• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素受体阻断剂阿齐沙坦酯与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利的降压疗效比较。

Antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil compared with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril.

机构信息

Park-Klinikum Bad Krozingen, Herbert-Hellmann-Allee 44, Bad Krozingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2013 Aug;27(8):479-86. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2013.6. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1038/jhh.2013.6
PMID:23514842
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3715765/
Abstract

Drug therapy often fails to control hypertension. Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is a newly developed angiotensin II receptor blocker with high efficacy and good tolerability. This double-blind, controlled, randomised trial compared its antihypertensive efficacy and safety vs the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril (RAM) in patients with clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) 150-180 mm Hg. Patients were randomised (n=884) to 20 mg AZL-M or 2.5 mg RAM once daily for 2 weeks, then force-titrated to 40 or 80 mg AZL-M or 10 mg RAM for 22 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in trough, seated, clinic SBP. Mean patient age was 57±11 years, 52.4% were male, 99.5% were Caucasian. Mean baseline BP was 161.1±7.9/94.9±9.0 mm Hg. Clinic SBP decreased by 20.6±0.95 and 21.2±0.95 mm Hg with AZL-M 40 and 80 mg vs12.2±0.95 mm Hg with RAM (P<0.001 for both AZL-M doses). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were less frequent with AZL-M 40 and 80 mg (2.4% and 3.1%, respectively) than with RAM (4.8%). These data demonstrated that treatment of stage 1-2 hypertension with AZL-M was more effective than RAM and better tolerated.

