Hall Alison M, Poole Lee A L, Renton Bryan, Wozniak Alexa, Fisher Michael, Neal Timothy, Halloran Christopher M, Cox Trevor, Hampshire Peter A
Crit Care. 2013 Mar 18;17(2):R49. doi: 10.1186/cc12569.
Patients with severe acute pancreatitis are at risk of candidal infections carrying the potential risk of an increase in mortality. Since early diagnosis is problematic, several clinical risk scores have been developed to identify patients at risk. Such patients may benefit from prophylactic antifungal therapy while those patients who have a low risk of infection may not benefit and may be harmed. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and discrimination of existing risk scores for invasive candidal infections in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
Patients admitted with severe acute pancreatitis to the intensive care unit were analysed. Outcomes and risk factors of admissions with and without candidal infection were compared. Accuracy and discrimination of three existing risk scores for the development of invasive candidal infection (Candida score, Candida Colonisation Index Score and the Invasive Candidiasis Score) were assessed.
A total of 101 patients were identified from 2003 to 2011 and 18 (17.8%) of these developed candidal infection. Thirty patients died, giving an overall hospital mortality of 29.7%. Hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with candidal infection (55.6% compared to 24.1%, P=0.02). Candida colonisation was associated with subsequent candidal infection on multivariate analysis. The Candida Colonisation Index Score was the most accurate test, with specificity of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68 to 0.88), sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.87), negative predictive value of 0.91 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.97) and a positive likelihood ratio of 3.2 (95% CI 1.9 to 5.5). The Candida Colonisation Index Score showed the best discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.87).
In this study the Candida Colonisation Index Score was the most accurate and discriminative test at identifying which patients with severe acute pancreatitis are at risk of developing candidal infection. However its low sensitivity may limit its clinical usefulness.
重症急性胰腺炎患者有发生念珠菌感染的风险,这可能会增加死亡风险。由于早期诊断存在问题,已开发出多种临床风险评分来识别有风险的患者。这类患者可能从预防性抗真菌治疗中获益,而感染风险低的患者可能无获益且可能受到伤害。本研究的目的是评估重症急性胰腺炎患者侵袭性念珠菌感染现有风险评分的有效性和区分能力。
对入住重症监护病房的重症急性胰腺炎患者进行分析。比较有念珠菌感染和无念珠菌感染患者的入院结局及风险因素。评估了三种侵袭性念珠菌感染现有风险评分(念珠菌评分、念珠菌定植指数评分和侵袭性念珠菌病评分)的准确性和区分能力。
2003年至2011年共确定了101例患者,其中18例(17.8%)发生了念珠菌感染。30例患者死亡,总体医院死亡率为29.7%。念珠菌感染患者的医院死亡率显著更高(55.6% 对比24.1%,P = 0.02)。多因素分析显示念珠菌定植与随后的念珠菌感染相关。念珠菌定植指数评分是最准确的检测方法,特异性为0.79(95%置信区间[CI] 0.68至0.88),敏感性为0.67(95% CI 0.41至0.87),阴性预测值为0.91(95% CI 0.82至0.97),阳性似然比为3.2(95% CI 1.9至5.5)。念珠菌定植指数评分在识别重症急性胰腺炎患者发生念珠菌感染风险方面显示出最佳区分能力,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.79(95% CI 0.69至0.87)。
在本研究中,念珠菌定植指数评分在识别哪些重症急性胰腺炎患者有发生念珠菌感染风险方面是最准确且区分能力最强的检测方法。然而,其低敏感性可能会限制其临床实用性。