Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 10340 Democracy Lane, Suite 202, Fairfax, VA 22033, USA.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 May;34(5):1804-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
Reliable and valid assessment of aberrant behaviors is essential in empirically verifying prevention and intervention for individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). Few instruments exist which assess behavior problems in infants. The current longitudinal study examined the performance of three behavior-rating scales for individuals with IDD that have been proven psychometrically sound in older populations: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), the Behavior Problems Inventory (BPI-01), and the Repetitive Behavior Scale - Revised (RBS-R). Data were analyzed for 180 between six and 36 months old children at risk for IDD. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) across the subscales of the three instruments was variable. Test-retest reliability of the three BPI-01 subscales ranged from .68 to .77 for frequency ratings and from .65 to .80 for severity ratings (intraclass correlation coefficients). Using a multitrait-multimethod matrix approach high levels of convergent and discriminant validity across the three instruments was found. As anticipated, there was considerable overlap in the information produced by the three instruments; however, each behavior-rating instrument also contributed unique information. Our findings support using all three scales in conjunction if possible.
可靠和有效的异常行为评估对于经验证预防和干预智力或发育障碍(IDD)个体至关重要。目前几乎没有专门评估婴儿行为问题的工具。本纵向研究检验了三种在年龄较大人群中已被证明具有良好心理测量学特性的行为评定量表在 IDD 个体中的表现:异常行为检查表(ABC)、行为问题清单(BPI-01)和重复行为量表修订版(RBS-R)。对 180 名年龄在 6 至 36 个月、有 IDD 风险的儿童进行了数据分析。三个工具的子量表的内部一致性(克朗巴赫 α)是可变的。三个 BPI-01 子量表的重测信度在频率评定中为.68 至.77,在严重程度评定中为.65 至.80(组内相关系数)。使用多特质-多方法矩阵方法,发现三个工具之间具有较高的会聚和区分效度。正如预期的那样,三个工具产生的信息有很大的重叠;然而,每个行为评定工具也提供了独特的信息。我们的研究结果支持如果可能的话同时使用这三个量表。