摘要

药物治疗常常无法控制高血压。阿齐沙坦酯(AZL-M)是一种新开发的血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂,具有高效和良好的耐受性。这项双盲、对照、随机试验比较了其与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利(RAM)在诊室收缩压(SBP)为 150-180mmHg 的患者中的降压疗效和安全性。患者随机(n=884)分为 20mg AZL-M 或 2.5mg RAM 组,每日一次,治疗 2 周,然后强制滴定至 40 或 80mg AZL-M 或 10mg RAM,治疗 22 周。主要终点是谷值、坐姿、诊室 SBP 的变化。患者平均年龄为 57±11 岁,52.4%为男性,99.5%为白种人。平均基线血压为 161.1±7.9/94.9±9.0mmHg。AZL-M 40 和 80mg 组诊室 SBP 分别下降 20.6±0.95 和 21.2±0.95mmHg,而 RAM 组下降 12.2±0.95mmHg(AZL-M 两组均 P<0.001)。AZL-M 40 和 80mg 组因不良反应导致停药的发生率分别为 2.4%和 3.1%,低于 RAM 组(4.8%)。这些数据表明,AZL-M 治疗 1-2 期高血压的疗效优于 RAM,且耐受性更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c48/3715765/b7ae42c8edf9/jhh20136f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c48/3715765/016cd34fd4fd/jhh20136f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c48/3715765/6d194bd244ea/jhh20136f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c48/3715765/b7ae42c8edf9/jhh20136f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c48/3715765/016cd34fd4fd/jhh20136f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c48/3715765/6d194bd244ea/jhh20136f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c48/3715765/b7ae42c8edf9/jhh20136f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil compared with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril.血管紧张素受体阻断剂阿齐沙坦酯与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利的降压疗效比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 2013 Aug;27(8):479-86. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2013.6. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
2
The renin-angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil compared with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in clinical trials versus routine practice: insights from the prospective EARLY registry.在临床试验与常规实践中比较肾素-血管紧张素受体阻滞剂阿齐沙坦美洛昔酯与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利:来自前瞻性EARLY注册研究的见解
Trials. 2015 Dec 19;16:581. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1100-8.
3
A phase 3 double-blind randomized (CONSORT-compliant) study of azilsartan medoxomil compared to valsartan in Chinese patients with essential hypertension.在中国原发性高血压患者中进行的阿齐沙坦美索酯与缬沙坦对比的3期双盲随机(符合CONSORT标准)研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21465. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021465.
4
Efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil/chlortalidone fixed-dose combination in hypertensive patients uncontrolled on azilsartan medoxomil alone: A randomized trial.在单独使用阿齐沙坦酯/氯沙坦固定剂量组合控制不佳的高血压患者中,阿齐沙坦酯/氯沙坦固定剂量组合的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Oct;20(10):1473-1484. doi: 10.1111/jch.13376. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the fixed-dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone: a factorial study.阿齐沙坦酯-氨氯地平固定剂量复方制剂的降压疗效:一项析因研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 May;14(5):284-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00616.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
6
Patients With Newly Diagnosed Hypertension Treated With the Renin Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: The Prospective EARLY Registry.肾素血管紧张素受体阻滞剂阿齐沙坦美多昔酯与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗新诊断高血压患者:前瞻性EARLY注册研究
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Dec;17(12):947-53. doi: 10.1111/jch.12603. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
7
Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.在 1 期和 2 期高血压患者中,血管紧张素受体阻断剂阿齐沙坦酯与奥美沙坦和缬沙坦对动态血压和诊室血压的影响。
Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
8
Azilsartan compared to ACE inhibitors in anti-hypertensive therapy: one-year outcomes of the observational EARLY registry.阿齐沙坦与ACE抑制剂在抗高血压治疗中的比较:观察性EARLY注册研究的一年结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Mar 8;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0222-6.
9
Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil with or without chlorthalidone during and after 8 months of treatment for hypertension.阿齐沙坦美洛昔酯联合或不联合氯噻酮治疗高血压8个月期间及之后的安全性、耐受性和疗效。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Mar;17(3):183-92. doi: 10.1111/jch.12474. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
10
Azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone reduces blood pressure more effectively than olmesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 systolic hypertension.奥美沙坦酯氨氯地平复方制剂降压疗效优于奥美沙坦酯氢氯噻嗪复方制剂治疗 2 级收缩期高血压。
Hypertension. 2012 Aug;60(2):310-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.188284. Epub 2012 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil in the treatment of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阿齐沙坦酯治疗高血压的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 4;11:1383217. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1383217. eCollection 2024.
2
The Number of Pills, Rather Than the Type of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitor, Predicts Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control in Essential Hypertensives on Triple Therapy: A Real-Life Cross-Sectional Study.在三联治疗的原发性高血压患者中,控制血压的是药丸数量,而不是肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂的类型:一项真实世界的横断面研究。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jul;38(7):4013-4025. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01799-3. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.采用动态血压监测比较新型血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂阿齐沙坦酯与缬沙坦。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Jul;13(7):467-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00482.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
2
Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.在 1 期和 2 期高血压患者中,血管紧张素受体阻断剂阿齐沙坦酯与奥美沙坦和缬沙坦对动态血压和诊室血压的影响。
Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
3
A phase 3 double-blind randomized (CONSORT-compliant) study of azilsartan medoxomil compared to valsartan in Chinese patients with essential hypertension.
在中国原发性高血压患者中进行的阿齐沙坦美索酯与缬沙坦对比的3期双盲随机(符合CONSORT标准)研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21465. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021465.
4
Should Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ever Be Used for the Management of Hypertension?血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂是否应该用于高血压的治疗?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jul 9;22(9):95. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01352-8.
5
Solubility of Azilsartan in Methanol, Ethanol, Acetonitrile, -Propanol, Isopropanol, Tetrahydrofuran, and Binary Solvent Mixtures between 293.15 and 333.15 K.阿齐沙坦在甲醇、乙醇、乙腈、正丙醇、异丙醇、四氢呋喃以及293.15至333.15 K之间的二元溶剂混合物中的溶解度。
ACS Omega. 2020 Mar 13;5(11):6141-6145. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00156. eCollection 2020 Mar 24.
6
Resistant Hypertension Updated Guidelines.难治性高血压更新指南。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Aug 30;21(10):117. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1209-6.
7
Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.耐药性高血压:检测、评估与管理:美国心脏协会科学声明。
Hypertension. 2018 Nov;72(5):e53-e90. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084.
8
Azilsartan as a Potent Antihypertensive Drug with Possible Pleiotropic Cardiometabolic Effects: A Review Study.阿齐沙坦作为一种具有潜在多效性心脏代谢效应的强效抗高血压药物:一项综述研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2016 Aug 3;7:235. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00235. eCollection 2016.
9
Azilsartan medoxomil in the management of hypertension: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.阿齐沙坦美洛昔酯在高血压治疗中的应用:基于证据对其治疗地位的综述
Core Evid. 2016 Apr 5;11:1-10. doi: 10.2147/CE.S81776. eCollection 2016.
10
Azilsartan compared to ACE inhibitors in anti-hypertensive therapy: one-year outcomes of the observational EARLY registry.阿齐沙坦与ACE抑制剂在抗高血压治疗中的比较:观察性EARLY注册研究的一年结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Mar 8;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0222-6.
The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure.
阿齐沙坦酯和美托洛尔对动态和诊室血压的比较影响。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Feb;13(2):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00425.x.
4
In vitro antagonistic properties of a new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan, in receptor binding and function studies.在受体结合和功能研究中,一种新型血管紧张素 1 型受体阻滞剂——阿齐沙坦的体外拮抗特性。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011 Mar;336(3):801-8. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.176636. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
5
Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events.缬沙坦对糖尿病和心血管事件发生的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1477-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001121. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
6
Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document.欧洲高血压管理指南重新评估:欧洲高血压学会特别工作组文件
Blood Press. 2009;18(6):308-47. doi: 10.3109/08037050903450468.
7
Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies.降压药物在心血管疾病预防中的应用:基于前瞻性流行病学研究预期的147项随机试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 2009 May 19;338:b1665. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1665.
8
EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries.欧洲动脉粥样硬化调查III:对来自22个欧洲国家的冠心病患者的生活方式、风险因素及心脏保护药物治疗使用情况的调查。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Apr;16(2):121-37. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283294b1d.
9
Renal outcomes with telmisartan, ramipril, or both, in people at high vascular risk (the ONTARGET study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.替米沙坦、雷米普利或二者联用对高血管风险人群的肾脏结局影响(ONTARGET研究):一项多中心、随机、双盲、对照试验
Lancet. 2008 Aug 16;372(9638):547-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61236-2.
10
Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials.不同降压方案对老年人和年轻人主要心血管事件的影响:随机试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1121-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39548.738368.BE. Epub 2008 May 14.