrew and colleagues.对佩蒂克鲁及其同事的回应。
Health Policy. 2015 Jan;119(1):98-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
9
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Partnerships With Commercial Actors to Improve Food Environments: A Systematic Review.与商业行为体合作改善食品环境的有效性:一项系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2025 Oct;26(10):e13952. doi: 10.1111/obr.13952. Epub 2025 Jun 29.
2
Portion Size Norms of Discretionary Foods and Eating Settings: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.随意食品份量规范和进食环境:一项重复横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 28;16(21):3670. doi: 10.3390/nu16213670.
3
Inequalities in Research on Food Environment Policies: An Evidence Map of Global Evidence from 2010-2020.
不平等的食品环境政策研究:2010-2020 年全球证据的证据图谱。
Adv Nutr. 2024 Nov;15(11):100306. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100306. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
4
Multisectoral action to address noncommunicable diseases: lessons from three country case studies.多部门行动应对非传染性疾病:来自三个国家案例研究的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 21;12:1303786. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1303786. eCollection 2024.
5
A Proposed Research Agenda for Promoting Healthy Retail Food Environments in the East Asia-Pacific Region.促进东亚太平洋地区健康零售食品环境的研究议程建议。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2021 Dec;10(4):267-281. doi: 10.1007/s13668-021-00381-1. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
6
How food companies use social media to influence policy debates: a framework of Australian ultra-processed food industry Twitter data.食品公司如何利用社交媒体影响政策辩论:来自澳大利亚超加工食品行业 Twitter 数据的框架。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jul;24(10):3124-3135. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020003353. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
7
Drawing on Strategic Management Approaches to Inform Nutrition Policy Design: An Applied Policy Analysis for Salt Reduction in Packaged Foods.借鉴战略管理方法为营养政策设计提供信息:包装食品减盐的应用政策分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):896-908. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.204.
8
Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints.美国牛肉生产中的抗菌政策:在结构和市场限制下选择合适工具以减少抗菌药物使用和耐药性
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jul 19;6:245. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00245. eCollection 2019.
9
Quantifying the impact of the Public Health Responsibility Deal on salt intake, cardiovascular disease and gastric cancer burdens: interrupted time series and microsimulation study.量化公共卫生责任协议对盐摄入量、心血管疾病和胃癌负担的影响:中断时间序列和微观模拟研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Sep;73(9):881-887. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211749. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
10
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.减少含糖饮料消费的环境干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012292.pub2.