• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Wait, are you sad or angry? Large exposure time differences required for the categorization of facial expressions of emotion.等等,你是悲伤还是生气?对情绪面部表情进行分类需要较大的曝光时间差异。
J Vis. 2013 Mar 18;13(4):13. doi: 10.1167/13.4.13.
2
Recognition thresholds for static and dynamic emotional faces.静态和动态情绪面孔的识别阈值。
Emotion. 2016 Dec;16(8):1186-1200. doi: 10.1037/emo0000192. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
3
Perceptual learning and recognition confusion reveal the underlying relationships among the six basic emotions.知觉学习与识别混淆揭示了六种基本情绪之间的潜在关系。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Jun;33(4):754-767. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1491831. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
4
Classification of dynamic facial expressions of emotion presented briefly.简要呈现动态面部表情的情感分类。
Cogn Emot. 2013;27(8):1486-94. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.794128. Epub 2013 May 9.
5
Selective Impairment of Basic Emotion Recognition in People with Autism: Discrimination Thresholds for Recognition of Facial Expressions of Varying Intensities.自闭症患者基本情绪识别的选择性损伤:识别不同强度面部表情的辨别阈值。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Jun;48(6):1886-1894. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3428-2.
6
Not on the face alone: perception of contextualized face expressions in Huntington's disease.不仅仅局限于面部:亨廷顿舞蹈症中情境化面部表情的感知
Brain. 2009 Jun;132(Pt 6):1633-44. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp067. Epub 2009 May 18.
7
Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set--Bath Intensity Variations (ADFES-BIV): A Set of Videos Expressing Low, Intermediate, and High Intensity Emotions.阿姆斯特丹动态面部表情集 - 巴斯强度变化版(ADFES - BIV)的验证:一组表达低、中、高强度情绪的视频
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0147112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147112. eCollection 2016.
8
Cultural facial expressions dynamically convey emotion category and intensity information.文化性面部表情动态地传达情感类别和强度信息。
Curr Biol. 2024 Jan 8;34(1):213-223.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
9
A computational shape-based model of anger and sadness justifies a configural representation of faces.一个基于计算形状的愤怒与悲伤模型证明了面部的构型表征。
Vision Res. 2010 Aug 6;50(17):1693-711. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.024. Epub 2010 May 25.
10
Children's recognition of happy, sad, and angry facial expressions across emotive intensities.儿童对不同情绪强度下的快乐、悲伤和愤怒面部表情的识别。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Sep;197:104881. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104881. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Drift-diffusion modeling reveals that masked faces are preconceived as unfriendly.漂移扩散模型揭示,被掩蔽的面孔被预先认为是不友好的。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 9;13(1):16982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44162-y.
2
Nonlocal contrast calculated by the second order visual mechanisms and its significance in identifying facial emotions.由二阶视觉机制计算的非局部对比度及其对面部表情识别的意义。
F1000Res. 2023 Aug 29;10:274. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.28396.2. eCollection 2021.
3
Gauging response time distributions to examine the effect of facial expression inversion.测量反应时间分布以检验面部表情倒置的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 24;14:957160. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.957160. eCollection 2023.
4
Intracerebral Electrophysiological Recordings to Understand the Neural Basis of Human Face Recognition.颅内电生理记录以了解人脸识别的神经基础。
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 18;13(2):354. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020354.
5
The Influence of Key Facial Features on Recognition of Emotion in Cartoon Faces.关键面部特征对卡通面孔中情绪识别的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 10;12:687974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687974. eCollection 2021.
6
The influence of spatial location on same-different judgments of facial identity and expression.空间位置对面部身份和表情异同判断的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Oct 22. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000872.
7
Compositionality in the language of emotion.情感语言的组合性。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 15;13(8):e0201970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201970. eCollection 2018.
8
How socioemotional setting modulates late-stage conflict resolution processes in the lateral prefrontal cortex.社会情感环境如何调节外侧前额叶皮层的晚期冲突解决过程。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jun;18(3):521-535. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0585-5.
9
Hemiface Differences in Visual Exploration Patterns When Judging the Authenticity of Facial Expressions.判断面部表情真实性时视觉探索模式的半脸差异
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 10;8:2332. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02332. eCollection 2017.
10
Visual perception of facial expressions of emotion.面部表情情绪的视觉感知。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Oct;17:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Deciphering the Face.解读面部。
Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2011;2011:7-12. doi: 10.1109/CVPRW.2011.5981690.
2
A Model of the Perception of Facial Expressions of Emotion by Humans: Research Overview and Perspectives.人类对情绪面部表情的感知模型:研究综述与展望
J Mach Learn Res. 2012 May 1;13:1589-1608.
3
Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal.情绪的面部表情不是文化上普遍存在的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7241-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200155109. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
4
The resolution of facial expressions of emotion.面部表情情感的分辨
J Vis. 2011 Nov 30;11(13):24. doi: 10.1167/11.13.24.
5
Dopamine transmission in the amygdala modulates surprise in an aversive blocking paradigm.杏仁核中的多巴胺传递在厌恶性阻断范式中调节意外感。
Behav Neurosci. 2010 Dec;124(6):780-8. doi: 10.1037/a0021111.
6
Psychophysics of emotion: the QUEST for emotional attention.情绪的心理物理学:对情绪注意力的探索。
J Vis. 2010 Mar 24;10(3):4.1-9. doi: 10.1167/10.3.4.
7
Amygdala damage affects event-related potentials for fearful faces at specific time windows.杏仁核损伤会影响特定时间窗口内对恐惧面孔的事件相关电位。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Jul;31(7):1089-105. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20921.
8
Dynamics of trimming the content of face representations for categorization in the brain.大脑中用于分类的面部表示内容修剪的动力学。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Nov;5(11):e1000561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000561. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
9
Intact rapid detection of fearful faces in the absence of the amygdala.在杏仁核缺失的情况下完整快速地检测恐惧面孔。
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Oct;12(10):1224-5. doi: 10.1038/nn.2380. Epub 2009 Aug 30.
10
Smile through your fear and sadness: transmitting and identifying facial expression signals over a range of viewing distances.微笑面对恐惧和悲伤:在各种观看距离下传递和识别面部表情信号。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct;20(10):1202-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02427.x. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

