Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Jun;126(6):1457-72. doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2064-2. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
Although the effects of linkage disequilibrium (LD) on partition of genetic variance have received attention in quantitative genetics, there has been little discussion on how this phenomenon affects attribution of variance to a given locus. This paper reinforces the point that standard metrics used for assessing the contribution of a locus to variance can be misleading when there is linkage LD and that factors such as distribution of effects and of allelic frequencies over loci, or existence of frequency-dependent effects, play a role as well. An apparently new metric is proposed for measuring how much of the variability is contributed by a locus when LD exists. Effects of intervening factors, such as type and extent of LD, number of loci, distribution of effects, and of allelic frequencies over loci, as well as a model for generating frequency-dependent effects, are illustrated via hypothetical simulation scenarios. Implications on the interpretation of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), as typically carried out in human genetics, where single marker regression and the assumption of a sole quantitative trait locus (QTL) are common, are discussed. It is concluded that the standard attributions to variance contributed by a single QTL from a GWAS analysis may be misleading, conceptually and statistically, when a trait is complex and affected by sets of many genes in linkage disequilibrium. Yet another factor to consider in the "missing heritability" saga?.
尽管连锁不平衡 (LD) 对遗传方差的分配的影响在数量遗传学中受到关注,但对于这种现象如何影响将方差归因于特定基因座的问题,讨论甚少。本文再次强调,当存在连锁 LD 时,用于评估基因座对方差贡献的标准度量可能会产生误导,并且诸如效应和等位基因频率在基因座上的分布、频率依赖性效应的存在等因素也会产生影响。当存在 LD 时,提出了一种新的度量标准,用于衡量基因座贡献的变异量。通过假设模拟场景,说明了中间因素(如 LD 的类型和程度、基因座的数量、效应和等位基因频率在基因座上的分布,以及产生频率依赖性效应的模型)的影响。讨论了其对全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的解释的影响,GWAS 通常在人类遗传学中进行,其中单标记回归和单一数量性状基因座(QTL)的假设是常见的。结论是,当性状复杂且受到多组连锁 LD 基因的影响时,从 GWAS 分析中对单个 QTL 贡献的方差的标准归因可能在概念上和统计学上具有误导性。这是“缺失遗传力”传奇中的另一个因素吗?