• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受过语言训练的黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)会说出他们所看到的东西,但首先会看他们没有看到的东西。

Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) name what they have seen but look first at what they have not seen.

机构信息

Language Research Center, Georgia State University. Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):660-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797612458936. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1177/0956797612458936
PMID:23508741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3902479/
Abstract

Metacognition can be defined as knowing what one knows, and the question of whether nonhuman animals are metacognitive has driven an intense debate. We tested 3 language-trained chimpanzees in an information-seeking task in which the identity of a food item was the critical piece of information needed to obtain the food. The chimpanzees could either report the identity of the food immediately or first check a container in which the food had been hidden. In two experiments, the chimpanzees were significantly more likely to visit the container first on trials in which they could not know its contents but were more likely to just name the food item without looking into the container on trials in which they had seen its contents. Thus, chimpanzees showed efficient information-seeking behavior that suggested they knew what they had or had not already seen when it was time to name a hidden item.

摘要

元认知可以被定义为知道自己知道什么,而关于非人类动物是否具有元认知的问题引发了激烈的争论。我们在一个信息寻求任务中测试了 3 只受过语言训练的黑猩猩,在这个任务中,食物的身份是获得食物所需的关键信息。黑猩猩可以立即报告食物的身份,或者先检查一个藏有食物的容器。在两项实验中,当黑猩猩无法知道容器内的内容时,它们更有可能先去查看容器;而当它们已经看到过容器内的内容时,它们更有可能只是直接说出食物的名称,而不去查看容器。因此,黑猩猩表现出了有效的信息寻求行为,这表明它们在需要说出隐藏物品的名称时,知道自己已经看到或没有看到过什么。

相似文献

1
Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) name what they have seen but look first at what they have not seen.受过语言训练的黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)会说出他们所看到的东西,但首先会看他们没有看到的东西。
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):660-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797612458936. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
2
Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes.黑猩猩通过使用工具、进行推理和评估可能的结果,表现出一些有选择地获取信息的迹象。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0193229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193229. eCollection 2018.
3
Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the role of magnitude, contiguity, and wholeness.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)对食物量的感知:数量、连续性和整体性的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Oct;35(4):516-24. doi: 10.1037/a0015488.
4
Flexible information-seeking in chimpanzees.黑猩猩灵活的信息获取方式。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105898. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
The effect of response contingencies on scale model task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).反应偶然性对黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)比例模型任务表现的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2001 Sep;115(3):300-6. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.3.300.
6
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens) know when they are ignorant about the location of food.黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)和人类儿童(智人)知道自己何时不知道食物的位置。
Anim Cogn. 2015 May;18(3):683-99. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0836-6. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
Chimpanzees () recognize that their guesses could be wrong and can pass a two-cup disjunctive syllogism task.黑猩猩能够认识到自己的猜测可能是错误的,并能够通过双杯分离 syllogism 任务。
Biol Lett. 2024 Jun;20(6):20240051. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0051. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
8
Prospective memory in children and chimpanzees.儿童和黑猩猩的前瞻性记忆。
Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0661-8. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) use markers to monitor the movement of a hidden item.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)使用标记物来监测隐藏物品的移动。
Primates. 2005 Oct;46(4):255-9. doi: 10.1007/s10329-005-0150-z. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
10
Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) delay gratification by choosing token exchange over immediate reward consumption.经过语言训练的黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)会选择代币兑换而不是立即奖励消费,从而延迟满足。
Am J Primatol. 2012 Sep;74(9):864-70. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22042. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Emergence of Metacognition in Rhesus Monkeys.恒河猴元认知的早期出现
Dev Sci. 2025 May;28(3):e70012. doi: 10.1111/desc.70012.
2
Metacognition in nonhuman primates: a review of current knowledge.非人类灵长类动物的元认知:当前知识综述
Primates. 2025 Jan;66(1):9-25. doi: 10.1007/s10329-024-01169-x. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
3
Flexible information-seeking in chimpanzees.黑猩猩灵活的信息获取方式。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105898. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Metacognition in wild Japanese macaques: cost and stakes influencing information-seeking behavior.野生日本猕猴的元认知:成本和利害关系影响信息寻求行为。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 5;27(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01851-z.
5
A Dissociative Framework for Understanding Same-Different Conceptualization.一个用于理解异同概念化的解离框架。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Feb;37:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Slow Progress with the Most Widely Used Animal Model: Ten Years of Metacognition Research in Rats, 2009-2019.最广泛使用的动物模型进展缓慢:2009 - 2019年大鼠元认知研究的十年
Anim Behav Cogn. 2019 Nov;6(4):273-277. doi: 10.26451/abc.06.04.07.2019.
7
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show subtle signs of uncertainty when choices are more difficult.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在选择更加困难时会表现出细微的不确定迹象。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104766. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104766. Epub 2021 May 26.
8
Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates.非人类灵长类动物的结果预期与次优风险选择。
Learn Behav. 2020 Sep;48(3):301-321. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00406-4.
9
Simultaneous versus prospective/retrospective uncertainty monitoring: The effect of response competition across cognitive levels.同步与前瞻性/回顾性不确定性监测:跨认知水平的反应竞争效应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(3):311-321. doi: 10.1037/xan0000207. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes.黑猩猩通过使用工具、进行推理和评估可能的结果,表现出一些有选择地获取信息的迹象。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0193229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193229. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating information-seeking approaches to metacognition.评估元认知的信息寻求方法。
Curr Zool. 2011;57(4):531-542. doi: 10.1093/czoolo/57.4.531.
2
Metacognition in animals.动物的元认知
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2009;4:1-16. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2009.40001.
3
Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing.元记忆信息源:学习判断和熟悉感。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Sep;1(3):357-75. doi: 10.3758/BF03213977.
4
The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research.动物元认知研究中理论解释的高低起伏。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1297-309. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0366.
5
"Play it Again": a new method for testing metacognition in animals.“再来一次”:一种测试动物元认知的新方法。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Mar;15(2):187-99. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0445-y. Epub 2011 Sep 11.
6
A chimpanzee recognizes synthetic speech with significantly reduced acoustic cues to phonetic content.黑猩猩能够识别语音内容的声学线索明显减少的合成语音。
Curr Biol. 2011 Jul 26;21(14):1210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
7
Do apes know that they could be wrong?猩猩知道它们可能会犯错吗?
Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):689-700. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0317-x. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
8
The study of animal metacognition.动物元认知的研究。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;13(9):389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
9
How we know our own minds: the relationship between mindreading and metacognition.我们如何认识自己的心智:读心术与元认知之间的关系。
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Apr;32(2):121-38; discussion 138-82. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000545.
10
Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?鸽子(家鸽)会为考试而学习吗?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Apr;35(2):129-42. doi: 10.1037/a0013722.