等等,你是悲伤还是生气?对情绪面部表情进行分类需要较大的曝光时间差异。

Wait, are you sad or angry? Large exposure time differences required for the categorization of facial expressions of emotion.

作者信息

Du Shichuan, Martinez Aleix M

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2013 Mar 18;13(4):13. doi: 10.1167/13.4.13.

DOI:10.1167/13.4.13
PMID:23509409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3604912/
Abstract

Facial expressions of emotion are essential components of human behavior, yet little is known about the hierarchical organization of their cognitive analysis. We study the minimum exposure time needed to successfully classify the six classical facial expressions of emotion (joy, surprise, sadness, anger, disgust, fear) plus neutral as seen at different image resolutions (240 × 160 to 15 × 10 pixels). Our results suggest a consistent hierarchical analysis of these facial expressions regardless of the resolution of the stimuli. Happiness and surprise can be recognized after very short exposure times (10-20 ms), even at low resolutions. Fear and anger are recognized the slowest (100-250 ms), even in high-resolution images, suggesting a later computation. Sadness and disgust are recognized in between (70-200 ms). The minimum exposure time required for successful classification of each facial expression correlates with the ability of a human subject to identify it correctly at low resolutions. These results suggest a fast, early computation of expressions represented mostly by low spatial frequencies or global configural cues and a later, slower process for those categories requiring a more fine-grained analysis of the image. We also demonstrate that those expressions that are mostly visible in higher-resolution images are not recognized as accurately. We summarize implications for current computational models.

摘要

情绪的面部表情是人类行为的重要组成部分,但对于其认知分析的层次组织却知之甚少。我们研究了在不同图像分辨率(240×160至15×10像素)下成功分类六种经典情绪面部表情(喜悦、惊讶、悲伤、愤怒、厌恶、恐惧)以及中性表情所需的最短曝光时间。我们的结果表明,无论刺激的分辨率如何,对这些面部表情都存在一致的层次分析。即使在低分辨率下,幸福和惊讶在非常短的曝光时间(10 - 20毫秒)后也能被识别。恐惧和愤怒的识别速度最慢(100 - 250毫秒),即使在高分辨率图像中也是如此,这表明其计算过程较晚。悲伤和厌恶的识别时间介于两者之间(70 - 200毫秒)。成功分类每个面部表情所需的最短曝光时间与人类受试者在低分辨率下正确识别它的能力相关。这些结果表明,对于主要由低空间频率或全局配置线索表示的表情,存在快速、早期的计算过程,而对于那些需要对图像进行更精细分析的类别,则存在较晚、较慢的过程。我们还证明,那些在高分辨率图像中最明显的表情并不能被准确识别。我们总结了对当前计算模型的启示。