• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挑战 2 分钟潮气呼吸挑战试验。

Challenging the two-minute tidal breathing challenge test.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen , 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands .

出版信息

J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2013 Dec;26(6):380-6. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2012.1021. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1089/jamp.2012.1021
PMID:23509936
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge test, AMP is usually administered according to dosing protocols for methacholine. We investigated whether the 2-min tidal breathing challenge test for methacholine is applicable to AMP. Parameters known to affect nebulizer output were studied. Our aim was to determine whether control of additional parameters is needed for currently standardized protocols.

METHODS

The study was performed with the Sidestream nebulizer from the APS Pro Aerosol Provocation System (CareFusion Respiratory). The effects of AMP concentration, jet pressure, and suction flow rate on nebulizer output rate and aerosol droplet size distribution were determined.

RESULTS

The volume median diameter for water increased from 5.10 μm to 8.49 μm when the jet pressure was reduced to obtain the prescribed output rate of 0.13 mL/min. The output rate was increased when a suction flow rate was used to remove the aerosol. Increasing the AMP concentration resulted in smaller droplets and a lower output rate when a suction flow was applied.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of AMP concentration on nebulizer performance may result in changes in the administered dose and site of deposition of AMP at dose escalation. All of the investigated parameters influence nebulizer performance, hence the outcome of a bronchial challenge test. Therefore, these parameters should not only be specified in challenge testing, but be actively controlled as well.

摘要

背景

在腺苷 5'-单磷酸(AMP)支气管激发试验中,AMP 通常按照乙酰甲胆碱的给药方案进行给药。我们研究了乙酰甲胆碱的 2 分钟潮气呼吸激发试验是否适用于 AMP。研究了已知会影响雾化器输出的参数。我们的目的是确定目前标准化方案是否需要控制其他参数。

方法

本研究使用来自 APS Pro 雾化激发系统(CareFusion Respiratory)的 Sidestream 雾化器进行。确定了 AMP 浓度、射流压力和抽吸流速对雾化器输出速率和气溶胶液滴尺寸分布的影响。

结果

当降低射流压力以获得规定的 0.13 毫升/分钟输出速率时,水的体积中位直径从 5.10μm 增加到 8.49μm。当使用抽吸流量去除气溶胶时,输出速率增加。当应用抽吸流量时,增加 AMP 浓度会导致更小的液滴和更低的输出速率。

结论

AMP 浓度对雾化器性能的影响可能导致在剂量递增时 AMP 的给药剂量和沉积部位发生变化。所有研究的参数都会影响雾化器的性能,因此也会影响支气管激发试验的结果。因此,这些参数不仅应在激发试验中规定,而且应积极控制。

相似文献

1
Challenging the two-minute tidal breathing challenge test.挑战 2 分钟潮气呼吸挑战试验。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2013 Dec;26(6):380-6. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2012.1021. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
2
Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers.使用能使第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)下降20%的激发剂量的乙酰甲胆碱,来解读使用现代雾化器进行的乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Mar;12(3):357-63. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-433OC.
3
Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests.开发替代的乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的传递系统。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2014 Feb;27(1):66-70. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2013.1036. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
4
An in vitro study to investigate the use of a breath-actuated, small-volume, pneumatic nebulizer for the delivery of methacholine chloride bronchoprovocation agent.一项体外研究,旨在探究使用一种呼吸驱动的小容量气动雾化器来递送氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发剂。
Respir Care. 2003 Jan;48(1):46-51.
5
Methacholine dry powder inhaler as a new tool for bronchial challenge test.乙酰甲胆碱干粉吸入器作为支气管激发试验的新工具。
Int J Pharm. 2008 Mar 20;352(1-2):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.10.025. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
6
Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD.乙酰甲胆碱激发试验:一种测量帕金森病的新方法。
Chest. 2017 Dec;152(6):1251-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
7
Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.乙酰甲胆碱激发试验:振动网式雾化器与射流雾化器产生的气道反应性比较。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2018 Apr;31(2):88-93. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2017.1392. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
Adenosine dry powder inhalation for bronchial challenge testing, part 2: proof of concept in asthmatic subjects.用于支气管激发试验的腺苷干粉吸入剂,第2部分:哮喘患者的概念验证
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014 Sep;88(1):148-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
9
Standardizing dose in dosimetric bronchial challenge tests.剂量测定支气管激发试验中的剂量标准化
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Sep;38(5):903-906. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12498. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
10
Dose vs concentration in methacholine challenge.乙酰甲胆碱激发试验中的剂量与浓度
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Jun;98(6):598. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60744-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of AMP and adenosine induced dyspnea sensation to large and small airways dysfunction in asthma.AMP 和腺苷引起的哮喘大、小气道功能障碍呼吸困难的相关性。
BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0783-0.
2
A novel method for studying airway hyperresponsiveness in allergic guinea pigs in vivo using the PreciseInhale system for delivery of dry powder aerosols.一种使用 PreciseInhale 干粉气溶胶输送系统在体内研究变应性豚鼠气道高反应性的新方法。
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018 Jun;8(3):760-769. doi: 10.1007/s13346-018-0490-z.
3
Targeting the small airways with dry powder adenosine: a challenging concept.
用干粉腺苷靶向小气道:一个具有挑战性的概念。
Eur Clin Respir J. 2017 Sep 6;4(1):1369328. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2017.1369328. eCollection 2017.